Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

D(t) → s(h)
D(constant) → h
D(b(x, y)) → b(D(x), D(y))
D(c(x, y)) → b(c(y, D(x)), c(x, D(y)))
D(m(x, y)) → m(D(x), D(y))
D(opp(x)) → opp(D(x))
D(div(x, y)) → m(div(D(x), y), div(c(x, D(y)), pow(y, 2)))
D(ln(x)) → div(D(x), x)
D(pow(x, y)) → b(c(c(y, pow(x, m(y, 1))), D(x)), c(c(pow(x, y), ln(x)), D(y)))
b(h, x) → x
b(x, h) → x
b(s(x), s(y)) → s(s(b(x, y)))
b(b(x, y), z) → b(x, b(y, z))

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

D¹(b(x, y)) → B(D(x), D(y))
D¹(b(x, y)) → D¹(x)
D¹(b(x, y)) → D¹(y)
D¹(c(x, y)) → B(c(y, D(x)), c(x, D(y)))
D¹(c(x, y)) → D¹(x)
D¹(c(x, y)) → D¹(y)
D¹(m(x, y)) → D¹(x)
D¹(m(x, y)) → D¹(y)
D¹(opp(x)) → D¹(x)
D¹(div(x, y)) → D¹(x)
D¹(div(x, y)) → D¹(y)
D¹(ln(x)) → D¹(x)
D¹(pow(x, y)) → B(c(c(y, pow(x, m(y, 1))), D(x)), c(c(pow(x, y), ln(x)), D(y)))
D¹(pow(x, y)) → D¹(x)
D¹(pow(x, y)) → D¹(y)
B(s(x), s(y)) → B(x, y)
B(b(x, y), z) → B(x, b(y, z))
B(b(x, y), z) → B(y, z)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

D(t) → s(h)
D(constant) → h
D(b(x, y)) → b(D(x), D(y))
D(c(x, y)) → b(c(y, D(x)), c(x, D(y)))
D(m(x, y)) → m(D(x), D(y))
D(opp(x)) → opp(D(x))
D(div(x, y)) → m(div(D(x), y), div(c(x, D(y)), pow(y, 2)))
D(ln(x)) → div(D(x), x)
D(pow(x, y)) → b(c(c(y, pow(x, m(y, 1))), D(x)), c(c(pow(x, y), ln(x)), D(y)))
b(h, x) → x
b(x, h) → x
b(s(x), s(y)) → s(s(b(x, y)))
b(b(x, y), z) → b(x, b(y, z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 2 SCCs with 3 less nodes.

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

B(b(x, y), z) → B(x, b(y, z))
B(s(x), s(y)) → B(x, y)
B(b(x, y), z) → B(y, z)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

D(t) → s(h)
D(constant) → h
D(b(x, y)) → b(D(x), D(y))
D(c(x, y)) → b(c(y, D(x)), c(x, D(y)))
D(m(x, y)) → m(D(x), D(y))
D(opp(x)) → opp(D(x))
D(div(x, y)) → m(div(D(x), y), div(c(x, D(y)), pow(y, 2)))
D(ln(x)) → div(D(x), x)
D(pow(x, y)) → b(c(c(y, pow(x, m(y, 1))), D(x)), c(c(pow(x, y), ln(x)), D(y)))
b(h, x) → x
b(x, h) → x
b(s(x), s(y)) → s(s(b(x, y)))
b(b(x, y), z) → b(x, b(y, z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(6) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We used the following order and afs together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] to show that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

Order:Homeomorphic Embedding Order

AFS:
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
b(x1, x2)  =  b(x1, x2)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

• B(b(x, y), z) → B(x, b(y, z)) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1})
  The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

• B(s(x), s(y)) → B(x, y) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1, 2})
  The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2

• B(b(x, y), z) → B(y, z) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1, 2})
  The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2

We oriented the following set of usable rules [AAECC05,FROCOS05]. none

(7) TRUE

(8) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

D¹(b(x, y)) → D¹(y)
D¹(b(x, y)) → D¹(x)
D¹(c(x, y)) → D¹(x)
D¹(c(x, y)) → D¹(y)
D¹(m(x, y)) → D¹(x)
D¹(m(x, y)) → D¹(y)
D¹(opp(x)) → D¹(x)
D¹(div(x, y)) → D¹(x)
D¹(div(x, y)) → D¹(y)
D¹(ln(x)) → D¹(x)
D¹(pow(x, y)) → D¹(x)
D¹(pow(x, y)) → D¹(y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

D(t) → s(h)
D(constant) → h
D(b(x, y)) → b(D(x), D(y))
D(c(x, y)) → b(c(y, D(x)), c(x, D(y)))
D(m(x, y)) → m(D(x), D(y))
D(opp(x)) → opp(D(x))
D(div(x, y)) → m(div(D(x), y), div(c(x, D(y)), pow(y, 2)))
D(ln(x)) → div(D(x), x)
D(pow(x, y)) → b(c(c(y, pow(x, m(y, 1))), D(x)), c(c(pow(x, y), ln(x)), D(y)))
b(h, x) → x
b(x, h) → x
b(s(x), s(y)) → s(s(b(x, y)))
b(b(x, y), z) → b(x, b(y, z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(9) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We used the following order and afs together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] to show that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

Order:Homeomorphic Embedding Order

AFS:
ln(x1)  =  ln(x1)
opp(x1)  =  opp(x1)
b(x1, x2)  =  b(x1, x2)
c(x1, x2)  =  c(x1, x2)
div(x1, x2)  =  div(x1, x2)
m(x1, x2)  =  m(x1, x2)
pow(x1, x2)  =  pow(x1, x2)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

• D¹(b(x, y)) → D¹(y) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1})
  The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

• D¹(b(x, y)) → D¹(x) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1})
  The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

• D¹(c(x, y)) → D¹(x) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1})
  The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

• D¹(c(x, y)) → D¹(y) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1})
  The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

• D¹(m(x, y)) → D¹(x) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1})
  The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

• D¹(m(x, y)) → D¹(y) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1})
  The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

• D¹(opp(x)) → D¹(x) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1})
  The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

• D¹(div(x, y)) → D¹(x) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1})
  The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

• D¹(div(x, y)) → D¹(y) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1})
  The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

• D¹(ln(x)) → D¹(x) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1})
  The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

• D¹(pow(x, y)) → D¹(x) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1})
  The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

• D¹(pow(x, y)) → D¹(y) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1})
  The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

We oriented the following set of usable rules [AAECC05,FROCOS05]. none

(10) TRUE