Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmpCvzh7i/Ex15_Luc98

Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS

↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)

↳2 QDP

↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

↳4 QDP

↳5 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

↳6 QDP

↳7 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

↳8 QDP

↳9 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

↳10 QDP

↳11 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

↳12 QDP

↳13 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

↳14 QDP

↳15 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

↳16 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__and(true, X) → mark(X)
a__and(false, Y) → false
a__if(true, X, Y) → mark(X)
a__if(false, X, Y) → mark(Y)
a__add(0, X) → mark(X)
a__add(s(X), Y) → s(add(X, Y))
a__first(0, X) → nil
a__first(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) → cons(Y, first(X, Z))
a__from(X) → cons(X, from(s(X)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → a__and(mark(X1), X2)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → a__if(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → a__add(mark(X1), X2)
mark(first(X1, X2)) → a__first(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(from(X)) → a__from(X)
mark(true) → true
mark(false) → false
mark(0) → 0
mark(s(X)) → s(X)
mark(nil) → nil
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
a__and(X1, X2) → and(X1, X2)
a__if(X1, X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
a__add(X1, X2) → add(X1, X2)
a__first(X1, X2) → first(X1, X2)
a__from(X) → from(X)

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

A__AND(true, X) → MARK(X)
A__IF(true, X, Y) → MARK(X)
A__IF(false, X, Y) → MARK(Y)
A__ADD(0, X) → MARK(X)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → A__AND(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → A__IF(mark(X1), X2, X3)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → A__ADD(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → A__FIRST(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(from(X)) → A__FROM(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__and(true, X) → mark(X)
a__and(false, Y) → false
a__if(true, X, Y) → mark(X)
a__if(false, X, Y) → mark(Y)
a__add(0, X) → mark(X)
a__add(s(X), Y) → s(add(X, Y))
a__first(0, X) → nil
a__first(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) → cons(Y, first(X, Z))
a__from(X) → cons(X, from(s(X)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → a__and(mark(X1), X2)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → a__if(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → a__add(mark(X1), X2)
mark(first(X1, X2)) → a__first(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(from(X)) → a__from(X)
mark(true) → true
mark(false) → false
mark(0) → 0
mark(s(X)) → s(X)
mark(nil) → nil
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
a__and(X1, X2) → and(X1, X2)
a__if(X1, X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
a__add(X1, X2) → add(X1, X2)
a__first(X1, X2) → first(X1, X2)
a__from(X) → from(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 2 less nodes.

(4) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(and(X1, X2)) → A__AND(mark(X1), X2)
A__AND(true, X) → MARK(X)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → A__IF(mark(X1), X2, X3)
A__IF(true, X, Y) → MARK(X)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → A__ADD(mark(X1), X2)
A__ADD(0, X) → MARK(X)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
A__IF(false, X, Y) → MARK(Y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__and(true, X) → mark(X)
a__and(false, Y) → false
a__if(true, X, Y) → mark(X)
a__if(false, X, Y) → mark(Y)
a__add(0, X) → mark(X)
a__add(s(X), Y) → s(add(X, Y))
a__first(0, X) → nil
a__first(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) → cons(Y, first(X, Z))
a__from(X) → cons(X, from(s(X)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → a__and(mark(X1), X2)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → a__if(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → a__add(mark(X1), X2)
mark(first(X1, X2)) → a__first(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(from(X)) → a__from(X)
mark(true) → true
mark(false) → false
mark(0) → 0
mark(s(X)) → s(X)
mark(nil) → nil
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
a__and(X1, X2) → and(X1, X2)
a__if(X1, X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
a__add(X1, X2) → add(X1, X2)
a__first(X1, X2) → first(X1, X2)
a__from(X) → from(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(add(X1, X2)) → A__ADD(mark(X1), X2)
A__ADD(0, X) → MARK(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
MARK(x0, x1) = MARK(x1)
A__AND(x0, x1, x2) = A__AND(x0)
A__IF(x0, x1, x2, x3) = A__IF(x0)
A__ADD(x0, x1, x2) = A__ADD(x0, x2)

Tags:
MARK has argument tags [0,0] and root tag 0
A__AND has argument tags [0,14,8] and root tag 0
A__IF has argument tags [0,8,0,0] and root tag 0
A__ADD has argument tags [0,9,7] and root tag 1

Comparison: DMS
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(0) = 1
POL(A__ADD(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(A__AND(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(A__IF(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = x₂ + x₃
POL(MARK(x₁)) = 1
POL(a__add(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(a__and(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(a__first(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(a__from(x₁)) = 0
POL(a__if(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = x₁ + x₂ + x₃
POL(add(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(false) = 0
POL(first(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(from(x₁)) = 0
POL(if(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = x₁ + x₂ + x₃
POL(mark(x₁)) = x₁
POL(nil) = 0
POL(s(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(true) = 0

