Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS
↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)
↳2 QDP
↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
↳4 AND
    ↳5 QDP
        ↳6 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳7 QDP
        ↳8 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
        ↳9 TRUE
    ↳10 QDP
        ↳11 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳12 QDP
        ↳13 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳14 QDP
        ↳15 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
        ↳16 TRUE
    ↳17 QDP
        ↳18 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳19 QDP
        ↳20 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
        ↳21 TRUE
    ↳22 QDP
        ↳23 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳24 QDP
        ↳25 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳26 QDP
        ↳27 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
        ↳28 TRUE
    ↳29 QDP
        ↳30 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳31 QDP
        ↳32 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
        ↳33 TRUE
    ↳34 QDP
        ↳35 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳36 QDP
        ↳37 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳38 QDP
        ↳39 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
        ↳40 TRUE
    ↳41 QDP
        ↳42 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳43 QDP
        ↳44 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
        ↳45 QDP
        ↳46 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳47 QDP
        ↳48 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
        ↳49 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(fst(0, Z)) → MARK(nil)
ACTIVE(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → MARK(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
ACTIVE(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → CONS(Y, fst(X, Z))
ACTIVE(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → FST(X, Z)
ACTIVE(from(X)) → MARK(cons(X, from(s(X))))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → CONS(X, from(s(X)))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → FROM(s(X))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → S(X)
ACTIVE(add(0, X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → MARK(s(add(X, Y)))
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → S(add(X, Y))
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → ADD(X, Y)
ACTIVE(len(nil)) → MARK(0)
ACTIVE(len(cons(X, Z))) → MARK(s(len(Z)))
ACTIVE(len(cons(X, Z))) → S(len(Z))
ACTIVE(len(cons(X, Z))) → LEN(Z)
MARK(fst(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(fst(X1, X2)) → FST(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(fst(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(fst(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(0) → ACTIVE(0)
MARK(nil) → ACTIVE(nil)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(X))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → CONS(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(from(X)) → ACTIVE(from(mark(X)))
MARK(from(X)) → FROM(mark(X))
MARK(from(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ADD(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(len(X)) → ACTIVE(len(mark(X)))
MARK(len(X)) → LEN(mark(X))
MARK(len(X)) → MARK(X)
FST(mark(X1), X2) → FST(X1, X2)
FST(X1, mark(X2)) → FST(X1, X2)
FST(active(X1), X2) → FST(X1, X2)
FST(X1, active(X2)) → FST(X1, X2)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
S(active(X)) → S(X)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
FROM(mark(X)) → FROM(X)
FROM(active(X)) → FROM(X)
ADD(mark(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(X1, mark(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(active(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(X1, active(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
LEN(mark(X)) → LEN(X)
LEN(active(X)) → LEN(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 7 SCCs with 18 less nodes.

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LEN(active(X)) → LEN(X)
LEN(mark(X)) → LEN(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


LEN(active(X)) → LEN(X)
LEN(mark(X)) → LEN(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(LEN(x1)) = x1   
POL(active(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL(mark(x1)) = 1 + x1   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(9) TRUE

(10) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ADD(X1, mark(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(mark(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(active(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(X1, active(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(11) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


ADD(mark(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(active(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(ADD(x1, x2)) = x1   
POL(active(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL(mark(x1)) = 1 + x1   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(12) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ADD(X1, mark(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(X1, active(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(13) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


ADD(X1, mark(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(X1, active(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(ADD(x1, x2)) = x2   
POL(active(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL(mark(x1)) = 1 + x1   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(14) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(15) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(16) TRUE

(17) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FROM(active(X)) → FROM(X)
FROM(mark(X)) → FROM(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(18) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


FROM(active(X)) → FROM(X)
FROM(mark(X)) → FROM(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(FROM(x1)) = x1   
POL(active(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL(mark(x1)) = 1 + x1   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(19) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(20) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(21) TRUE

(22) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(23) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(CONS(x1, x2)) = x1   
POL(active(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL(mark(x1)) = 1 + x1   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(24) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(25) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(CONS(x1, x2)) = x2   
POL(active(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL(mark(x1)) = 1 + x1   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(26) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(27) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(28) TRUE

(29) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(active(X)) → S(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(30) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


S(active(X)) → S(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(S(x1)) = x1   
POL(active(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL(mark(x1)) = 1 + x1   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(31) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(32) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(33) TRUE

(34) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FST(X1, mark(X2)) → FST(X1, X2)
FST(mark(X1), X2) → FST(X1, X2)
FST(active(X1), X2) → FST(X1, X2)
FST(X1, active(X2)) → FST(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(35) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


FST(mark(X1), X2) → FST(X1, X2)
FST(active(X1), X2) → FST(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(FST(x1, x2)) = x1   
POL(active(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL(mark(x1)) = 1 + x1   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(36) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FST(X1, mark(X2)) → FST(X1, X2)
FST(X1, active(X2)) → FST(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(37) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


FST(X1, mark(X2)) → FST(X1, X2)
FST(X1, active(X2)) → FST(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(FST(x1, x2)) = x2   
POL(active(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL(mark(x1)) = 1 + x1   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(38) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(39) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(40) TRUE

(41) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → MARK(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
MARK(fst(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → MARK(cons(X, from(s(X))))
MARK(fst(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(fst(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(X))
ACTIVE(add(0, X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → MARK(s(add(X, Y)))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(from(X)) → ACTIVE(from(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(len(cons(X, Z))) → MARK(s(len(Z)))
MARK(from(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(len(X)) → ACTIVE(len(mark(X)))
MARK(len(X)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(42) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MARK(fst(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(fst(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(fst(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(X))
ACTIVE(add(0, X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(from(X)) → ACTIVE(from(mark(X)))
MARK(from(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(len(X)) → ACTIVE(len(mark(X)))
MARK(len(X)) → MARK(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(0) = 1   
POL(ACTIVE(x1)) = x1   
POL(MARK(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL(active(x1)) = x1   
POL(add(x1, x2)) = 1 + x1 + x2   
POL(cons(x1, x2)) = x1   
POL(from(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL(fst(x1, x2)) = 1 + x1 + x2   
POL(len(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL(mark(x1)) = x1   
POL(nil) = 1   
POL(s(x1)) = 0   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(active(X)) → len(X)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)

(43) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → MARK(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → MARK(cons(X, from(s(X))))
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → MARK(s(add(X, Y)))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(len(cons(X, Z))) → MARK(s(len(Z)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(44) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 4 less nodes.

(45) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(46) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(MARK(x1)) = x1   
POL(cons(x1, x2)) = 1 + x1   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(47) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(48) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(49) TRUE