Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS
↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)
↳2 QDP
↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
↳4 AND
    ↳5 QDP
        ↳6 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳7 QDP
        ↳8 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
        ↳9 TRUE
    ↳10 QDP
        ↳11 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳12 QDP
        ↳13 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
        ↳14 TRUE
    ↳15 QDP
        ↳16 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳17 QDP
        ↳18 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
        ↳19 TRUE
    ↳20 QDP
        ↳21 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳22 QDP
        ↳23 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
        ↳24 TRUE
    ↳25 QDP
        ↳26 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳27 QDP
        ↳28 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
        ↳29 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(Y)) → false
eq(s(X), 0) → false
eq(s(X), s(Y)) → eq(X, Y)
le(0, Y) → true
le(s(X), 0) → false
le(s(X), s(Y)) → le(X, Y)
min(cons(0, nil)) → 0
min(cons(s(N), nil)) → s(N)
min(cons(N, cons(M, L))) → ifmin(le(N, M), cons(N, cons(M, L)))
ifmin(true, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(N, L))
ifmin(false, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(M, L))
replace(N, M, nil) → nil
replace(N, M, cons(K, L)) → ifrepl(eq(N, K), N, M, cons(K, L))
ifrepl(true, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(M, L)
ifrepl(false, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(K, replace(N, M, L))
selsort(nil) → nil
selsort(cons(N, L)) → ifselsort(eq(N, min(cons(N, L))), cons(N, L))
ifselsort(true, cons(N, L)) → cons(N, selsort(L))
ifselsort(false, cons(N, L)) → cons(min(cons(N, L)), selsort(replace(min(cons(N, L)), N, L)))

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EQ(s(X), s(Y)) → EQ(X, Y)
LE(s(X), s(Y)) → LE(X, Y)
MIN(cons(N, cons(M, L))) → IFMIN(le(N, M), cons(N, cons(M, L)))
MIN(cons(N, cons(M, L))) → LE(N, M)
IFMIN(true, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → MIN(cons(N, L))
IFMIN(false, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → MIN(cons(M, L))
REPLACE(N, M, cons(K, L)) → IFREPL(eq(N, K), N, M, cons(K, L))
REPLACE(N, M, cons(K, L)) → EQ(N, K)
IFREPL(false, N, M, cons(K, L)) → REPLACE(N, M, L)
SELSORT(cons(N, L)) → IFSELSORT(eq(N, min(cons(N, L))), cons(N, L))
SELSORT(cons(N, L)) → EQ(N, min(cons(N, L)))
SELSORT(cons(N, L)) → MIN(cons(N, L))
IFSELSORT(true, cons(N, L)) → SELSORT(L)
IFSELSORT(false, cons(N, L)) → MIN(cons(N, L))
IFSELSORT(false, cons(N, L)) → SELSORT(replace(min(cons(N, L)), N, L))
IFSELSORT(false, cons(N, L)) → REPLACE(min(cons(N, L)), N, L)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(Y)) → false
eq(s(X), 0) → false
eq(s(X), s(Y)) → eq(X, Y)
le(0, Y) → true
le(s(X), 0) → false
le(s(X), s(Y)) → le(X, Y)
min(cons(0, nil)) → 0
min(cons(s(N), nil)) → s(N)
min(cons(N, cons(M, L))) → ifmin(le(N, M), cons(N, cons(M, L)))
ifmin(true, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(N, L))
ifmin(false, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(M, L))
replace(N, M, nil) → nil
replace(N, M, cons(K, L)) → ifrepl(eq(N, K), N, M, cons(K, L))
ifrepl(true, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(M, L)
ifrepl(false, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(K, replace(N, M, L))
selsort(nil) → nil
selsort(cons(N, L)) → ifselsort(eq(N, min(cons(N, L))), cons(N, L))
ifselsort(true, cons(N, L)) → cons(N, selsort(L))
ifselsort(false, cons(N, L)) → cons(min(cons(N, L)), selsort(replace(min(cons(N, L)), N, L)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 5 SCCs with 6 less nodes.

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LE(s(X), s(Y)) → LE(X, Y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(Y)) → false
eq(s(X), 0) → false
eq(s(X), s(Y)) → eq(X, Y)
le(0, Y) → true
le(s(X), 0) → false
le(s(X), s(Y)) → le(X, Y)
min(cons(0, nil)) → 0
min(cons(s(N), nil)) → s(N)
min(cons(N, cons(M, L))) → ifmin(le(N, M), cons(N, cons(M, L)))
ifmin(true, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(N, L))
ifmin(false, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(M, L))
replace(N, M, nil) → nil
replace(N, M, cons(K, L)) → ifrepl(eq(N, K), N, M, cons(K, L))
ifrepl(true, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(M, L)
ifrepl(false, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(K, replace(N, M, L))
selsort(nil) → nil
selsort(cons(N, L)) → ifselsort(eq(N, min(cons(N, L))), cons(N, L))
ifselsort(true, cons(N, L)) → cons(N, selsort(L))
ifselsort(false, cons(N, L)) → cons(min(cons(N, L)), selsort(replace(min(cons(N, L)), N, L)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


