(0) Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
fib(0) → 0
fib(s(0)) → s(0)
fib(s(s(x))) → +(fib(s(x)), fib(x))
+(x, 0) → x
+(x, s(y)) → s(+(x, y))
Q is empty.
(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.
(2) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
FIB(s(s(x))) → +1(fib(s(x)), fib(x))
FIB(s(s(x))) → FIB(s(x))
FIB(s(s(x))) → FIB(x)
+1(x, s(y)) → +1(x, y)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
fib(0) → 0
fib(s(0)) → s(0)
fib(s(s(x))) → +(fib(s(x)), fib(x))
+(x, 0) → x
+(x, s(y)) → s(+(x, y))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 2 SCCs with 1 less node.
(4) Complex Obligation (AND)
(5) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
+1(x, s(y)) → +1(x, y)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
fib(0) → 0
fib(s(0)) → s(0)
fib(s(s(x))) → +(fib(s(x)), fib(x))
+(x, 0) → x
+(x, s(y)) → s(+(x, y))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].
The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
+1(x, s(y)) → +1(x, y)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
+1(
x0,
x1,
x2) =
+1(
x2)
Tags:
+1 has argument tags [0,0,1] and root tag 0
Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
+1(
x1,
x2) =
x1
s(
x1) =
s(
x1)
Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial
Status:
s1: [1]
The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:
none
(7) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
fib(0) → 0
fib(s(0)) → s(0)
fib(s(s(x))) → +(fib(s(x)), fib(x))
+(x, 0) → x
+(x, s(y)) → s(+(x, y))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(8) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.
(9) TRUE
(10) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
FIB(s(s(x))) → FIB(x)
FIB(s(s(x))) → FIB(s(x))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
fib(0) → 0
fib(s(0)) → s(0)
fib(s(s(x))) → +(fib(s(x)), fib(x))
+(x, 0) → x
+(x, s(y)) → s(+(x, y))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(11) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].
The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
FIB(s(s(x))) → FIB(x)
FIB(s(s(x))) → FIB(s(x))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
FIB(
x0,
x1) =
FIB(
x0,
x1)
Tags:
FIB has argument tags [1,1] and root tag 0
Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
FIB(
x1) =
FIB
s(
x1) =
s(
x1)
Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[FIB, s1]
Status:
FIB: multiset
s1: multiset
The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:
none
(12) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
fib(0) → 0
fib(s(0)) → s(0)
fib(s(s(x))) → +(fib(s(x)), fib(x))
+(x, 0) → x
+(x, s(y)) → s(+(x, y))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(13) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.
(14) TRUE