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

mark(and(X1, X2)) → a__and(mark(X1), X2)
a__and(true, X) → mark(X)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → a__if(mark(X1), X2, X3)
a__if(true, X, Y) → mark(X)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → a__add(mark(X1), X2)
a__add(0, X) → mark(X)
a__if(false, X, Y) → mark(Y)
mark(first(X1, X2)) → a__first(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(from(X)) → a__from(X)
mark(true) → true
mark(false) → false
mark(0) → 0
mark(s(X)) → s(X)
mark(nil) → nil
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
a__first(0, X) → nil
a__first(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) → cons(Y, first(X, Z))
a__first(X1, X2) → first(X1, X2)
a__and(false, Y) → false
a__and(X1, X2) → and(X1, X2)
a__if(X1, X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
a__add(s(X), Y) → s(add(X, Y))
a__add(X1, X2) → add(X1, X2)
a__from(X) → cons(X, from(s(X)))
a__from(X) → from(X)

(6) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(and(X1, X2)) → A__AND(mark(X1), X2)
A__AND(true, X) → MARK(X)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → A__IF(mark(X1), X2, X3)
A__IF(true, X, Y) → MARK(X)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
A__IF(false, X, Y) → MARK(Y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__and(true, X) → mark(X)
a__and(false, Y) → false
a__if(true, X, Y) → mark(X)
a__if(false, X, Y) → mark(Y)
a__add(0, X) → mark(X)
a__add(s(X), Y) → s(add(X, Y))
a__first(0, X) → nil
a__first(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) → cons(Y, first(X, Z))
a__from(X) → cons(X, from(s(X)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → a__and(mark(X1), X2)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → a__if(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → a__add(mark(X1), X2)
mark(first(X1, X2)) → a__first(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(from(X)) → a__from(X)
mark(true) → true
mark(false) → false
mark(0) → 0
mark(s(X)) → s(X)
mark(nil) → nil
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
a__and(X1, X2) → and(X1, X2)
a__if(X1, X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
a__add(X1, X2) → add(X1, X2)
a__first(X1, X2) → first(X1, X2)
a__from(X) → from(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(7) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
MARK(x0, x1) = MARK(x1)
A__AND(x0, x1, x2) = A__AND(x0, x2)
A__IF(x0, x1, x2, x3) = A__IF(x0)

Tags:
MARK has argument tags [10,1] and root tag 3
A__AND has argument tags [1,2,8] and root tag 3
A__IF has argument tags [1,13,12,4] and root tag 3

Comparison: MIN
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(A__AND(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(A__IF(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = x₂ + x₃
POL(MARK(x₁)) = 0
POL(a__add(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₂
POL(a__and(x₁, x₂)) = 1
POL(a__first(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(a__from(x₁)) = 1
POL(a__if(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 0
POL(add(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₂
POL(false) = 0
POL(first(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(from(x₁)) = x₁
POL(if(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = x₁ + x₂ + x₃
POL(mark(x₁)) = 0
POL(nil) = 1
POL(s(x₁)) = x₁
POL(true) = 0

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(8) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(and(X1, X2)) → A__AND(mark(X1), X2)
A__AND(true, X) → MARK(X)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → A__IF(mark(X1), X2, X3)
A__IF(true, X, Y) → MARK(X)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
A__IF(false, X, Y) → MARK(Y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__and(true, X) → mark(X)
a__and(false, Y) → false
a__if(true, X, Y) → mark(X)
a__if(false, X, Y) → mark(Y)
a__add(0, X) → mark(X)
a__add(s(X), Y) → s(add(X, Y))
a__first(0, X) → nil
a__first(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) → cons(Y, first(X, Z))
a__from(X) → cons(X, from(s(X)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → a__and(mark(X1), X2)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → a__if(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → a__add(mark(X1), X2)
mark(first(X1, X2)) → a__first(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(from(X)) → a__from(X)
mark(true) → true
mark(false) → false
mark(0) → 0
mark(s(X)) → s(X)
mark(nil) → nil
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
a__and(X1, X2) → and(X1, X2)
a__if(X1, X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
a__add(X1, X2) → add(X1, X2)
a__first(X1, X2) → first(X1, X2)
a__from(X) → from(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(9) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → A__IF(mark(X1), X2, X3)
A__IF(true, X, Y) → MARK(X)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
A__IF(false, X, Y) → MARK(Y)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
MARK(x0, x1) = MARK(x1)
A__AND(x0, x1, x2) = A__AND(x0)
A__IF(x0, x1, x2, x3) = A__IF(x0, x2, x3)

Tags:
MARK has argument tags [8,0] and root tag 1
A__AND has argument tags [0,6,8] and root tag 1
A__IF has argument tags [8,7,0,15] and root tag 0

