(0) Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
rev(nil) → nil
rev(rev(x)) → x
rev(++(x, y)) → ++(rev(y), rev(x))
++(nil, y) → y
++(x, nil) → x
++(.(x, y), z) → .(x, ++(y, z))
++(x, ++(y, z)) → ++(++(x, y), z)
make(x) → .(x, nil)
Q is empty.
(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.
(2) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
REV(++(x, y)) → ++1(rev(y), rev(x))
REV(++(x, y)) → REV(y)
REV(++(x, y)) → REV(x)
++1(.(x, y), z) → ++1(y, z)
++1(x, ++(y, z)) → ++1(++(x, y), z)
++1(x, ++(y, z)) → ++1(x, y)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
rev(nil) → nil
rev(rev(x)) → x
rev(++(x, y)) → ++(rev(y), rev(x))
++(nil, y) → y
++(x, nil) → x
++(.(x, y), z) → .(x, ++(y, z))
++(x, ++(y, z)) → ++(++(x, y), z)
make(x) → .(x, nil)
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 2 SCCs with 1 less node.
(4) Complex Obligation (AND)
(5) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
++1(x, ++(y, z)) → ++1(++(x, y), z)
++1(.(x, y), z) → ++1(y, z)
++1(x, ++(y, z)) → ++1(x, y)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
rev(nil) → nil
rev(rev(x)) → x
rev(++(x, y)) → ++(rev(y), rev(x))
++(nil, y) → y
++(x, nil) → x
++(.(x, y), z) → .(x, ++(y, z))
++(x, ++(y, z)) → ++(++(x, y), z)
make(x) → .(x, nil)
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].
The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
++1(x, ++(y, z)) → ++1(++(x, y), z)
++1(x, ++(y, z)) → ++1(x, y)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
++1(
x0,
x1,
x2) =
++1(
x0,
x2)
Tags:
++1 has argument tags [3,3,0] and root tag 0
Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
++1(
x1,
x2) =
++1
++(
x1,
x2) =
++(
x1,
x2)
.(
x1,
x2) =
x2
nil =
nil
Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
++2 > ++^1
Status:
++^1: []
++2: [1,2]
nil: []
The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:
none
(7) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
++1(.(x, y), z) → ++1(y, z)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
rev(nil) → nil
rev(rev(x)) → x
rev(++(x, y)) → ++(rev(y), rev(x))
++(nil, y) → y
++(x, nil) → x
++(.(x, y), z) → .(x, ++(y, z))
++(x, ++(y, z)) → ++(++(x, y), z)
make(x) → .(x, nil)
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(8) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].
The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
++1(.(x, y), z) → ++1(y, z)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
++1(
x0,
x1,
x2) =
++1(
x1)
Tags:
++1 has argument tags [0,3,0] and root tag 0
Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
++1(
x1,
x2) =
++1
.(
x1,
x2) =
.(
x1,
x2)
Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[++^1, .2]
Status:
++^1: []
.2: [2,1]
The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:
none
(9) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
rev(nil) → nil
rev(rev(x)) → x
rev(++(x, y)) → ++(rev(y), rev(x))
++(nil, y) → y
++(x, nil) → x
++(.(x, y), z) → .(x, ++(y, z))
++(x, ++(y, z)) → ++(++(x, y), z)
make(x) → .(x, nil)
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(10) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.
(11) TRUE
(12) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
REV(++(x, y)) → REV(x)
REV(++(x, y)) → REV(y)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
rev(nil) → nil
rev(rev(x)) → x
rev(++(x, y)) → ++(rev(y), rev(x))
++(nil, y) → y
++(x, nil) → x
++(.(x, y), z) → .(x, ++(y, z))
++(x, ++(y, z)) → ++(++(x, y), z)
make(x) → .(x, nil)
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(13) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].
The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
REV(++(x, y)) → REV(x)
REV(++(x, y)) → REV(y)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
REV(
x0,
x1) =
REV(
x0)
Tags:
REV has argument tags [0,1] and root tag 0
Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
REV(
x1) =
x1
++(
x1,
x2) =
++(
x1,
x2)
Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial
Status:
++2: [2,1]
The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:
none
(14) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
rev(nil) → nil
rev(rev(x)) → x
rev(++(x, y)) → ++(rev(y), rev(x))
++(nil, y) → y
++(x, nil) → x
++(.(x, y), z) → .(x, ++(y, z))
++(x, ++(y, z)) → ++(++(x, y), z)
make(x) → .(x, nil)
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(15) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.
(16) TRUE