Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS
↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)
↳2 QDP
↳3 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
↳4 QDP
↳5 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
↳6 QDP
↳7 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
↳8 QDP
↳9 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
↳10 QDP
↳11 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
↳12 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__first(0, X) → nil
a__first(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) → cons(mark(Y), first(X, Z))
a__from(X) → cons(mark(X), from(s(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → a__first(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(from(X)) → a__from(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
mark(nil) → nil
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(mark(X1), X2)
a__first(X1, X2) → first(X1, X2)
a__from(X) → from(X)

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

A__FIRST(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) → MARK(Y)
A__FROM(X) → MARK(X)
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → A__FIRST(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(from(X)) → A__FROM(mark(X))
MARK(from(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__first(0, X) → nil
a__first(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) → cons(mark(Y), first(X, Z))
a__from(X) → cons(mark(X), from(s(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → a__first(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(from(X)) → a__from(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
mark(nil) → nil
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(mark(X1), X2)
a__first(X1, X2) → first(X1, X2)
a__from(X) → from(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MARK(first(X1, X2)) → A__FIRST(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(from(X)) → MARK(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
A__FIRST(x1, x2)  =  A__FIRST(x2)
MARK(x1)  =  MARK(x1)
A__FROM(x1)  =  A__FROM(x1)

Tags:
A__FIRST has tags [3,3]
MARK has tags [3]
A__FROM has tags [3]

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
s(x1)  =  x1
cons(x1, x2)  =  x1
first(x1, x2)  =  first(x1, x2)
mark(x1)  =  mark(x1)
from(x1)  =  from(x1)
a__first(x1, x2)  =  a__first(x1, x2)
a__from(x1)  =  a__from(x1)
0  =  0
nil  =  nil

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[first2, mark1, from1, afirst2, afrom1] > [0, nil]

Status:
first2: [2,1]
mark1: [1]
from1: [1]
afirst2: [2,1]
afrom1: [1]
0: []
nil: []


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

mark(first(X1, X2)) → a__first(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(from(X)) → a__from(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
mark(nil) → nil
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(mark(X1), X2)
a__from(X) → cons(mark(X), from(s(X)))
a__first(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) → cons(mark(Y), first(X, Z))
a__from(X) → from(X)
a__first(0, X) → nil
a__first(X1, X2) → first(X1, X2)

(4) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

A__FIRST(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) → MARK(Y)
A__FROM(X) → MARK(X)
MARK(from(X)) → A__FROM(mark(X))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__first(0, X) → nil
a__first(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) → cons(mark(Y), first(X, Z))
a__from(X) → cons(mark(X), from(s(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → a__first(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(from(X)) → a__from(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
mark(nil) → nil
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(mark(X1), X2)
a__first(X1, X2) → first(X1, X2)
a__from(X) → from(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(5) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.

(6) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(from(X)) → A__FROM(mark(X))
A__FROM(X) → MARK(X)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__first(0, X) → nil
a__first(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) → cons(mark(Y), first(X, Z))
a__from(X) → cons(mark(X), from(s(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → a__first(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(from(X)) → a__from(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
mark(nil) → nil
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(mark(X1), X2)
a__first(X1, X2) → first(X1, X2)
a__from(X) → from(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(7) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
MARK(x1)  =  MARK(x1)
A__FROM(x1)  =  A__FROM(x1)

Tags:
MARK has tags [1]
A__FROM has tags [1]

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
from(x1)  =  from(x1)
mark(x1)  =  mark(x1)
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
cons(x1, x2)  =  x1
first(x1, x2)  =  first(x2)
a__first(x1, x2)  =  a__first(x2)
a__from(x1)  =  a__from(x1)
0  =  0
nil  =  nil

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[from1, mark1, first1, afirst1, afrom1, nil] > s1
[from1, mark1, first1, afirst1, afrom1, nil] > 0

Status:
from1: [1]
mark1: [1]
s1: [1]
first1: [1]
afirst1: [1]
afrom1: [1]
0: []
nil: []


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

mark(first(X1, X2)) → a__first(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(from(X)) → a__from(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
mark(nil) → nil
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(mark(X1), X2)
a__from(X) → cons(mark(X), from(s(X)))
a__first(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) → cons(mark(Y), first(X, Z))
a__from(X) → from(X)
a__first(0, X) → nil
a__first(X1, X2) → first(X1, X2)

(8) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(from(X)) → A__FROM(mark(X))
A__FROM(X) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__first(0, X) → nil
a__first(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) → cons(mark(Y), first(X, Z))
a__from(X) → cons(mark(X), from(s(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → a__first(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(from(X)) → a__from(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
mark(nil) → nil
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(mark(X1), X2)
a__first(X1, X2) → first(X1, X2)
a__from(X) → from(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(9) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MARK(from(X)) → A__FROM(mark(X))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
MARK(x1)  =  MARK(x1)
A__FROM(x1)  =  A__FROM(x1)

Tags:
MARK has tags [0]
A__FROM has tags [0]

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
from(x1)  =  from(x1)
mark(x1)  =  x1
cons(x1, x2)  =  cons(x1)
first(x1, x2)  =  first(x1, x2)
a__first(x1, x2)  =  a__first(x1, x2)
a__from(x1)  =  a__from(x1)
0  =  0
nil  =  nil
s(x1)  =  s

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[from1, afrom1] > cons1
0 > nil
s > [first2, afirst2] > cons1
s > [first2, afirst2] > nil

Status:
from1: [1]
cons1: [1]
first2: [1,2]
afirst2: [1,2]
afrom1: [1]
0: []
nil: []
s: []


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

mark(first(X1, X2)) → a__first(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(from(X)) → a__from(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
mark(nil) → nil
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(mark(X1), X2)
a__from(X) → cons(mark(X), from(s(X)))
a__first(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) → cons(mark(Y), first(X, Z))
a__from(X) → from(X)
a__first(0, X) → nil
a__first(X1, X2) → first(X1, X2)

(10) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

A__FROM(X) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__first(0, X) → nil
a__first(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) → cons(mark(Y), first(X, Z))
a__from(X) → cons(mark(X), from(s(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → a__first(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(from(X)) → a__from(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
mark(nil) → nil
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(mark(X1), X2)
a__first(X1, X2) → first(X1, X2)
a__from(X) → from(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(11) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node.

(12) TRUE