Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS
↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)
↳2 QDP
↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
↳4 AND
    ↳5 QDP
        ↳6 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳7 QDP
        ↳8 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳9 QDP
        ↳10 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
        ↳11 TRUE
    ↳12 QDP
        ↳13 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳14 QDP
        ↳15 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳16 QDP
        ↳17 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳18 QDP
        ↳19 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳20 QDP
        ↳21 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
        ↳22 TRUE
    ↳23 QDP
        ↳24 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳25 QDP
        ↳26 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳27 QDP
        ↳28 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
        ↳29 TRUE
    ↳30 QDP
        ↳31 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳32 QDP
        ↳33 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳34 QDP
        ↳35 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳36 QDP
        ↳37 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳38 QDP
        ↳39 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
        ↳40 TRUE
    ↳41 QDP
        ↳42 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳43 QDP
        ↳44 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳45 QDP
        ↳46 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
        ↳47 TRUE
    ↳48 QDP
        ↳49 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳50 QDP
        ↳51 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳52 QDP
        ↳53 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳54 QDP
        ↳55 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳56 QDP
        ↳57 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
        ↳58 TRUE
    ↳59 QDP
        ↳60 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳61 QDP
        ↳62 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳63 QDP
        ↳64 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
        ↳65 QDP
        ↳66 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳67 QDP
        ↳68 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
        ↳69 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(fst(0, Z)) → MARK(nil)
ACTIVE(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → MARK(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
ACTIVE(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → CONS(Y, fst(X, Z))
ACTIVE(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → FST(X, Z)
ACTIVE(from(X)) → MARK(cons(X, from(s(X))))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → CONS(X, from(s(X)))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → FROM(s(X))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → S(X)
ACTIVE(add(0, X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → MARK(s(add(X, Y)))
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → S(add(X, Y))
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → ADD(X, Y)
ACTIVE(len(nil)) → MARK(0)
ACTIVE(len(cons(X, Z))) → MARK(s(len(Z)))
ACTIVE(len(cons(X, Z))) → S(len(Z))
ACTIVE(len(cons(X, Z))) → LEN(Z)
MARK(fst(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(fst(X1, X2)) → FST(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(fst(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(fst(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(0) → ACTIVE(0)
MARK(nil) → ACTIVE(nil)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(X))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → CONS(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(from(X)) → ACTIVE(from(mark(X)))
MARK(from(X)) → FROM(mark(X))
MARK(from(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ADD(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(len(X)) → ACTIVE(len(mark(X)))
MARK(len(X)) → LEN(mark(X))
MARK(len(X)) → MARK(X)
FST(mark(X1), X2) → FST(X1, X2)
FST(X1, mark(X2)) → FST(X1, X2)
FST(active(X1), X2) → FST(X1, X2)
FST(X1, active(X2)) → FST(X1, X2)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
S(active(X)) → S(X)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
FROM(mark(X)) → FROM(X)
FROM(active(X)) → FROM(X)
ADD(mark(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(X1, mark(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(active(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(X1, active(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
LEN(mark(X)) → LEN(X)
LEN(active(X)) → LEN(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 7 SCCs with 18 less nodes.

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LEN(active(X)) → LEN(X)
LEN(mark(X)) → LEN(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


LEN(active(X)) → LEN(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
LEN(x1)  =  x1
active(x1)  =  active(x1)
mark(x1)  =  x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
active1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LEN(mark(X)) → LEN(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


LEN(mark(X)) → LEN(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
LEN(x1)  =  x1
mark(x1)  =  mark(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
mark1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(9) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(10) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(11) TRUE

(12) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ADD(X1, mark(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(mark(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(active(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(X1, active(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(13) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


ADD(X1, mark(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
ADD(x1, x2)  =  ADD(x2)
mark(x1)  =  mark(x1)
active(x1)  =  x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
ADD1: [1]
mark1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(14) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ADD(mark(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(active(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(X1, active(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(15) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


ADD(mark(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
ADD(x1, x2)  =  ADD(x1, x2)
mark(x1)  =  mark(x1)
active(x1)  =  x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[ADD2, mark1]

Status:
ADD2: [2,1]
mark1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(16) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ADD(active(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(X1, active(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(17) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


ADD(X1, active(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
ADD(x1, x2)  =  x2
active(x1)  =  active(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
active1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(18) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ADD(active(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(19) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


ADD(active(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[ADD2, active1]

Status:
ADD2: [2,1]
active1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(20) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(21) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(22) TRUE

(23) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FROM(active(X)) → FROM(X)
FROM(mark(X)) → FROM(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(24) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


FROM(active(X)) → FROM(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
FROM(x1)  =  x1
active(x1)  =  active(x1)
mark(x1)  =  x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
active1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(25) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FROM(mark(X)) → FROM(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(26) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


FROM(mark(X)) → FROM(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
FROM(x1)  =  x1
mark(x1)  =  mark(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
mark1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(27) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(28) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(29) TRUE

(30) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(31) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
CONS(x1, x2)  =  CONS(x2)
mark(x1)  =  mark(x1)
active(x1)  =  x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
CONS1: [1]
mark1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(32) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(33) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
CONS(x1, x2)  =  CONS(x1, x2)
mark(x1)  =  mark(x1)
active(x1)  =  x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[CONS2, mark1]

