Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS
↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)
↳2 QDP
↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
↳4 AND
    ↳5 QDP
        ↳6 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳7 QDP
        ↳8 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳9 QDP
        ↳10 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
        ↳11 TRUE
    ↳12 QDP
        ↳13 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳14 QDP
        ↳15 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳16 QDP
        ↳17 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
        ↳18 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

D(t) → s(h)
D(constant) → h
D(b(x, y)) → b(D(x), D(y))
D(c(x, y)) → b(c(y, D(x)), c(x, D(y)))
D(m(x, y)) → m(D(x), D(y))
D(opp(x)) → opp(D(x))
D(div(x, y)) → m(div(D(x), y), div(c(x, D(y)), pow(y, 2)))
D(ln(x)) → div(D(x), x)
D(pow(x, y)) → b(c(c(y, pow(x, m(y, 1))), D(x)), c(c(pow(x, y), ln(x)), D(y)))
b(h, x) → x
b(x, h) → x
b(s(x), s(y)) → s(s(b(x, y)))
b(b(x, y), z) → b(x, b(y, z))

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

D1(b(x, y)) → B(D(x), D(y))
D1(b(x, y)) → D1(x)
D1(b(x, y)) → D1(y)
D1(c(x, y)) → B(c(y, D(x)), c(x, D(y)))
D1(c(x, y)) → D1(x)
D1(c(x, y)) → D1(y)
D1(m(x, y)) → D1(x)
D1(m(x, y)) → D1(y)
D1(opp(x)) → D1(x)
D1(div(x, y)) → D1(x)
D1(div(x, y)) → D1(y)
D1(ln(x)) → D1(x)
D1(pow(x, y)) → B(c(c(y, pow(x, m(y, 1))), D(x)), c(c(pow(x, y), ln(x)), D(y)))
D1(pow(x, y)) → D1(x)
D1(pow(x, y)) → D1(y)
B(s(x), s(y)) → B(x, y)
B(b(x, y), z) → B(x, b(y, z))
B(b(x, y), z) → B(y, z)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

D(t) → s(h)
D(constant) → h
D(b(x, y)) → b(D(x), D(y))
D(c(x, y)) → b(c(y, D(x)), c(x, D(y)))
D(m(x, y)) → m(D(x), D(y))
D(opp(x)) → opp(D(x))
D(div(x, y)) → m(div(D(x), y), div(c(x, D(y)), pow(y, 2)))
D(ln(x)) → div(D(x), x)
D(pow(x, y)) → b(c(c(y, pow(x, m(y, 1))), D(x)), c(c(pow(x, y), ln(x)), D(y)))
b(h, x) → x
b(x, h) → x
b(s(x), s(y)) → s(s(b(x, y)))
b(b(x, y), z) → b(x, b(y, z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 2 SCCs with 3 less nodes.

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

B(b(x, y), z) → B(x, b(y, z))
B(s(x), s(y)) → B(x, y)
B(b(x, y), z) → B(y, z)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

D(t) → s(h)
D(constant) → h
D(b(x, y)) → b(D(x), D(y))
D(c(x, y)) → b(c(y, D(x)), c(x, D(y)))
D(m(x, y)) → m(D(x), D(y))
D(opp(x)) → opp(D(x))
D(div(x, y)) → m(div(D(x), y), div(c(x, D(y)), pow(y, 2)))
D(ln(x)) → div(D(x), x)
D(pow(x, y)) → b(c(c(y, pow(x, m(y, 1))), D(x)), c(c(pow(x, y), ln(x)), D(y)))
b(h, x) → x
b(x, h) → x
b(s(x), s(y)) → s(s(b(x, y)))
b(b(x, y), z) → b(x, b(y, z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


B(b(x, y), z) → B(x, b(y, z))
B(b(x, y), z) → B(y, z)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
B(x0, x1, x2)  =  B(x1)

Tags:
B has argument tags [1,1,2] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
B(x1, x2)  =  x2
b(x1, x2)  =  b(x1, x2)
s(x1)  =  x1
h  =  h

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
h > b2

Status:
b2: [1,2]
h: []


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

b(h, x) → x
b(x, h) → x
b(s(x), s(y)) → s(s(b(x, y)))
b(b(x, y), z) → b(x, b(y, z))

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

B(s(x), s(y)) → B(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

D(t) → s(h)
D(constant) → h
D(b(x, y)) → b(D(x), D(y))
D(c(x, y)) → b(c(y, D(x)), c(x, D(y)))
D(m(x, y)) → m(D(x), D(y))
D(opp(x)) → opp(D(x))
D(div(x, y)) → m(div(D(x), y), div(c(x, D(y)), pow(y, 2)))
D(ln(x)) → div(D(x), x)
D(pow(x, y)) → b(c(c(y, pow(x, m(y, 1))), D(x)), c(c(pow(x, y), ln(x)), D(y)))
b(h, x) → x
b(x, h) → x
b(s(x), s(y)) → s(s(b(x, y)))
b(b(x, y), z) → b(x, b(y, z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


B(s(x), s(y)) → B(x, y)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
B(x0, x1, x2)  =  B(x0, x2)

