Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS
↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)
↳2 QDP
↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
↳4 AND
    ↳5 QDP
        ↳6 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔)
        ↳7 TRUE
    ↳8 QDP
        ↳9 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔)
        ↳10 TRUE
    ↳11 QDP
        ↳12 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔)
        ↳13 TRUE
    ↳14 QDP
        ↳15 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔)
        ↳16 TRUE
    ↳17 QDP
        ↳18 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔)
        ↳19 TRUE
    ↳20 QDP
        ↳21 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔)
        ↳22 TRUE
    ↳23 QDP
        ↳24 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔)
        ↳25 TRUE
    ↳26 QDP
        ↳27 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔)
        ↳28 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(X))
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(and(true, X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(and(false, Y)) → MARK(false)
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
ACTIVE(add(0, X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → MARK(s(add(X, Y)))
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → S(add(X, Y))
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → ADD(X, Y)
ACTIVE(first(0, X)) → MARK(nil)
ACTIVE(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → MARK(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
ACTIVE(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → CONS(Y, first(X, Z))
ACTIVE(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → FIRST(X, Z)
ACTIVE(from(X)) → MARK(cons(X, from(s(X))))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → CONS(X, from(s(X)))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → FROM(s(X))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → S(X)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → AND(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(true) → ACTIVE(true)
MARK(false) → ACTIVE(false)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → IF(mark(X1), X2, X3)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ADD(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(0) → ACTIVE(0)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(X))
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → FIRST(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(nil) → ACTIVE(nil)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2))
MARK(from(X)) → ACTIVE(from(X))
AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(X1, mark(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(active(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(X1, active(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
IF(mark(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, mark(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(active(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, active(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, X2, active(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
ADD(mark(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(X1, mark(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(active(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(X1, active(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
S(active(X)) → S(X)
FIRST(mark(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)
FIRST(X1, mark(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)
FIRST(active(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)
FIRST(X1, active(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
FROM(mark(X)) → FROM(X)
FROM(active(X)) → FROM(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(X))
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 8 SCCs with 17 less nodes.

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FROM(active(X)) → FROM(X)
FROM(mark(X)) → FROM(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(X))
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(6) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We used the following order and afs together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] to show that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

Order:Homeomorphic Embedding Order

AFS:
active(x1)  =  active(x1)
mark(x1)  =  mark(x1)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • FROM(active(X)) → FROM(X) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

  • FROM(mark(X)) → FROM(X) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

We oriented the following set of usable rules [AAECC05,FROCOS05]. none

(7) TRUE

(8) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(X))
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(9) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We used the following order and afs together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] to show that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

Order:Homeomorphic Embedding Order

AFS:
active(x1)  =  active(x1)
mark(x1)  =  mark(x1)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1, 2})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2

  • CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1, 2})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2

  • CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1, 2})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2

  • CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1, 2})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2

We oriented the following set of usable rules [AAECC05,FROCOS05]. none

(10) TRUE

(11) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FIRST(X1, mark(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)
FIRST(mark(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)
FIRST(active(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)
FIRST(X1, active(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(X))
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(12) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We used the following order and afs together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] to show that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

Order:Homeomorphic Embedding Order

AFS:
active(x1)  =  active(x1)
mark(x1)  =  mark(x1)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • FIRST(X1, mark(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1, 2})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2

  • FIRST(mark(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1, 2})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2

  • FIRST(active(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1, 2})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2

  • FIRST(X1, active(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1, 2})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2

We oriented the following set of usable rules [AAECC05,FROCOS05]. none

(13) TRUE

(14) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(active(X)) → S(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(X))
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(15) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We used the following order and afs together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] to show that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

Order:Homeomorphic Embedding Order

AFS:
active(x1)  =  active(x1)
mark(x1)  =  mark(x1)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • S(active(X)) → S(X) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

  • S(mark(X)) → S(X) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

We oriented the following set of usable rules [AAECC05,FROCOS05]. none

(16) TRUE

(17) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ADD(X1, mark(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(mark(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(active(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(X1, active(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(X))
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(18) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We used the following order and afs together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] to show that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

