(0) Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
exp(x, 0) → s(0)
exp(x, s(y)) → *(x, exp(x, y))
*(0, y) → 0
*(s(x), y) → +(y, *(x, y))
-(0, y) → 0
-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
Q is empty.
(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.
(2) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
EXP(x, s(y)) → *1(x, exp(x, y))
EXP(x, s(y)) → EXP(x, y)
*1(s(x), y) → *1(x, y)
-1(s(x), s(y)) → -1(x, y)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
exp(x, 0) → s(0)
exp(x, s(y)) → *(x, exp(x, y))
*(0, y) → 0
*(s(x), y) → +(y, *(x, y))
-(0, y) → 0
-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 3 SCCs with 1 less node.
(4) Complex Obligation (AND)
(5) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
-1(s(x), s(y)) → -1(x, y)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
exp(x, 0) → s(0)
exp(x, s(y)) → *(x, exp(x, y))
*(0, y) → 0
*(s(x), y) → +(y, *(x, y))
-(0, y) → 0
-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(6) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We used the following order and afs together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] to show that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.
Order:Homeomorphic Embedding Order
AFS:
s(x1) = s(x1)
From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- -1(s(x), s(y)) → -1(x, y) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1, 2})
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2
We oriented the following set of usable rules [AAECC05,FROCOS05].
none
(7) TRUE
(8) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
*1(s(x), y) → *1(x, y)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
exp(x, 0) → s(0)
exp(x, s(y)) → *(x, exp(x, y))
*(0, y) → 0
*(s(x), y) → +(y, *(x, y))
-(0, y) → 0
-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(9) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We used the following order and afs together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] to show that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.
Order:Homeomorphic Embedding Order
AFS:
s(x1) = s(x1)
From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- *1(s(x), y) → *1(x, y) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1, 2})
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
We oriented the following set of usable rules [AAECC05,FROCOS05].
none
(10) TRUE
(11) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
EXP(x, s(y)) → EXP(x, y)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
exp(x, 0) → s(0)
exp(x, s(y)) → *(x, exp(x, y))
*(0, y) → 0
*(s(x), y) → +(y, *(x, y))
-(0, y) → 0
-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(12) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We used the following order and afs together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] to show that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.
Order:Homeomorphic Embedding Order
AFS:
s(x1) = s(x1)
From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- EXP(x, s(y)) → EXP(x, y) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1, 2})
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2
We oriented the following set of usable rules [AAECC05,FROCOS05].
none
(13) TRUE