Comparison: MS
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(A__AND(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(A__IF(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 0
POL(MARK(x₁)) = 0
POL(a__add(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(a__and(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁
POL(a__first(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(a__from(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(a__if(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = x₂
POL(add(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(false) = 0
POL(first(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(from(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(if(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂ + x₃
POL(mark(x₁)) = 1
POL(nil) = 0
POL(s(x₁)) = 1
POL(true) = 0

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(10) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(and(X1, X2)) → A__AND(mark(X1), X2)
A__AND(true, X) → MARK(X)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__and(true, X) → mark(X)
a__and(false, Y) → false
a__if(true, X, Y) → mark(X)
a__if(false, X, Y) → mark(Y)
a__add(0, X) → mark(X)
a__add(s(X), Y) → s(add(X, Y))
a__first(0, X) → nil
a__first(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) → cons(Y, first(X, Z))
a__from(X) → cons(X, from(s(X)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → a__and(mark(X1), X2)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → a__if(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → a__add(mark(X1), X2)
mark(first(X1, X2)) → a__first(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(from(X)) → a__from(X)
mark(true) → true
mark(false) → false
mark(0) → 0
mark(s(X)) → s(X)
mark(nil) → nil
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
a__and(X1, X2) → and(X1, X2)
a__if(X1, X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
a__add(X1, X2) → add(X1, X2)
a__first(X1, X2) → first(X1, X2)
a__from(X) → from(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(11) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
MARK(x0, x1) = MARK(x1)
A__AND(x0, x1, x2) = A__AND(x0, x2)

Tags:
MARK has argument tags [1,1] and root tag 0
A__AND has argument tags [1,6,1] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(0) = 1
POL(A__AND(x₁, x₂)) = 1
POL(MARK(x₁)) = 1
POL(a__add(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(a__and(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(a__first(x₁, x₂)) = x₁
POL(a__from(x₁)) = 0
POL(a__if(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 0
POL(add(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(false) = 1
POL(first(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(from(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(if(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂ + x₃
POL(mark(x₁)) = 1
POL(nil) = 0
POL(s(x₁)) = 1
POL(true) = 1

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(12) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(and(X1, X2)) → A__AND(mark(X1), X2)
A__AND(true, X) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__and(true, X) → mark(X)
a__and(false, Y) → false
a__if(true, X, Y) → mark(X)
a__if(false, X, Y) → mark(Y)
a__add(0, X) → mark(X)
a__add(s(X), Y) → s(add(X, Y))
a__first(0, X) → nil
a__first(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) → cons(Y, first(X, Z))
a__from(X) → cons(X, from(s(X)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → a__and(mark(X1), X2)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → a__if(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → a__add(mark(X1), X2)
mark(first(X1, X2)) → a__first(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(from(X)) → a__from(X)
mark(true) → true
mark(false) → false
mark(0) → 0
mark(s(X)) → s(X)
mark(nil) → nil
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
a__and(X1, X2) → and(X1, X2)
a__if(X1, X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
a__add(X1, X2) → add(X1, X2)
a__first(X1, X2) → first(X1, X2)
a__from(X) → from(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(13) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

A__AND(true, X) → MARK(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
MARK(x0, x1) = MARK(x1)
A__AND(x0, x1, x2) = A__AND(x0, x2)

Tags:
MARK has argument tags [5,2] and root tag 0
A__AND has argument tags [2,3,4] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(0) = 1
POL(A__AND(x₁, x₂)) = 1
POL(MARK(x₁)) = 0
POL(a__add(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(a__and(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(a__first(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(a__from(x₁)) = 0
POL(a__if(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 0
POL(add(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(false) = 1
POL(first(x₁, x₂)) = x₁
POL(from(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(if(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂ + x₃
POL(mark(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(nil) = 0
POL(s(x₁)) = 1
POL(true) = 0

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(14) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(and(X1, X2)) → A__AND(mark(X1), X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__and(true, X) → mark(X)
a__and(false, Y) → false
a__if(true, X, Y) → mark(X)
a__if(false, X, Y) → mark(Y)
a__add(0, X) → mark(X)
a__add(s(X), Y) → s(add(X, Y))
a__first(0, X) → nil
a__first(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) → cons(Y, first(X, Z))
a__from(X) → cons(X, from(s(X)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → a__and(mark(X1), X2)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → a__if(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → a__add(mark(X1), X2)
mark(first(X1, X2)) → a__first(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(from(X)) → a__from(X)
mark(true) → true
mark(false) → false
mark(0) → 0
mark(s(X)) → s(X)
mark(nil) → nil
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
a__and(X1, X2) → and(X1, X2)
a__if(X1, X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
a__add(X1, X2) → add(X1, X2)
a__first(X1, X2) → first(X1, X2)
a__from(X) → from(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(15) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node.

(0) Obligation:

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(2) Obligation:

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(4) Obligation:

(5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(6) Obligation:

(7) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(8) Obligation:

(9) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(10) Obligation:

(11) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(12) Obligation:

(13) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(14) Obligation:

(15) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(16) TRUE