Order:Homeomorphic Embedding Order

AFS:
active(x1)  =  active(x1)
mark(x1)  =  mark(x1)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • ADD(X1, mark(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1, 2})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2

  • ADD(mark(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1, 2})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2

  • ADD(active(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1, 2})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2

  • ADD(X1, active(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1, 2})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2

We oriented the following set of usable rules [AAECC05,FROCOS05]. none

(19) TRUE

(20) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

IF(X1, mark(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(mark(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(active(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, active(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, X2, active(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(X))
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(21) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We used the following order and afs together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] to show that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

Order:Homeomorphic Embedding Order

AFS:
active(x1)  =  active(x1)
mark(x1)  =  mark(x1)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • IF(X1, mark(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1, 2, 3})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2, 3 >= 3

  • IF(mark(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1, 2, 3})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2, 3 >= 3

  • IF(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1, 2, 3})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 >= 2, 3 > 3

  • IF(active(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1, 2, 3})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2, 3 >= 3

  • IF(X1, active(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1, 2, 3})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2, 3 >= 3

  • IF(X1, X2, active(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1, 2, 3})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 >= 2, 3 > 3

We oriented the following set of usable rules [AAECC05,FROCOS05]. none

(22) TRUE

(23) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

AND(X1, mark(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(active(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(X1, active(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(X))
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(24) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We used the following order and afs together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] to show that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

Order:Homeomorphic Embedding Order

AFS:
active(x1)  =  active(x1)
mark(x1)  =  mark(x1)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • AND(X1, mark(X2)) → AND(X1, X2) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1, 2})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2

  • AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1, 2})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2

  • AND(active(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1, 2})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2

  • AND(X1, active(X2)) → AND(X1, X2) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1, 2})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2

We oriented the following set of usable rules [AAECC05,FROCOS05]. none

(25) TRUE

(26) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(and(true, X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(X))
ACTIVE(add(0, X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → MARK(s(add(X, Y)))
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2))
ACTIVE(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → MARK(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
MARK(from(X)) → ACTIVE(from(X))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → MARK(cons(X, from(s(X))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(X))
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(27) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We used the following order and afs together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] to show that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

Order:Combined order from the following AFS and order.
s(x1)  =  s
mark(x1)  =  x1
active(x1)  =  x1
true  =  true
nil  =  nil
if(x1, x2, x3)  =  if(x1, x2, x3)
from(x1)  =  from(x1)
first(x1, x2)  =  first(x1, x2)
false  =  false
cons(x1, x2)  =  x1
and(x1, x2)  =  and(x1, x2)
add(x1, x2)  =  add(x1, x2)
0  =  0

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

from1 > s > first2 > nil
from1 > s > add2
and2 > false

Status:
s: []
true: multiset
nil: multiset
if3: [2,1,3]
from1: multiset
first2: [1,2]
false: multiset
and2: [2,1]
add2: [2,1]
0: multiset

AFS:
s(x1)  =  s
mark(x1)  =  x1
active(x1)  =  x1
true  =  true
nil  =  nil
if(x1, x2, x3)  =  if(x1, x2, x3)
from(x1)  =  from(x1)
first(x1, x2)  =  first(x1, x2)
false  =  false
cons(x1, x2)  =  x1
and(x1, x2)  =  and(x1, x2)
add(x1, x2)  =  add(x1, x2)
0  =  0

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • ACTIVE(and(true, X)) → MARK(X) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

  • ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

  • ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

  • ACTIVE(add(0, X)) → MARK(X) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

  • ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → MARK(s(add(X, Y))) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

  • ACTIVE(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → MARK(cons(Y, first(X, Z))) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

  • ACTIVE(from(X)) → MARK(cons(X, from(s(X)))) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

  • MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

  • MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

  • MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

  • MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

  • MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

  • MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2)) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1

  • MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3)) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1

  • MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), X2)) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1

  • MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(X)) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1

  • MARK(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(first(mark(X1), mark(X2))) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1

  • MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1

  • MARK(from(X)) → ACTIVE(from(X)) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1

We oriented the following set of usable rules [AAECC05,FROCOS05].


s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(X))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)

(28) TRUE