(0) Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(a) → b
f(c) → d
f(g(x, y)) → g(f(x), f(y))
f(h(x, y)) → g(h(y, f(x)), h(x, f(y)))
g(x, x) → h(e, x)
Q is empty.
(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.
(2) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F(g(x, y)) → G(f(x), f(y))
F(g(x, y)) → F(x)
F(g(x, y)) → F(y)
F(h(x, y)) → G(h(y, f(x)), h(x, f(y)))
F(h(x, y)) → F(x)
F(h(x, y)) → F(y)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(a) → b
f(c) → d
f(g(x, y)) → g(f(x), f(y))
f(h(x, y)) → g(h(y, f(x)), h(x, f(y)))
g(x, x) → h(e, x)
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 2 less nodes.
(4) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F(g(x, y)) → F(y)
F(g(x, y)) → F(x)
F(h(x, y)) → F(x)
F(h(x, y)) → F(y)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(a) → b
f(c) → d
f(g(x, y)) → g(f(x), f(y))
f(h(x, y)) → g(h(y, f(x)), h(x, f(y)))
g(x, x) → h(e, x)
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].
The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
F(g(x, y)) → F(y)
F(g(x, y)) → F(x)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
F(
x0,
x1) =
F(
x0,
x1)
Tags:
F has argument tags [1,1] and root tag 0
Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:
POL(F(x1)) = 0
POL(g(x1, x2)) = 1 + x1 + x2
POL(h(x1, x2)) = x1 + x2
The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:
none
(6) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F(h(x, y)) → F(x)
F(h(x, y)) → F(y)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(a) → b
f(c) → d
f(g(x, y)) → g(f(x), f(y))
f(h(x, y)) → g(h(y, f(x)), h(x, f(y)))
g(x, x) → h(e, x)
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(7) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].
The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
F(h(x, y)) → F(x)
F(h(x, y)) → F(y)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
F(
x0,
x1) =
F(
x1)
Tags:
F has argument tags [1,0] and root tag 0
Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:
POL(F(x1)) = 0
POL(h(x1, x2)) = 1 + x1 + x2
The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:
none
(8) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(a) → b
f(c) → d
f(g(x, y)) → g(f(x), f(y))
f(h(x, y)) → g(h(y, f(x)), h(x, f(y)))
g(x, x) → h(e, x)
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(9) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.
(10) TRUE