Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS
↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)
↳2 QDP
↳3 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
↳4 QDP
↳5 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
↳6 AND
    ↳7 QDP
        ↳8 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳9 QDP
        ↳10 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
        ↳11 TRUE
    ↳12 QDP
        ↳13 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳14 QDP
        ↳15 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
        ↳16 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

*(x, *(y, z)) → *(otimes(x, y), z)
*(1, y) → y
*(+(x, y), z) → oplus(*(x, z), *(y, z))
*(x, oplus(y, z)) → oplus(*(x, y), *(x, z))

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

*1(x, *(y, z)) → *1(otimes(x, y), z)
*1(+(x, y), z) → *1(x, z)
*1(+(x, y), z) → *1(y, z)
*1(x, oplus(y, z)) → *1(x, y)
*1(x, oplus(y, z)) → *1(x, z)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

*(x, *(y, z)) → *(otimes(x, y), z)
*(1, y) → y
*(+(x, y), z) → oplus(*(x, z), *(y, z))
*(x, oplus(y, z)) → oplus(*(x, y), *(x, z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


*1(x, oplus(y, z)) → *1(x, y)
*1(x, oplus(y, z)) → *1(x, z)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
*1(x1, x2)  =  *1(x2)

Tags:
*1 has tags [0,1]

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
*(x1, x2)  =  x2
otimes(x1, x2)  =  otimes
+(x1, x2)  =  x2
oplus(x1, x2)  =  oplus(x1, x2)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
otimes: multiset
oplus2: multiset


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(4) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

*1(x, *(y, z)) → *1(otimes(x, y), z)
*1(+(x, y), z) → *1(x, z)
*1(+(x, y), z) → *1(y, z)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

*(x, *(y, z)) → *(otimes(x, y), z)
*(1, y) → y
*(+(x, y), z) → oplus(*(x, z), *(y, z))
*(x, oplus(y, z)) → oplus(*(x, y), *(x, z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(5) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 2 SCCs.

(6) Complex Obligation (AND)

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

*1(x, *(y, z)) → *1(otimes(x, y), z)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

*(x, *(y, z)) → *(otimes(x, y), z)
*(1, y) → y
*(+(x, y), z) → oplus(*(x, z), *(y, z))
*(x, oplus(y, z)) → oplus(*(x, y), *(x, z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


*1(x, *(y, z)) → *1(otimes(x, y), z)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
*1(x1, x2)  =  *1(x1, x2)

Tags:
*1 has tags [0,1]

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
*(x1, x2)  =  *(x1, x2)
otimes(x1, x2)  =  otimes(x2)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[*2, otimes1]

Status:
*2: multiset
otimes1: multiset


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(9) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

*(x, *(y, z)) → *(otimes(x, y), z)
*(1, y) → y
*(+(x, y), z) → oplus(*(x, z), *(y, z))
*(x, oplus(y, z)) → oplus(*(x, y), *(x, z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(10) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(11) TRUE

(12) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

*1(+(x, y), z) → *1(y, z)
*1(+(x, y), z) → *1(x, z)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

*(x, *(y, z)) → *(otimes(x, y), z)
*(1, y) → y
*(+(x, y), z) → oplus(*(x, z), *(y, z))
*(x, oplus(y, z)) → oplus(*(x, y), *(x, z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(13) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


*1(+(x, y), z) → *1(y, z)
*1(+(x, y), z) → *1(x, z)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
*1(x1, x2)  =  *1(x1)

Tags:
*1 has tags [1,0]

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
+2: multiset


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(14) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

*(x, *(y, z)) → *(otimes(x, y), z)
*(1, y) → y
*(+(x, y), z) → oplus(*(x, z), *(y, z))
*(x, oplus(y, z)) → oplus(*(x, y), *(x, z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(15) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(16) TRUE