Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmp5bDGI3/wst99.xml

Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS

↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)

↳2 QDP

↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

↳4 QDP

↳5 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

↳6 QDP

↳7 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

↳8 QDP

↳9 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

↳10 QDP

↳11 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

↳12 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

din(der(plus(X, Y))) → u21(din(der(X)), X, Y)
u21(dout(DX), X, Y) → u22(din(der(Y)), X, Y, DX)
u22(dout(DY), X, Y, DX) → dout(plus(DX, DY))
din(der(times(X, Y))) → u31(din(der(X)), X, Y)
u31(dout(DX), X, Y) → u32(din(der(Y)), X, Y, DX)
u32(dout(DY), X, Y, DX) → dout(plus(times(X, DY), times(Y, DX)))
din(der(der(X))) → u41(din(der(X)), X)
u41(dout(DX), X) → u42(din(der(DX)), X, DX)
u42(dout(DDX), X, DX) → dout(DDX)

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

DIN(der(plus(X, Y))) → U21(din(der(X)), X, Y)
DIN(der(plus(X, Y))) → DIN(der(X))
U21(dout(DX), X, Y) → U22(din(der(Y)), X, Y, DX)
U21(dout(DX), X, Y) → DIN(der(Y))
DIN(der(times(X, Y))) → U31(din(der(X)), X, Y)
DIN(der(times(X, Y))) → DIN(der(X))
U31(dout(DX), X, Y) → U32(din(der(Y)), X, Y, DX)
U31(dout(DX), X, Y) → DIN(der(Y))
DIN(der(der(X))) → U41(din(der(X)), X)
DIN(der(der(X))) → DIN(der(X))
U41(dout(DX), X) → U42(din(der(DX)), X, DX)
U41(dout(DX), X) → DIN(der(DX))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

din(der(plus(X, Y))) → u21(din(der(X)), X, Y)
u21(dout(DX), X, Y) → u22(din(der(Y)), X, Y, DX)
u22(dout(DY), X, Y, DX) → dout(plus(DX, DY))
din(der(times(X, Y))) → u31(din(der(X)), X, Y)
u31(dout(DX), X, Y) → u32(din(der(Y)), X, Y, DX)
u32(dout(DY), X, Y, DX) → dout(plus(times(X, DY), times(Y, DX)))
din(der(der(X))) → u41(din(der(X)), X)
u41(dout(DX), X) → u42(din(der(DX)), X, DX)
u42(dout(DDX), X, DX) → dout(DDX)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 3 less nodes.

(4) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U21(dout(DX), X, Y) → DIN(der(Y))
DIN(der(plus(X, Y))) → U21(din(der(X)), X, Y)
DIN(der(plus(X, Y))) → DIN(der(X))
DIN(der(times(X, Y))) → U31(din(der(X)), X, Y)
U31(dout(DX), X, Y) → DIN(der(Y))
DIN(der(times(X, Y))) → DIN(der(X))
DIN(der(der(X))) → U41(din(der(X)), X)
U41(dout(DX), X) → DIN(der(DX))
DIN(der(der(X))) → DIN(der(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

din(der(plus(X, Y))) → u21(din(der(X)), X, Y)
u21(dout(DX), X, Y) → u22(din(der(Y)), X, Y, DX)
u22(dout(DY), X, Y, DX) → dout(plus(DX, DY))
din(der(times(X, Y))) → u31(din(der(X)), X, Y)
u31(dout(DX), X, Y) → u32(din(der(Y)), X, Y, DX)
u32(dout(DY), X, Y, DX) → dout(plus(times(X, DY), times(Y, DX)))
din(der(der(X))) → u41(din(der(X)), X)
u41(dout(DX), X) → u42(din(der(DX)), X, DX)
u42(dout(DDX), X, DX) → dout(DDX)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

U21(dout(DX), X, Y) → DIN(der(Y))
U31(dout(DX), X, Y) → DIN(der(Y))
U41(dout(DX), X) → DIN(der(DX))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(DIN(x₁)) = x₁
POL(U21(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 1 + x₁
POL(U31(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 1 + x₁
POL(U41(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁
POL(der(x₁)) = 1
POL(din(x₁)) = 0
POL(dout(x₁)) = 1
POL(plus(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(times(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(u21(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = x₁
POL(u22(x₁, x₂, x₃, x₄)) = 1 + x₁
POL(u31(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = x₁
POL(u32(x₁, x₂, x₃, x₄)) = 1 + x₁
POL(u41(x₁, x₂)) = x₁
POL(u42(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 1 + x₁

