Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS
↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)
↳2 QDP
↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
↳4 AND
    ↳5 QDP
        ↳6 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳7 QDP
        ↳8 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
        ↳9 TRUE
    ↳10 QDP
        ↳11 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳12 QDP
        ↳13 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳14 QDP
        ↳15 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
        ↳16 TRUE
    ↳17 QDP
        ↳18 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳19 QDP
        ↳20 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
        ↳21 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

plus(0, Y) → Y
plus(s(X), Y) → s(plus(X, Y))
min(X, 0) → X
min(s(X), s(Y)) → min(X, Y)
min(min(X, Y), Z) → min(X, plus(Y, Z))
quot(0, s(Y)) → 0
quot(s(X), s(Y)) → s(quot(min(X, Y), s(Y)))

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS(s(X), Y) → PLUS(X, Y)
MIN(s(X), s(Y)) → MIN(X, Y)
MIN(min(X, Y), Z) → MIN(X, plus(Y, Z))
MIN(min(X, Y), Z) → PLUS(Y, Z)
QUOT(s(X), s(Y)) → QUOT(min(X, Y), s(Y))
QUOT(s(X), s(Y)) → MIN(X, Y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

plus(0, Y) → Y
plus(s(X), Y) → s(plus(X, Y))
min(X, 0) → X
min(s(X), s(Y)) → min(X, Y)
min(min(X, Y), Z) → min(X, plus(Y, Z))
quot(0, s(Y)) → 0
quot(s(X), s(Y)) → s(quot(min(X, Y), s(Y)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 3 SCCs with 2 less nodes.

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS(s(X), Y) → PLUS(X, Y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

plus(0, Y) → Y
plus(s(X), Y) → s(plus(X, Y))
min(X, 0) → X
min(s(X), s(Y)) → min(X, Y)
min(min(X, Y), Z) → min(X, plus(Y, Z))
quot(0, s(Y)) → 0
quot(s(X), s(Y)) → s(quot(min(X, Y), s(Y)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


PLUS(s(X), Y) → PLUS(X, Y)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
PLUS(x0, x1, x2)  =  PLUS(x1)

Tags:
PLUS has argument tags [2,3,2] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
PLUS(x1, x2)  =  x2
s(x1)  =  s(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
s1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

plus(0, Y) → Y
plus(s(X), Y) → s(plus(X, Y))
min(X, 0) → X
min(s(X), s(Y)) → min(X, Y)
min(min(X, Y), Z) → min(X, plus(Y, Z))
quot(0, s(Y)) → 0
quot(s(X), s(Y)) → s(quot(min(X, Y), s(Y)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(9) TRUE

(10) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MIN(min(X, Y), Z) → MIN(X, plus(Y, Z))
MIN(s(X), s(Y)) → MIN(X, Y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

plus(0, Y) → Y
plus(s(X), Y) → s(plus(X, Y))
min(X, 0) → X
min(s(X), s(Y)) → min(X, Y)
min(min(X, Y), Z) → min(X, plus(Y, Z))
quot(0, s(Y)) → 0
quot(s(X), s(Y)) → s(quot(min(X, Y), s(Y)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(11) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MIN(min(X, Y), Z) → MIN(X, plus(Y, Z))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
MIN(x0, x1, x2)  =  MIN(x1, x2)

Tags:
MIN has argument tags [2,0,2] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MIN(x1, x2)  =  MIN
min(x1, x2)  =  min(x1, x2)
Z  =  Z
plus(x1, x2)  =  plus(x2)
s(x1)  =  x1
0  =  0

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[min2, plus1] > MIN > Z
0 > Z

Status:
MIN: []
min2: [1,2]
Z: []
plus1: [1]
0: []


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(12) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MIN(s(X), s(Y)) → MIN(X, Y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

plus(0, Y) → Y
plus(s(X), Y) → s(plus(X, Y))
min(X, 0) → X
min(s(X), s(Y)) → min(X, Y)
min(min(X, Y), Z) → min(X, plus(Y, Z))
quot(0, s(Y)) → 0
quot(s(X), s(Y)) → s(quot(min(X, Y), s(Y)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(13) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MIN(s(X), s(Y)) → MIN(X, Y)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
MIN(x0, x1, x2)  =  MIN(x0, x2)

Tags:
MIN has argument tags [1,0,0] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MIN(x1, x2)  =  MIN
s(x1)  =  s(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[MIN, s1]

Status:
MIN: []
s1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(14) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

plus(0, Y) → Y
plus(s(X), Y) → s(plus(X, Y))
min(X, 0) → X
min(s(X), s(Y)) → min(X, Y)
min(min(X, Y), Z) → min(X, plus(Y, Z))
quot(0, s(Y)) → 0
quot(s(X), s(Y)) → s(quot(min(X, Y), s(Y)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(15) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(16) TRUE

(17) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

QUOT(s(X), s(Y)) → QUOT(min(X, Y), s(Y))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

plus(0, Y) → Y
plus(s(X), Y) → s(plus(X, Y))
min(X, 0) → X
min(s(X), s(Y)) → min(X, Y)
min(min(X, Y), Z) → min(X, plus(Y, Z))
quot(0, s(Y)) → 0
quot(s(X), s(Y)) → s(quot(min(X, Y), s(Y)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(18) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


QUOT(s(X), s(Y)) → QUOT(min(X, Y), s(Y))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
QUOT(x0, x1, x2)  =  QUOT(x1, x2)

Tags:
QUOT has argument tags [3,0,2] and root tag 0

Comparison: MS
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
QUOT(x1, x2)  =  x2
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
min(x1, x2)  =  min(x1)
0  =  0
Z  =  Z
plus(x1, x2)  =  plus(x1, x2)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
s1 > [Z, plus2] > min1
0 > min1

Status:
s1: [1]
min1: [1]
0: []
Z: []
plus2: [2,1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(19) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

plus(0, Y) → Y
plus(s(X), Y) → s(plus(X, Y))
min(X, 0) → X
min(s(X), s(Y)) → min(X, Y)
min(min(X, Y), Z) → min(X, plus(Y, Z))
quot(0, s(Y)) → 0
quot(s(X), s(Y)) → s(quot(min(X, Y), s(Y)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(20) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(21) TRUE