Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmpdGf72H/secret1.xml

Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS

↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)

↳2 QDP

↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

↳4 AND

    ↳5 QDP

        ↳6 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳7 QDP

        ↳8 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳9 QDP

        ↳10 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

        ↳11 TRUE

    ↳12 QDP

        ↳13 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳14 QDP

        ↳15 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳16 QDP

        ↳17 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳18 QDP

        ↳19 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

        ↳20 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

D(t) → s(h)
D(constant) → h
D(b(x, y)) → b(D(x), D(y))
D(c(x, y)) → b(c(y, D(x)), c(x, D(y)))
D(m(x, y)) → m(D(x), D(y))
D(opp(x)) → opp(D(x))
D(div(x, y)) → m(div(D(x), y), div(c(x, D(y)), pow(y, 2)))
D(ln(x)) → div(D(x), x)
D(pow(x, y)) → b(c(c(y, pow(x, m(y, 1))), D(x)), c(c(pow(x, y), ln(x)), D(y)))
b(h, x) → x
b(x, h) → x
b(s(x), s(y)) → s(s(b(x, y)))
b(b(x, y), z) → b(x, b(y, z))

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

D¹(b(x, y)) → B(D(x), D(y))
D¹(b(x, y)) → D¹(x)
D¹(b(x, y)) → D¹(y)
D¹(c(x, y)) → B(c(y, D(x)), c(x, D(y)))
D¹(c(x, y)) → D¹(x)
D¹(c(x, y)) → D¹(y)
D¹(m(x, y)) → D¹(x)
D¹(m(x, y)) → D¹(y)
D¹(opp(x)) → D¹(x)
D¹(div(x, y)) → D¹(x)
D¹(div(x, y)) → D¹(y)
D¹(ln(x)) → D¹(x)
D¹(pow(x, y)) → B(c(c(y, pow(x, m(y, 1))), D(x)), c(c(pow(x, y), ln(x)), D(y)))
D¹(pow(x, y)) → D¹(x)
D¹(pow(x, y)) → D¹(y)
B(s(x), s(y)) → B(x, y)
B(b(x, y), z) → B(x, b(y, z))
B(b(x, y), z) → B(y, z)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

D(t) → s(h)
D(constant) → h
D(b(x, y)) → b(D(x), D(y))
D(c(x, y)) → b(c(y, D(x)), c(x, D(y)))
D(m(x, y)) → m(D(x), D(y))
D(opp(x)) → opp(D(x))
D(div(x, y)) → m(div(D(x), y), div(c(x, D(y)), pow(y, 2)))
D(ln(x)) → div(D(x), x)
D(pow(x, y)) → b(c(c(y, pow(x, m(y, 1))), D(x)), c(c(pow(x, y), ln(x)), D(y)))
b(h, x) → x
b(x, h) → x
b(s(x), s(y)) → s(s(b(x, y)))
b(b(x, y), z) → b(x, b(y, z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 2 SCCs with 3 less nodes.

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

B(b(x, y), z) → B(x, b(y, z))
B(s(x), s(y)) → B(x, y)
B(b(x, y), z) → B(y, z)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

D(t) → s(h)
D(constant) → h
D(b(x, y)) → b(D(x), D(y))
D(c(x, y)) → b(c(y, D(x)), c(x, D(y)))
D(m(x, y)) → m(D(x), D(y))
D(opp(x)) → opp(D(x))
D(div(x, y)) → m(div(D(x), y), div(c(x, D(y)), pow(y, 2)))
D(ln(x)) → div(D(x), x)
D(pow(x, y)) → b(c(c(y, pow(x, m(y, 1))), D(x)), c(c(pow(x, y), ln(x)), D(y)))
b(h, x) → x
b(x, h) → x
b(s(x), s(y)) → s(s(b(x, y)))
b(b(x, y), z) → b(x, b(y, z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

B(s(x), s(y)) → B(x, y)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
B(x0, x1, x2) = B(x0, x1)

