Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

norm(nil) → 0
norm(g(x, y)) → s(norm(x))
f(x, nil) → g(nil, x)
f(x, g(y, z)) → g(f(x, y), z)
rem(nil, y) → nil
rem(g(x, y), 0) → g(x, y)
rem(g(x, y), s(z)) → rem(x, z)

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

NORM(g(x, y)) → NORM(x)
F(x, g(y, z)) → F(x, y)
REM(g(x, y), s(z)) → REM(x, z)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

norm(nil) → 0
norm(g(x, y)) → s(norm(x))
f(x, nil) → g(nil, x)
f(x, g(y, z)) → g(f(x, y), z)
rem(nil, y) → nil
rem(g(x, y), 0) → g(x, y)
rem(g(x, y), s(z)) → rem(x, z)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 3 SCCs.

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

REM(g(x, y), s(z)) → REM(x, z)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

norm(nil) → 0
norm(g(x, y)) → s(norm(x))
f(x, nil) → g(nil, x)
f(x, g(y, z)) → g(f(x, y), z)
rem(nil, y) → nil
rem(g(x, y), 0) → g(x, y)
rem(g(x, y), s(z)) → rem(x, z)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

REM(g(x, y), s(z)) → REM(x, z)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
REM(x0, x1, x2)  =  REM(x0)

Tags:
REM has argument tags [0,1,3] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
REM(x1, x2)  =  REM(x1, x2)
g(x1, x2)  =  x1
s(x1)  =  s(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

s₁ > REM₂

Status:

REM₂: [2,1]
s₁: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

norm(nil) → 0
norm(g(x, y)) → s(norm(x))
f(x, nil) → g(nil, x)
f(x, g(y, z)) → g(f(x, y), z)
rem(nil, y) → nil
rem(g(x, y), 0) → g(x, y)
rem(g(x, y), s(z)) → rem(x, z)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(9) TRUE

(10) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

F(x, g(y, z)) → F(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

norm(nil) → 0
norm(g(x, y)) → s(norm(x))
f(x, nil) → g(nil, x)
f(x, g(y, z)) → g(f(x, y), z)
rem(nil, y) → nil
rem(g(x, y), 0) → g(x, y)
rem(g(x, y), s(z)) → rem(x, z)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(11) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

F(x, g(y, z)) → F(x, y)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
F(x0, x1, x2)  =  F(x0, x2)

Tags:
F has argument tags [2,1,1] and root tag 0

Comparison: MIN
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
F(x1, x2)  =  F(x2)
g(x1, x2)  =  g(x1, x2)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[F₁, g₂]

Status:

F₁: multiset
g₂: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(12) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

norm(nil) → 0
norm(g(x, y)) → s(norm(x))
f(x, nil) → g(nil, x)
f(x, g(y, z)) → g(f(x, y), z)
rem(nil, y) → nil
rem(g(x, y), 0) → g(x, y)
rem(g(x, y), s(z)) → rem(x, z)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(13) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(14) TRUE

(15) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

NORM(g(x, y)) → NORM(x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

norm(nil) → 0
norm(g(x, y)) → s(norm(x))
f(x, nil) → g(nil, x)
f(x, g(y, z)) → g(f(x, y), z)
rem(nil, y) → nil
rem(g(x, y), 0) → g(x, y)
rem(g(x, y), s(z)) → rem(x, z)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(16) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

NORM(g(x, y)) → NORM(x)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
NORM(x0, x1)  =  NORM(x0, x1)

Tags:
NORM has argument tags [1,1] and root tag 0

Comparison: MS
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
NORM(x1)  =  NORM
g(x1, x2)  =  g(x1, x2)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[NORM, g₂]

Status:

NORM: []
g₂: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(17) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

norm(nil) → 0
norm(g(x, y)) → s(norm(x))
f(x, nil) → g(nil, x)
f(x, g(y, z)) → g(f(x, y), z)
rem(nil, y) → nil
rem(g(x, y), 0) → g(x, y)
rem(g(x, y), s(z)) → rem(x, z)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(18) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(19) TRUE