(0) Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(a) → g(h(a))
h(g(x)) → g(h(f(x)))
k(x, h(x), a) → h(x)
k(f(x), y, x) → f(x)
Q is empty.
(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.
(2) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F(a) → H(a)
H(g(x)) → H(f(x))
H(g(x)) → F(x)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(a) → g(h(a))
h(g(x)) → g(h(f(x)))
k(x, h(x), a) → h(x)
k(f(x), y, x) → f(x)
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 2 less nodes.
(4) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
H(g(x)) → H(f(x))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(a) → g(h(a))
h(g(x)) → g(h(f(x)))
k(x, h(x), a) → h(x)
k(f(x), y, x) → f(x)
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(5) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We used the following order and afs together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] to show that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.
Order:Combined order from the following AFS and order.
f(x1) = x1
a = a
g(x1) = g(x1)
h(x1) = h
Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
a > g1
a > h
Status:
a: []
g1: [1]
h: []
AFS:
f(x1) = x1
a = a
g(x1) = g(x1)
h(x1) = h
From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- H(g(x)) → H(f(x)) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1})
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
We oriented the following set of usable rules [AAECC05,FROCOS05].
f(a) → g(h(a))
(6) TRUE