LE(s(X), s(Y)) → LE(X, Y)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[LE2, s1]

Status:
LE2: [1,2]
s1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(Y)) → false
eq(s(X), 0) → false
eq(s(X), s(Y)) → eq(X, Y)
le(0, Y) → true
le(s(X), 0) → false
le(s(X), s(Y)) → le(X, Y)
min(cons(0, nil)) → 0
min(cons(s(N), nil)) → s(N)
min(cons(N, cons(M, L))) → ifmin(le(N, M), cons(N, cons(M, L)))
ifmin(true, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(N, L))
ifmin(false, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(M, L))
replace(N, M, nil) → nil
replace(N, M, cons(K, L)) → ifrepl(eq(N, K), N, M, cons(K, L))
ifrepl(true, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(M, L)
ifrepl(false, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(K, replace(N, M, L))
selsort(nil) → nil
selsort(cons(N, L)) → ifselsort(eq(N, min(cons(N, L))), cons(N, L))
ifselsort(true, cons(N, L)) → cons(N, selsort(L))
ifselsort(false, cons(N, L)) → cons(min(cons(N, L)), selsort(replace(min(cons(N, L)), N, L)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(9) TRUE

(10) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MIN(cons(N, cons(M, L))) → IFMIN(le(N, M), cons(N, cons(M, L)))
IFMIN(true, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → MIN(cons(N, L))
IFMIN(false, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → MIN(cons(M, L))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(Y)) → false
eq(s(X), 0) → false
eq(s(X), s(Y)) → eq(X, Y)
le(0, Y) → true
le(s(X), 0) → false
le(s(X), s(Y)) → le(X, Y)
min(cons(0, nil)) → 0
min(cons(s(N), nil)) → s(N)
min(cons(N, cons(M, L))) → ifmin(le(N, M), cons(N, cons(M, L)))
ifmin(true, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(N, L))
ifmin(false, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(M, L))
replace(N, M, nil) → nil
replace(N, M, cons(K, L)) → ifrepl(eq(N, K), N, M, cons(K, L))
ifrepl(true, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(M, L)
ifrepl(false, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(K, replace(N, M, L))
selsort(nil) → nil
selsort(cons(N, L)) → ifselsort(eq(N, min(cons(N, L))), cons(N, L))
ifselsort(true, cons(N, L)) → cons(N, selsort(L))
ifselsort(false, cons(N, L)) → cons(min(cons(N, L)), selsort(replace(min(cons(N, L)), N, L)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(11) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MIN(cons(N, cons(M, L))) → IFMIN(le(N, M), cons(N, cons(M, L)))
IFMIN(true, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → MIN(cons(N, L))
IFMIN(false, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → MIN(cons(M, L))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MIN(x1)  =  MIN(x1)
cons(x1, x2)  =  cons(x2)
IFMIN(x1, x2)  =  IFMIN(x1, x2)
le(x1, x2)  =  le
true  =  true
false  =  false
0  =  0
s(x1)  =  s

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
cons1 > [MIN1, le] > [IFMIN2, true, false]
0 > [IFMIN2, true, false]
s > [MIN1, le] > [IFMIN2, true, false]

Status:
MIN1: multiset
cons1: multiset
IFMIN2: multiset
le: multiset
true: multiset
false: multiset
0: multiset
s: []


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

le(0, Y) → true
le(s(X), 0) → false
le(s(X), s(Y)) → le(X, Y)

(12) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(Y)) → false
eq(s(X), 0) → false
eq(s(X), s(Y)) → eq(X, Y)
le(0, Y) → true
le(s(X), 0) → false
le(s(X), s(Y)) → le(X, Y)
min(cons(0, nil)) → 0
min(cons(s(N), nil)) → s(N)
min(cons(N, cons(M, L))) → ifmin(le(N, M), cons(N, cons(M, L)))
ifmin(true, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(N, L))
ifmin(false, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(M, L))
replace(N, M, nil) → nil
replace(N, M, cons(K, L)) → ifrepl(eq(N, K), N, M, cons(K, L))
ifrepl(true, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(M, L)
ifrepl(false, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(K, replace(N, M, L))
selsort(nil) → nil
selsort(cons(N, L)) → ifselsort(eq(N, min(cons(N, L))), cons(N, L))
ifselsort(true, cons(N, L)) → cons(N, selsort(L))
ifselsort(false, cons(N, L)) → cons(min(cons(N, L)), selsort(replace(min(cons(N, L)), N, L)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(13) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(14) TRUE

