Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS
↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)
↳2 QDP
↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
↳4 AND
    ↳5 QDP
        ↳6 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳7 QDP
        ↳8 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
        ↳9 TRUE
    ↳10 QDP
        ↳11 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳12 QDP
        ↳13 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
        ↳14 TRUE
    ↳15 QDP
        ↳16 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳17 QDP
        ↳18 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
        ↳19 TRUE
    ↳20 QDP
        ↳21 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳22 QDP
        ↳23 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
        ↳24 TRUE
    ↳25 QDP
        ↳26 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳27 QDP
        ↳28 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
        ↳29 TRUE
    ↳30 QDP
        ↳31 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳32 QDP
        ↳33 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳34 QDP
        ↳35 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
        ↳36 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(f(f(a))) → mark(c(f(g(f(a)))))
active(f(X)) → f(active(X))
active(g(X)) → g(active(X))
f(mark(X)) → mark(f(X))
g(mark(X)) → mark(g(X))
proper(f(X)) → f(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(c(X)) → c(proper(X))
proper(g(X)) → g(proper(X))
f(ok(X)) → ok(f(X))
c(ok(X)) → ok(c(X))
g(ok(X)) → ok(g(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(f(f(a))) → C(f(g(f(a))))
ACTIVE(f(f(a))) → F(g(f(a)))
ACTIVE(f(f(a))) → G(f(a))
ACTIVE(f(X)) → F(active(X))
ACTIVE(f(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(g(X)) → G(active(X))
ACTIVE(g(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
F(mark(X)) → F(X)
G(mark(X)) → G(X)
PROPER(f(X)) → F(proper(X))
PROPER(f(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(c(X)) → C(proper(X))
PROPER(c(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(g(X)) → G(proper(X))
PROPER(g(X)) → PROPER(X)
F(ok(X)) → F(X)
C(ok(X)) → C(X)
G(ok(X)) → G(X)
TOP(mark(X)) → TOP(proper(X))
TOP(mark(X)) → PROPER(X)
TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))
TOP(ok(X)) → ACTIVE(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(f(f(a))) → mark(c(f(g(f(a)))))
active(f(X)) → f(active(X))
active(g(X)) → g(active(X))
f(mark(X)) → mark(f(X))
g(mark(X)) → mark(g(X))
proper(f(X)) → f(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(c(X)) → c(proper(X))
proper(g(X)) → g(proper(X))
f(ok(X)) → ok(f(X))
c(ok(X)) → ok(c(X))
g(ok(X)) → ok(g(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 6 SCCs with 10 less nodes.

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

C(ok(X)) → C(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(f(f(a))) → mark(c(f(g(f(a)))))
active(f(X)) → f(active(X))
active(g(X)) → g(active(X))
f(mark(X)) → mark(f(X))
g(mark(X)) → mark(g(X))
proper(f(X)) → f(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(c(X)) → c(proper(X))
proper(g(X)) → g(proper(X))
f(ok(X)) → ok(f(X))
c(ok(X)) → ok(c(X))
g(ok(X)) → ok(g(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


C(ok(X)) → C(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(C(x1)) = x1   
POL(ok(x1)) = 1 + x1   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(f(f(a))) → mark(c(f(g(f(a)))))
active(f(X)) → f(active(X))
active(g(X)) → g(active(X))
f(mark(X)) → mark(f(X))
g(mark(X)) → mark(g(X))
proper(f(X)) → f(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(c(X)) → c(proper(X))
proper(g(X)) → g(proper(X))
f(ok(X)) → ok(f(X))
c(ok(X)) → ok(c(X))
g(ok(X)) → ok(g(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(9) TRUE

(10) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

G(ok(X)) → G(X)
G(mark(X)) → G(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(f(f(a))) → mark(c(f(g(f(a)))))
active(f(X)) → f(active(X))
active(g(X)) → g(active(X))
f(mark(X)) → mark(f(X))
g(mark(X)) → mark(g(X))
proper(f(X)) → f(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(c(X)) → c(proper(X))
proper(g(X)) → g(proper(X))
f(ok(X)) → ok(f(X))
c(ok(X)) → ok(c(X))
g(ok(X)) → ok(g(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(11) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


G(ok(X)) → G(X)
G(mark(X)) → G(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(G(x1)) = x1   
POL(mark(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL(ok(x1)) = 1 + x1   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(12) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(f(f(a))) → mark(c(f(g(f(a)))))
active(f(X)) → f(active(X))
active(g(X)) → g(active(X))
f(mark(X)) → mark(f(X))
g(mark(X)) → mark(g(X))
proper(f(X)) → f(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(c(X)) → c(proper(X))
proper(g(X)) → g(proper(X))
f(ok(X)) → ok(f(X))
c(ok(X)) → ok(c(X))
g(ok(X)) → ok(g(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(13) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(14) TRUE

(15) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

F(ok(X)) → F(X)
F(mark(X)) → F(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(f(f(a))) → mark(c(f(g(f(a)))))
active(f(X)) → f(active(X))
active(g(X)) → g(active(X))
f(mark(X)) → mark(f(X))
g(mark(X)) → mark(g(X))
proper(f(X)) → f(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(c(X)) → c(proper(X))
proper(g(X)) → g(proper(X))
f(ok(X)) → ok(f(X))
c(ok(X)) → ok(c(X))
g(ok(X)) → ok(g(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(16) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