Tags:
B has argument tags [1,0,0] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
B(x1, x2)  =  B
s(x1)  =  s(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[B, s1]

Status:
B: []
s1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(9) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

D(t) → s(h)
D(constant) → h
D(b(x, y)) → b(D(x), D(y))
D(c(x, y)) → b(c(y, D(x)), c(x, D(y)))
D(m(x, y)) → m(D(x), D(y))
D(opp(x)) → opp(D(x))
D(div(x, y)) → m(div(D(x), y), div(c(x, D(y)), pow(y, 2)))
D(ln(x)) → div(D(x), x)
D(pow(x, y)) → b(c(c(y, pow(x, m(y, 1))), D(x)), c(c(pow(x, y), ln(x)), D(y)))
b(h, x) → x
b(x, h) → x
b(s(x), s(y)) → s(s(b(x, y)))
b(b(x, y), z) → b(x, b(y, z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(10) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(11) TRUE

(12) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

D1(b(x, y)) → D1(y)
D1(b(x, y)) → D1(x)
D1(c(x, y)) → D1(x)
D1(c(x, y)) → D1(y)
D1(m(x, y)) → D1(x)
D1(m(x, y)) → D1(y)
D1(opp(x)) → D1(x)
D1(div(x, y)) → D1(x)
D1(div(x, y)) → D1(y)
D1(ln(x)) → D1(x)
D1(pow(x, y)) → D1(x)
D1(pow(x, y)) → D1(y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

D(t) → s(h)
D(constant) → h
D(b(x, y)) → b(D(x), D(y))
D(c(x, y)) → b(c(y, D(x)), c(x, D(y)))
D(m(x, y)) → m(D(x), D(y))
D(opp(x)) → opp(D(x))
D(div(x, y)) → m(div(D(x), y), div(c(x, D(y)), pow(y, 2)))
D(ln(x)) → div(D(x), x)
D(pow(x, y)) → b(c(c(y, pow(x, m(y, 1))), D(x)), c(c(pow(x, y), ln(x)), D(y)))
b(h, x) → x
b(x, h) → x
b(s(x), s(y)) → s(s(b(x, y)))
b(b(x, y), z) → b(x, b(y, z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(13) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


D1(b(x, y)) → D1(y)
D1(b(x, y)) → D1(x)
D1(c(x, y)) → D1(x)
D1(c(x, y)) → D1(y)
D1(m(x, y)) → D1(x)
D1(m(x, y)) → D1(y)
D1(div(x, y)) → D1(x)
D1(div(x, y)) → D1(y)
D1(ln(x)) → D1(x)
D1(pow(x, y)) → D1(x)
D1(pow(x, y)) → D1(y)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
D1(x0, x1)  =  D1(x0, x1)

Tags:
D1 has argument tags [1,0] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
D1(x1)  =  x1
b(x1, x2)  =  b(x1, x2)
c(x1, x2)  =  c(x1, x2)
m(x1, x2)  =  m(x1, x2)
opp(x1)  =  x1
div(x1, x2)  =  div(x1, x2)
ln(x1)  =  ln(x1)
pow(x1, x2)  =  pow(x1, x2)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
b2: [2,1]
c2: [1,2]
m2: [1,2]
div2: [1,2]
ln1: [1]
pow2: [1,2]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(14) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

D1(opp(x)) → D1(x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

D(t) → s(h)
D(constant) → h
D(b(x, y)) → b(D(x), D(y))
D(c(x, y)) → b(c(y, D(x)), c(x, D(y)))
D(m(x, y)) → m(D(x), D(y))
D(opp(x)) → opp(D(x))
D(div(x, y)) → m(div(D(x), y), div(c(x, D(y)), pow(y, 2)))
D(ln(x)) → div(D(x), x)
D(pow(x, y)) → b(c(c(y, pow(x, m(y, 1))), D(x)), c(c(pow(x, y), ln(x)), D(y)))
b(h, x) → x
b(x, h) → x
b(s(x), s(y)) → s(s(b(x, y)))
b(b(x, y), z) → b(x, b(y, z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(15) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


D1(opp(x)) → D1(x)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
D1(x0, x1)  =  D1(x0)

Tags:
D1 has argument tags [0,1] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
D1(x1)  =  x1
opp(x1)  =  opp(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
opp1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(16) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

D(t) → s(h)
D(constant) → h
D(b(x, y)) → b(D(x), D(y))
D(c(x, y)) → b(c(y, D(x)), c(x, D(y)))
D(m(x, y)) → m(D(x), D(y))
D(opp(x)) → opp(D(x))
D(div(x, y)) → m(div(D(x), y), div(c(x, D(y)), pow(y, 2)))
D(ln(x)) → div(D(x), x)
D(pow(x, y)) → b(c(c(y, pow(x, m(y, 1))), D(x)), c(c(pow(x, y), ln(x)), D(y)))
b(h, x) → x
b(x, h) → x
b(s(x), s(y)) → s(s(b(x, y)))
b(b(x, y), z) → b(x, b(y, z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(17) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(18) TRUE