Tags:
B has argument tags [3,0,1] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
B(x1, x2) = B
b(x1, x2) = b(x1, x2)
s(x1) = s(x1)
h = h

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[B, s₁] > b₂
h > b₂

Status:

B: []
b₂: [2,1]
s₁: [1]
h: []

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

B(b(x, y), z) → B(x, b(y, z))
B(b(x, y), z) → B(y, z)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

D(t) → s(h)
D(constant) → h
D(b(x, y)) → b(D(x), D(y))
D(c(x, y)) → b(c(y, D(x)), c(x, D(y)))
D(m(x, y)) → m(D(x), D(y))
D(opp(x)) → opp(D(x))
D(div(x, y)) → m(div(D(x), y), div(c(x, D(y)), pow(y, 2)))
D(ln(x)) → div(D(x), x)
D(pow(x, y)) → b(c(c(y, pow(x, m(y, 1))), D(x)), c(c(pow(x, y), ln(x)), D(y)))
b(h, x) → x
b(x, h) → x
b(s(x), s(y)) → s(s(b(x, y)))
b(b(x, y), z) → b(x, b(y, z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

B(b(x, y), z) → B(x, b(y, z))
B(b(x, y), z) → B(y, z)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
B(x0, x1, x2) = B(x0, x2)

Tags:
B has argument tags [0,2,3] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
B(x1, x2) = B(x1, x2)
b(x1, x2) = b(x1, x2)
h = h
s(x1) = x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

B₂ > b₂
h > b₂

Status:

B₂: [1,2]
b₂: [1,2]
h: []

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

b(h, x) → x
b(x, h) → x
b(s(x), s(y)) → s(s(b(x, y)))
b(b(x, y), z) → b(x, b(y, z))

(9) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

D(t) → s(h)
D(constant) → h
D(b(x, y)) → b(D(x), D(y))
D(c(x, y)) → b(c(y, D(x)), c(x, D(y)))
D(m(x, y)) → m(D(x), D(y))
D(opp(x)) → opp(D(x))
D(div(x, y)) → m(div(D(x), y), div(c(x, D(y)), pow(y, 2)))
D(ln(x)) → div(D(x), x)
D(pow(x, y)) → b(c(c(y, pow(x, m(y, 1))), D(x)), c(c(pow(x, y), ln(x)), D(y)))
b(h, x) → x
b(x, h) → x
b(s(x), s(y)) → s(s(b(x, y)))
b(b(x, y), z) → b(x, b(y, z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(10) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(11) TRUE

(12) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

D¹(b(x, y)) → D¹(y)
D¹(b(x, y)) → D¹(x)
D¹(c(x, y)) → D¹(x)
D¹(c(x, y)) → D¹(y)
D¹(m(x, y)) → D¹(x)
D¹(m(x, y)) → D¹(y)
D¹(opp(x)) → D¹(x)
D¹(div(x, y)) → D¹(x)
D¹(div(x, y)) → D¹(y)
D¹(ln(x)) → D¹(x)
D¹(pow(x, y)) → D¹(x)
D¹(pow(x, y)) → D¹(y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

D(t) → s(h)
D(constant) → h
D(b(x, y)) → b(D(x), D(y))
D(c(x, y)) → b(c(y, D(x)), c(x, D(y)))
D(m(x, y)) → m(D(x), D(y))
D(opp(x)) → opp(D(x))
D(div(x, y)) → m(div(D(x), y), div(c(x, D(y)), pow(y, 2)))
D(ln(x)) → div(D(x), x)
D(pow(x, y)) → b(c(c(y, pow(x, m(y, 1))), D(x)), c(c(pow(x, y), ln(x)), D(y)))
b(h, x) → x
b(x, h) → x
b(s(x), s(y)) → s(s(b(x, y)))
b(b(x, y), z) → b(x, b(y, z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(13) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

