(0) Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
g(f(x), y) → f(h(x, y))
h(x, y) → g(x, f(y))
Q is empty.
(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.
(2) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
G(f(x), y) → H(x, y)
H(x, y) → G(x, f(y))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
g(f(x), y) → f(h(x, y))
h(x, y) → g(x, f(y))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(3) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].
The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
H(x, y) → G(x, f(y))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:
POL(G(x1, x2)) = x1
POL(H(x1, x2)) = 1 + x1
POL(f(x1)) = 1 + x1
The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:
none
(4) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
G(f(x), y) → H(x, y)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
g(f(x), y) → f(h(x, y))
h(x, y) → g(x, f(y))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(5) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node.
(6) TRUE