(0) Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
quot(0, s(y), s(z)) → 0
quot(s(x), s(y), z) → quot(x, y, z)
quot(x, 0, s(z)) → s(quot(x, s(z), s(z)))
Q is empty.
(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.
(2) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
QUOT(s(x), s(y), z) → QUOT(x, y, z)
QUOT(x, 0, s(z)) → QUOT(x, s(z), s(z))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
quot(0, s(y), s(z)) → 0
quot(s(x), s(y), z) → quot(x, y, z)
quot(x, 0, s(z)) → s(quot(x, s(z), s(z)))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(3) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].
The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
QUOT(s(x), s(y), z) → QUOT(x, y, z)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
QUOT(
x0,
x1,
x2,
x3) =
QUOT(
x1)
Tags:
QUOT has argument tags [3,0,1,3] and root tag 0
Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
QUOT(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
x2
s(
x1) =
s(
x1)
0 =
0
Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial
Status:
s1: [1]
0: []
The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:
none
(4) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
QUOT(x, 0, s(z)) → QUOT(x, s(z), s(z))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
quot(0, s(y), s(z)) → 0
quot(s(x), s(y), z) → quot(x, y, z)
quot(x, 0, s(z)) → s(quot(x, s(z), s(z)))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(5) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node.
(6) TRUE