(0) Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
ackin(s(X), s(Y)) → u21(ackin(s(X), Y), X)
u21(ackout(X), Y) → u22(ackin(Y, X))
Q is empty.
(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.
(2) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
ACKIN(s(X), s(Y)) → U21(ackin(s(X), Y), X)
ACKIN(s(X), s(Y)) → ACKIN(s(X), Y)
U21(ackout(X), Y) → ACKIN(Y, X)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
ackin(s(X), s(Y)) → u21(ackin(s(X), Y), X)
u21(ackout(X), Y) → u22(ackin(Y, X))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 2 less nodes.
(4) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
ACKIN(s(X), s(Y)) → ACKIN(s(X), Y)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
ackin(s(X), s(Y)) → u21(ackin(s(X), Y), X)
u21(ackout(X), Y) → u22(ackin(Y, X))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].
The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
ACKIN(s(X), s(Y)) → ACKIN(s(X), Y)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
ACKIN(
x1,
x2) =
ACKIN(
x2)
Tags:
ACKIN has tags [0,1]
Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Homeomorphic Embedding Order
The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:
none
(6) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
ackin(s(X), s(Y)) → u21(ackin(s(X), Y), X)
u21(ackout(X), Y) → u22(ackin(Y, X))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(7) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.
(8) TRUE