D¹(b(x, y)) → D¹(y)
D¹(b(x, y)) → D¹(x)
D¹(c(x, y)) → D¹(x)
D¹(c(x, y)) → D¹(y)
D¹(m(x, y)) → D¹(x)
D¹(m(x, y)) → D¹(y)
D¹(div(x, y)) → D¹(x)
D¹(div(x, y)) → D¹(y)
D¹(pow(x, y)) → D¹(x)
D¹(pow(x, y)) → D¹(y)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
D¹(x0, x1) = D¹(x1)

Tags:
D¹ has argument tags [0,1] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
D¹(x1) = x1
b(x1, x2) = b(x1, x2)
c(x1, x2) = c(x1, x2)
m(x1, x2) = m(x1, x2)
opp(x1) = x1
div(x1, x2) = div(x1, x2)
ln(x1) = x1
pow(x1, x2) = pow(x1, x2)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

b₂: [1,2]
c₂: [2,1]
m₂: [1,2]
div₂: [1,2]
pow₂: [2,1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(14) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

D¹(opp(x)) → D¹(x)
D¹(ln(x)) → D¹(x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

D(t) → s(h)
D(constant) → h
D(b(x, y)) → b(D(x), D(y))
D(c(x, y)) → b(c(y, D(x)), c(x, D(y)))
D(m(x, y)) → m(D(x), D(y))
D(opp(x)) → opp(D(x))
D(div(x, y)) → m(div(D(x), y), div(c(x, D(y)), pow(y, 2)))
D(ln(x)) → div(D(x), x)
D(pow(x, y)) → b(c(c(y, pow(x, m(y, 1))), D(x)), c(c(pow(x, y), ln(x)), D(y)))
b(h, x) → x
b(x, h) → x
b(s(x), s(y)) → s(s(b(x, y)))
b(b(x, y), z) → b(x, b(y, z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(15) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

D¹(opp(x)) → D¹(x)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
D¹(x0, x1) = D¹(x1)

Tags:
D¹ has argument tags [1,0] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
D¹(x1) = D¹
opp(x1) = opp(x1)
ln(x1) = x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

D^1: []
opp₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(16) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

D¹(ln(x)) → D¹(x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

D(t) → s(h)
D(constant) → h
D(b(x, y)) → b(D(x), D(y))
D(c(x, y)) → b(c(y, D(x)), c(x, D(y)))
D(m(x, y)) → m(D(x), D(y))
D(opp(x)) → opp(D(x))
D(div(x, y)) → m(div(D(x), y), div(c(x, D(y)), pow(y, 2)))
D(ln(x)) → div(D(x), x)
D(pow(x, y)) → b(c(c(y, pow(x, m(y, 1))), D(x)), c(c(pow(x, y), ln(x)), D(y)))
b(h, x) → x
b(x, h) → x
b(s(x), s(y)) → s(s(b(x, y)))
b(b(x, y), z) → b(x, b(y, z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(17) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

D¹(ln(x)) → D¹(x)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
D¹(x0, x1) = D¹(x1)

Tags:
D¹ has argument tags [1,1] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
D¹(x1) = D¹
ln(x1) = ln(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

D^1: []
ln₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(18) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

D(t) → s(h)
D(constant) → h
D(b(x, y)) → b(D(x), D(y))
D(c(x, y)) → b(c(y, D(x)), c(x, D(y)))
D(m(x, y)) → m(D(x), D(y))
D(opp(x)) → opp(D(x))
D(div(x, y)) → m(div(D(x), y), div(c(x, D(y)), pow(y, 2)))
D(ln(x)) → div(D(x), x)
D(pow(x, y)) → b(c(c(y, pow(x, m(y, 1))), D(x)), c(c(pow(x, y), ln(x)), D(y)))
b(h, x) → x
b(x, h) → x
b(s(x), s(y)) → s(s(b(x, y)))
b(b(x, y), z) → b(x, b(y, z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(19) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(0) Obligation:

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(2) Obligation:

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(7) Obligation:

(8) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(9) Obligation:

(10) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(11) TRUE

(12) Obligation:

(13) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(14) Obligation:

(15) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(16) Obligation:

(17) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(18) Obligation:

(19) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(20) TRUE