F(ok(X)) → F(X)
F(mark(X)) → F(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(F(x1)) = x1   
POL(mark(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL(ok(x1)) = 1 + x1   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(17) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(f(f(a))) → mark(c(f(g(f(a)))))
active(f(X)) → f(active(X))
active(g(X)) → g(active(X))
f(mark(X)) → mark(f(X))
g(mark(X)) → mark(g(X))
proper(f(X)) → f(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(c(X)) → c(proper(X))
proper(g(X)) → g(proper(X))
f(ok(X)) → ok(f(X))
c(ok(X)) → ok(c(X))
g(ok(X)) → ok(g(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(18) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(19) TRUE

(20) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PROPER(c(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(f(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(g(X)) → PROPER(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(f(f(a))) → mark(c(f(g(f(a)))))
active(f(X)) → f(active(X))
active(g(X)) → g(active(X))
f(mark(X)) → mark(f(X))
g(mark(X)) → mark(g(X))
proper(f(X)) → f(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(c(X)) → c(proper(X))
proper(g(X)) → g(proper(X))
f(ok(X)) → ok(f(X))
c(ok(X)) → ok(c(X))
g(ok(X)) → ok(g(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(21) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


PROPER(c(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(f(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(g(X)) → PROPER(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(PROPER(x1)) = x1   
POL(c(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL(f(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL(g(x1)) = 1 + x1   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(22) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(f(f(a))) → mark(c(f(g(f(a)))))
active(f(X)) → f(active(X))
active(g(X)) → g(active(X))
f(mark(X)) → mark(f(X))
g(mark(X)) → mark(g(X))
proper(f(X)) → f(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(c(X)) → c(proper(X))
proper(g(X)) → g(proper(X))
f(ok(X)) → ok(f(X))
c(ok(X)) → ok(c(X))
g(ok(X)) → ok(g(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(23) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(24) TRUE

(25) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(g(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(f(X)) → ACTIVE(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(f(f(a))) → mark(c(f(g(f(a)))))
active(f(X)) → f(active(X))
active(g(X)) → g(active(X))
f(mark(X)) → mark(f(X))
g(mark(X)) → mark(g(X))
proper(f(X)) → f(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(c(X)) → c(proper(X))
proper(g(X)) → g(proper(X))
f(ok(X)) → ok(f(X))
c(ok(X)) → ok(c(X))
g(ok(X)) → ok(g(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(26) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


ACTIVE(g(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(f(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(ACTIVE(x1)) = x1   
POL(f(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL(g(x1)) = 1 + x1   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(27) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(f(f(a))) → mark(c(f(g(f(a)))))
active(f(X)) → f(active(X))
active(g(X)) → g(active(X))
f(mark(X)) → mark(f(X))
g(mark(X)) → mark(g(X))
proper(f(X)) → f(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(c(X)) → c(proper(X))
proper(g(X)) → g(proper(X))
f(ok(X)) → ok(f(X))
c(ok(X)) → ok(c(X))
g(ok(X)) → ok(g(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(28) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(29) TRUE

(30) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))
TOP(mark(X)) → TOP(proper(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(f(f(a))) → mark(c(f(g(f(a)))))
active(f(X)) → f(active(X))
active(g(X)) → g(active(X))
f(mark(X)) → mark(f(X))
g(mark(X)) → mark(g(X))
proper(f(X)) → f(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(c(X)) → c(proper(X))
proper(g(X)) → g(proper(X))
f(ok(X)) → ok(f(X))
c(ok(X)) → ok(c(X))
g(ok(X)) → ok(g(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(31) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


TOP(mark(X)) → TOP(proper(X))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(TOP(x1)) = x1   
POL(a) = 0   
POL(active(x1)) = x1   
POL(c(x1)) = 1   
POL(f(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL(g(x1)) = x1   
POL(mark(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL(ok(x1)) = x1   
POL(proper(x1)) = x1   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

active(f(f(a))) → mark(c(f(g(f(a)))))
active(f(X)) → f(active(X))
active(g(X)) → g(active(X))
proper(f(X)) → f(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(c(X)) → c(proper(X))
proper(g(X)) → g(proper(X))
g(mark(X)) → mark(g(X))
g(ok(X)) → ok(g(X))
f(mark(X)) → mark(f(X))
f(ok(X)) → ok(f(X))
c(ok(X)) → ok(c(X))

(32) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(f(f(a))) → mark(c(f(g(f(a)))))
active(f(X)) → f(active(X))
active(g(X)) → g(active(X))
f(mark(X)) → mark(f(X))
g(mark(X)) → mark(g(X))
proper(f(X)) → f(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(c(X)) → c(proper(X))
proper(g(X)) → g(proper(X))
f(ok(X)) → ok(f(X))
c(ok(X)) → ok(c(X))
g(ok(X)) → ok(g(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(33) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(TOP(x1)) = x1   
POL(a) = 0   
POL(active(x1)) = 0   
POL(c(x1)) = 0   
POL(f(x1)) = x1   
POL(g(x1)) = x1   
POL(mark(x1)) = 0   
POL(ok(x1)) = 1   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

active(f(f(a))) → mark(c(f(g(f(a)))))
active(f(X)) → f(active(X))
active(g(X)) → g(active(X))
g(mark(X)) → mark(g(X))
g(ok(X)) → ok(g(X))
f(mark(X)) → mark(f(X))
f(ok(X)) → ok(f(X))

(34) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(f(f(a))) → mark(c(f(g(f(a)))))
active(f(X)) → f(active(X))
active(g(X)) → g(active(X))
f(mark(X)) → mark(f(X))
g(mark(X)) → mark(g(X))
proper(f(X)) → f(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(c(X)) → c(proper(X))
proper(g(X)) → g(proper(X))
f(ok(X)) → ok(f(X))
c(ok(X)) → ok(c(X))
g(ok(X)) → ok(g(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(35) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(36) TRUE