Status:
CONS2: [2,1]
mark1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(34) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(35) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
CONS(x1, x2)  =  x2
active(x1)  =  active(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
active1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(36) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(37) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[CONS2, active1]

Status:
CONS2: [2,1]
active1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(38) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(39) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(40) TRUE

(41) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(active(X)) → S(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(42) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


S(active(X)) → S(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
S(x1)  =  x1
active(x1)  =  active(x1)
mark(x1)  =  x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
active1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(43) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(44) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


S(mark(X)) → S(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
S(x1)  =  x1
mark(x1)  =  mark(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
mark1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(45) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(46) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(47) TRUE

(48) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FST(X1, mark(X2)) → FST(X1, X2)
FST(mark(X1), X2) → FST(X1, X2)
FST(active(X1), X2) → FST(X1, X2)
FST(X1, active(X2)) → FST(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(49) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


FST(X1, mark(X2)) → FST(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
FST(x1, x2)  =  FST(x2)
mark(x1)  =  mark(x1)
active(x1)  =  x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
FST1: [1]
mark1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(50) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FST(mark(X1), X2) → FST(X1, X2)
FST(active(X1), X2) → FST(X1, X2)
FST(X1, active(X2)) → FST(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(51) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


FST(mark(X1), X2) → FST(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
FST(x1, x2)  =  FST(x1, x2)
mark(x1)  =  mark(x1)
active(x1)  =  x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[FST2, mark1]

Status:
FST2: [2,1]
mark1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(52) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FST(active(X1), X2) → FST(X1, X2)
FST(X1, active(X2)) → FST(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(53) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


FST(X1, active(X2)) → FST(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
FST(x1, x2)  =  x2
active(x1)  =  active(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
active1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(54) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FST(active(X1), X2) → FST(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(55) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


FST(active(X1), X2) → FST(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[FST2, active1]

Status:
FST2: [2,1]
active1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(56) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(57) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(58) TRUE

(59) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → MARK(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
MARK(fst(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → MARK(cons(X, from(s(X))))
MARK(fst(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(fst(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(X))
ACTIVE(add(0, X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → MARK(s(add(X, Y)))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(from(X)) → ACTIVE(from(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(len(cons(X, Z))) → MARK(s(len(Z)))
MARK(from(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(len(X)) → ACTIVE(len(mark(X)))
MARK(len(X)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(60) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
ACTIVE(x1)  =  x1
fst(x1, x2)  =  fst
s(x1)  =  s
cons(x1, x2)  =  cons
MARK(x1)  =  MARK
mark(x1)  =  mark(x1)
from(x1)  =  from
add(x1, x2)  =  add
0  =  0
len(x1)  =  len
active(x1)  =  active
nil  =  nil

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
mark1 > [fst, s, MARK, from, add, len, nil] > [0, active] > cons

Status:
fst: []
s: []
cons: []
MARK: []
mark1: [1]
from: []
add: []
0: []
len: []
active: []
nil: []


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(active(X)) → len(X)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)

(61) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → MARK(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
MARK(fst(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → MARK(cons(X, from(s(X))))
MARK(fst(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(fst(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(X))
ACTIVE(add(0, X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → MARK(s(add(X, Y)))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(from(X)) → ACTIVE(from(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(len(cons(X, Z))) → MARK(s(len(Z)))
MARK(from(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(len(X)) → ACTIVE(len(mark(X)))
MARK(len(X)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(62) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


ACTIVE(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → MARK(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → MARK(cons(X, from(s(X))))
MARK(fst(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(fst(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
ACTIVE(add(0, X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → MARK(s(add(X, Y)))
ACTIVE(len(cons(X, Z))) → MARK(s(len(Z)))
MARK(from(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(len(X)) → MARK(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
ACTIVE(x1)  =  ACTIVE(x1)
fst(x1, x2)  =  fst(x1, x2)
s(x1)  =  s
cons(x1, x2)  =  x1
MARK(x1)  =  MARK(x1)
mark(x1)  =  x1
from(x1)  =  from(x1)
add(x1, x2)  =  add(x1, x2)
0  =  0
len(x1)  =  len(x1)
active(x1)  =  x1
nil  =  nil

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[ACTIVE1, MARK1] > len1 > [s, from1, add2] > fst2 > nil > 0

Status:
ACTIVE1: [1]
fst2: [1,2]
s: []
MARK1: [1]
from1: [1]
add2: [1,2]
0: []
len1: [1]
nil: []


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(active(X)) → len(X)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)

(63) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(fst(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(X))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(from(X)) → ACTIVE(from(mark(X)))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(len(X)) → ACTIVE(len(mark(X)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(64) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 5 less nodes.

(65) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(66) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MARK(x1)  =  x1
cons(x1, x2)  =  cons(x1, x2)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
cons2: [2,1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(67) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fst(0, Z)) → mark(nil)
active(fst(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, fst(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(len(nil)) → mark(0)
active(len(cons(X, Z))) → mark(s(len(Z)))
mark(fst(X1, X2)) → active(fst(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(len(X)) → active(len(mark(X)))
fst(mark(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, mark(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(active(X1), X2) → fst(X1, X2)
fst(X1, active(X2)) → fst(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
len(mark(X)) → len(X)
len(active(X)) → len(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(68) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(69) TRUE