(15) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EQ(s(X), s(Y)) → EQ(X, Y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(Y)) → false
eq(s(X), 0) → false
eq(s(X), s(Y)) → eq(X, Y)
le(0, Y) → true
le(s(X), 0) → false
le(s(X), s(Y)) → le(X, Y)
min(cons(0, nil)) → 0
min(cons(s(N), nil)) → s(N)
min(cons(N, cons(M, L))) → ifmin(le(N, M), cons(N, cons(M, L)))
ifmin(true, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(N, L))
ifmin(false, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(M, L))
replace(N, M, nil) → nil
replace(N, M, cons(K, L)) → ifrepl(eq(N, K), N, M, cons(K, L))
ifrepl(true, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(M, L)
ifrepl(false, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(K, replace(N, M, L))
selsort(nil) → nil
selsort(cons(N, L)) → ifselsort(eq(N, min(cons(N, L))), cons(N, L))
ifselsort(true, cons(N, L)) → cons(N, selsort(L))
ifselsort(false, cons(N, L)) → cons(min(cons(N, L)), selsort(replace(min(cons(N, L)), N, L)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(16) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


EQ(s(X), s(Y)) → EQ(X, Y)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[EQ2, s1]

Status:
EQ2: [1,2]
s1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(17) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(Y)) → false
eq(s(X), 0) → false
eq(s(X), s(Y)) → eq(X, Y)
le(0, Y) → true
le(s(X), 0) → false
le(s(X), s(Y)) → le(X, Y)
min(cons(0, nil)) → 0
min(cons(s(N), nil)) → s(N)
min(cons(N, cons(M, L))) → ifmin(le(N, M), cons(N, cons(M, L)))
ifmin(true, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(N, L))
ifmin(false, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(M, L))
replace(N, M, nil) → nil
replace(N, M, cons(K, L)) → ifrepl(eq(N, K), N, M, cons(K, L))
ifrepl(true, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(M, L)
ifrepl(false, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(K, replace(N, M, L))
selsort(nil) → nil
selsort(cons(N, L)) → ifselsort(eq(N, min(cons(N, L))), cons(N, L))
ifselsort(true, cons(N, L)) → cons(N, selsort(L))
ifselsort(false, cons(N, L)) → cons(min(cons(N, L)), selsort(replace(min(cons(N, L)), N, L)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(18) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(19) TRUE

(20) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

REPLACE(N, M, cons(K, L)) → IFREPL(eq(N, K), N, M, cons(K, L))
IFREPL(false, N, M, cons(K, L)) → REPLACE(N, M, L)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(Y)) → false
eq(s(X), 0) → false
eq(s(X), s(Y)) → eq(X, Y)
le(0, Y) → true
le(s(X), 0) → false
le(s(X), s(Y)) → le(X, Y)
min(cons(0, nil)) → 0
min(cons(s(N), nil)) → s(N)
min(cons(N, cons(M, L))) → ifmin(le(N, M), cons(N, cons(M, L)))
ifmin(true, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(N, L))
ifmin(false, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(M, L))
replace(N, M, nil) → nil
replace(N, M, cons(K, L)) → ifrepl(eq(N, K), N, M, cons(K, L))
ifrepl(true, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(M, L)
ifrepl(false, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(K, replace(N, M, L))
selsort(nil) → nil
selsort(cons(N, L)) → ifselsort(eq(N, min(cons(N, L))), cons(N, L))
ifselsort(true, cons(N, L)) → cons(N, selsort(L))
ifselsort(false, cons(N, L)) → cons(min(cons(N, L)), selsort(replace(min(cons(N, L)), N, L)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(21) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


IFREPL(false, N, M, cons(K, L)) → REPLACE(N, M, L)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
REPLACE(x1, x2, x3)  =  REPLACE(x1, x2, x3)
cons(x1, x2)  =  cons(x1, x2)
IFREPL(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  IFREPL(x2, x3, x4)
eq(x1, x2)  =  eq(x1, x2)
false  =  false
0  =  0
true  =  true
s(x1)  =  s

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[REPLACE3, IFREPL3] > [cons2, eq2, false, s]
0 > [cons2, eq2, false, s]
0 > true

Status:
REPLACE3: multiset
cons2: [1,2]
IFREPL3: multiset
eq2: multiset
false: multiset
0: multiset
true: multiset
s: []


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(22) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