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

din(der(plus(X, Y))) → u21(din(der(X)), X, Y)
din(der(times(X, Y))) → u31(din(der(X)), X, Y)
din(der(der(X))) → u41(din(der(X)), X)
u31(dout(DX), X, Y) → u32(din(der(Y)), X, Y, DX)
u21(dout(DX), X, Y) → u22(din(der(Y)), X, Y, DX)
u41(dout(DX), X) → u42(din(der(DX)), X, DX)
u42(dout(DDX), X, DX) → dout(DDX)
u22(dout(DY), X, Y, DX) → dout(plus(DX, DY))
u32(dout(DY), X, Y, DX) → dout(plus(times(X, DY), times(Y, DX)))

(6) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

DIN(der(plus(X, Y))) → U21(din(der(X)), X, Y)
DIN(der(plus(X, Y))) → DIN(der(X))
DIN(der(times(X, Y))) → U31(din(der(X)), X, Y)
DIN(der(times(X, Y))) → DIN(der(X))
DIN(der(der(X))) → U41(din(der(X)), X)
DIN(der(der(X))) → DIN(der(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

din(der(plus(X, Y))) → u21(din(der(X)), X, Y)
u21(dout(DX), X, Y) → u22(din(der(Y)), X, Y, DX)
u22(dout(DY), X, Y, DX) → dout(plus(DX, DY))
din(der(times(X, Y))) → u31(din(der(X)), X, Y)
u31(dout(DX), X, Y) → u32(din(der(Y)), X, Y, DX)
u32(dout(DY), X, Y, DX) → dout(plus(times(X, DY), times(Y, DX)))
din(der(der(X))) → u41(din(der(X)), X)
u41(dout(DX), X) → u42(din(der(DX)), X, DX)
u42(dout(DDX), X, DX) → dout(DDX)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(7) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 3 less nodes.

(8) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

DIN(der(times(X, Y))) → DIN(der(X))
DIN(der(plus(X, Y))) → DIN(der(X))
DIN(der(der(X))) → DIN(der(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

din(der(plus(X, Y))) → u21(din(der(X)), X, Y)
u21(dout(DX), X, Y) → u22(din(der(Y)), X, Y, DX)
u22(dout(DY), X, Y, DX) → dout(plus(DX, DY))
din(der(times(X, Y))) → u31(din(der(X)), X, Y)
u31(dout(DX), X, Y) → u32(din(der(Y)), X, Y, DX)
u32(dout(DY), X, Y, DX) → dout(plus(times(X, DY), times(Y, DX)))
din(der(der(X))) → u41(din(der(X)), X)
u41(dout(DX), X) → u42(din(der(DX)), X, DX)
u42(dout(DDX), X, DX) → dout(DDX)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(9) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

DIN(der(times(X, Y))) → DIN(der(X))
DIN(der(plus(X, Y))) → DIN(der(X))
DIN(der(der(X))) → DIN(der(X))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(DIN(x₁)) = x₁
POL(der(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(plus(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁
POL(times(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(10) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

din(der(plus(X, Y))) → u21(din(der(X)), X, Y)
u21(dout(DX), X, Y) → u22(din(der(Y)), X, Y, DX)
u22(dout(DY), X, Y, DX) → dout(plus(DX, DY))
din(der(times(X, Y))) → u31(din(der(X)), X, Y)
u31(dout(DX), X, Y) → u32(din(der(Y)), X, Y, DX)
u32(dout(DY), X, Y, DX) → dout(plus(times(X, DY), times(Y, DX)))
din(der(der(X))) → u41(din(der(X)), X)
u41(dout(DX), X) → u42(din(der(DX)), X, DX)
u42(dout(DDX), X, DX) → dout(DDX)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(11) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(0) Obligation:

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(2) Obligation:

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(4) Obligation:

(5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(6) Obligation:

(7) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(8) Obligation:

(9) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(10) Obligation:

(11) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(12) TRUE