REPLACE(N, M, cons(K, L)) → IFREPL(eq(N, K), N, M, cons(K, L))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(Y)) → false
eq(s(X), 0) → false
eq(s(X), s(Y)) → eq(X, Y)
le(0, Y) → true
le(s(X), 0) → false
le(s(X), s(Y)) → le(X, Y)
min(cons(0, nil)) → 0
min(cons(s(N), nil)) → s(N)
min(cons(N, cons(M, L))) → ifmin(le(N, M), cons(N, cons(M, L)))
ifmin(true, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(N, L))
ifmin(false, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(M, L))
replace(N, M, nil) → nil
replace(N, M, cons(K, L)) → ifrepl(eq(N, K), N, M, cons(K, L))
ifrepl(true, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(M, L)
ifrepl(false, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(K, replace(N, M, L))
selsort(nil) → nil
selsort(cons(N, L)) → ifselsort(eq(N, min(cons(N, L))), cons(N, L))
ifselsort(true, cons(N, L)) → cons(N, selsort(L))
ifselsort(false, cons(N, L)) → cons(min(cons(N, L)), selsort(replace(min(cons(N, L)), N, L)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(23) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node.

(24) TRUE

(25) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

IFSELSORT(true, cons(N, L)) → SELSORT(L)
SELSORT(cons(N, L)) → IFSELSORT(eq(N, min(cons(N, L))), cons(N, L))
IFSELSORT(false, cons(N, L)) → SELSORT(replace(min(cons(N, L)), N, L))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(Y)) → false
eq(s(X), 0) → false
eq(s(X), s(Y)) → eq(X, Y)
le(0, Y) → true
le(s(X), 0) → false
le(s(X), s(Y)) → le(X, Y)
min(cons(0, nil)) → 0
min(cons(s(N), nil)) → s(N)
min(cons(N, cons(M, L))) → ifmin(le(N, M), cons(N, cons(M, L)))
ifmin(true, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(N, L))
ifmin(false, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(M, L))
replace(N, M, nil) → nil
replace(N, M, cons(K, L)) → ifrepl(eq(N, K), N, M, cons(K, L))
ifrepl(true, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(M, L)
ifrepl(false, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(K, replace(N, M, L))
selsort(nil) → nil
selsort(cons(N, L)) → ifselsort(eq(N, min(cons(N, L))), cons(N, L))
ifselsort(true, cons(N, L)) → cons(N, selsort(L))
ifselsort(false, cons(N, L)) → cons(min(cons(N, L)), selsort(replace(min(cons(N, L)), N, L)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(26) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


IFSELSORT(true, cons(N, L)) → SELSORT(L)
IFSELSORT(false, cons(N, L)) → SELSORT(replace(min(cons(N, L)), N, L))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
IFSELSORT(x1, x2)  =  IFSELSORT(x2)
true  =  true
cons(x1, x2)  =  cons(x2)
SELSORT(x1)  =  SELSORT(x1)
eq(x1, x2)  =  eq(x1, x2)
min(x1)  =  min(x1)
false  =  false
replace(x1, x2, x3)  =  x3
0  =  0
nil  =  nil
s(x1)  =  s
ifmin(x1, x2)  =  ifmin(x1, x2)
le(x1, x2)  =  x2
ifrepl(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  x4

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[IFSELSORT1, SELSORT1] > [true, cons1, eq2] > ifmin2 > [false, 0]
min1 > [nil, s] > [true, cons1, eq2] > ifmin2 > [false, 0]

Status:
IFSELSORT1: multiset
true: multiset
cons1: [1]
SELSORT1: multiset
eq2: multiset
min1: multiset
false: multiset
0: multiset
nil: multiset
s: []
ifmin2: multiset


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

replace(N, M, nil) → nil
replace(N, M, cons(K, L)) → ifrepl(eq(N, K), N, M, cons(K, L))
ifrepl(false, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(K, replace(N, M, L))
ifrepl(true, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(M, L)

(27) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

SELSORT(cons(N, L)) → IFSELSORT(eq(N, min(cons(N, L))), cons(N, L))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(Y)) → false
eq(s(X), 0) → false
eq(s(X), s(Y)) → eq(X, Y)
le(0, Y) → true
le(s(X), 0) → false
le(s(X), s(Y)) → le(X, Y)
min(cons(0, nil)) → 0
min(cons(s(N), nil)) → s(N)
min(cons(N, cons(M, L))) → ifmin(le(N, M), cons(N, cons(M, L)))
ifmin(true, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(N, L))
ifmin(false, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(M, L))
replace(N, M, nil) → nil
replace(N, M, cons(K, L)) → ifrepl(eq(N, K), N, M, cons(K, L))
ifrepl(true, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(M, L)
ifrepl(false, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(K, replace(N, M, L))
selsort(nil) → nil
selsort(cons(N, L)) → ifselsort(eq(N, min(cons(N, L))), cons(N, L))
ifselsort(true, cons(N, L)) → cons(N, selsort(L))
ifselsort(false, cons(N, L)) → cons(min(cons(N, L)), selsort(replace(min(cons(N, L)), N, L)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(28) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node.

(29) TRUE