Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmp7bQUH4/t003.xml

Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS

↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)

↳2 QDP

↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

↳4 AND

    ↳5 QDP

        ↳6 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳7 QDP

        ↳8 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

        ↳9 TRUE

    ↳10 QDP

        ↳11 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳12 QDP

        ↳13 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

        ↳14 TRUE

    ↳15 QDP

        ↳16 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳17 QDP

        ↳18 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳19 QDP

        ↳20 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

        ↳21 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
<=(0, y) → true
<=(s(x), 0) → false
<=(s(x), s(y)) → <=(x, y)
if(true, x, y) → x
if(false, x, y) → y
perfectp(0) → false
perfectp(s(x)) → f(x, s(0), s(x), s(x))
f(0, y, 0, u) → true
f(0, y, s(z), u) → false
f(s(x), 0, z, u) → f(x, u, -(z, s(x)), u)
f(s(x), s(y), z, u) → if(<=(x, y), f(s(x), -(y, x), z, u), f(x, u, z, u))

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

-¹(s(x), s(y)) → -¹(x, y)
<=¹(s(x), s(y)) → <=¹(x, y)
PERFECTP(s(x)) → F(x, s(0), s(x), s(x))
F(s(x), 0, z, u) → F(x, u, -(z, s(x)), u)
F(s(x), 0, z, u) → -¹(z, s(x))
F(s(x), s(y), z, u) → IF(<=(x, y), f(s(x), -(y, x), z, u), f(x, u, z, u))
F(s(x), s(y), z, u) → <=¹(x, y)
F(s(x), s(y), z, u) → F(s(x), -(y, x), z, u)
F(s(x), s(y), z, u) → -¹(y, x)
F(s(x), s(y), z, u) → F(x, u, z, u)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
<=(0, y) → true
<=(s(x), 0) → false
<=(s(x), s(y)) → <=(x, y)
if(true, x, y) → x
if(false, x, y) → y
perfectp(0) → false
perfectp(s(x)) → f(x, s(0), s(x), s(x))
f(0, y, 0, u) → true
f(0, y, s(z), u) → false
f(s(x), 0, z, u) → f(x, u, -(z, s(x)), u)
f(s(x), s(y), z, u) → if(<=(x, y), f(s(x), -(y, x), z, u), f(x, u, z, u))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 3 SCCs with 5 less nodes.

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

<=¹(s(x), s(y)) → <=¹(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
<=(0, y) → true
<=(s(x), 0) → false
<=(s(x), s(y)) → <=(x, y)
if(true, x, y) → x
if(false, x, y) → y
perfectp(0) → false
perfectp(s(x)) → f(x, s(0), s(x), s(x))
f(0, y, 0, u) → true
f(0, y, s(z), u) → false
f(s(x), 0, z, u) → f(x, u, -(z, s(x)), u)
f(s(x), s(y), z, u) → if(<=(x, y), f(s(x), -(y, x), z, u), f(x, u, z, u))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

<=¹(s(x), s(y)) → <=¹(x, y)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
<=¹(x0, x1, x2) = <=¹(x1)

Tags:
<=¹ has argument tags [2,0,0] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(<=¹(x₁, x₂)) = 1
POL(s(x₁)) = 1 + x₁

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
<=(0, y) → true
<=(s(x), 0) → false
<=(s(x), s(y)) → <=(x, y)
if(true, x, y) → x
if(false, x, y) → y
perfectp(0) → false
perfectp(s(x)) → f(x, s(0), s(x), s(x))
f(0, y, 0, u) → true
f(0, y, s(z), u) → false
f(s(x), 0, z, u) → f(x, u, -(z, s(x)), u)
f(s(x), s(y), z, u) → if(<=(x, y), f(s(x), -(y, x), z, u), f(x, u, z, u))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(9) TRUE

(10) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

-¹(s(x), s(y)) → -¹(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
<=(0, y) → true
<=(s(x), 0) → false
<=(s(x), s(y)) → <=(x, y)
if(true, x, y) → x
if(false, x, y) → y
perfectp(0) → false
perfectp(s(x)) → f(x, s(0), s(x), s(x))
f(0, y, 0, u) → true
f(0, y, s(z), u) → false
f(s(x), 0, z, u) → f(x, u, -(z, s(x)), u)
f(s(x), s(y), z, u) → if(<=(x, y), f(s(x), -(y, x), z, u), f(x, u, z, u))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(11) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

-¹(s(x), s(y)) → -¹(x, y)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
-¹(x0, x1, x2) = -¹(x1)

Tags:
-¹ has argument tags [2,0,0] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(-¹(x₁, x₂)) = 1
POL(s(x₁)) = 1 + x₁

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(12) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
<=(0, y) → true
<=(s(x), 0) → false
<=(s(x), s(y)) → <=(x, y)
if(true, x, y) → x
if(false, x, y) → y
perfectp(0) → false
perfectp(s(x)) → f(x, s(0), s(x), s(x))
f(0, y, 0, u) → true
f(0, y, s(z), u) → false
f(s(x), 0, z, u) → f(x, u, -(z, s(x)), u)
f(s(x), s(y), z, u) → if(<=(x, y), f(s(x), -(y, x), z, u), f(x, u, z, u))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(13) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(14) TRUE

(15) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

F(s(x), s(y), z, u) → F(s(x), -(y, x), z, u)
F(s(x), 0, z, u) → F(x, u, -(z, s(x)), u)
F(s(x), s(y), z, u) → F(x, u, z, u)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
<=(0, y) → true
<=(s(x), 0) → false
<=(s(x), s(y)) → <=(x, y)
if(true, x, y) → x
if(false, x, y) → y
perfectp(0) → false
perfectp(s(x)) → f(x, s(0), s(x), s(x))
f(0, y, 0, u) → true
f(0, y, s(z), u) → false
f(s(x), 0, z, u) → f(x, u, -(z, s(x)), u)
f(s(x), s(y), z, u) → if(<=(x, y), f(s(x), -(y, x), z, u), f(x, u, z, u))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(16) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

F(s(x), 0, z, u) → F(x, u, -(z, s(x)), u)
F(s(x), s(y), z, u) → F(x, u, z, u)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
F(x0, x1, x2, x3, x4) = F(x1, x4)

Tags:
F has argument tags [6,4,4,0,0] and root tag 0

Comparison: MS
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(-(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(0) = 1
POL(F(x₁, x₂, x₃, x₄)) = x₃ + x₄
POL(s(x₁)) = 1 + x₁

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)

(17) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

F(s(x), s(y), z, u) → F(s(x), -(y, x), z, u)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
<=(0, y) → true
<=(s(x), 0) → false
<=(s(x), s(y)) → <=(x, y)
if(true, x, y) → x
if(false, x, y) → y
perfectp(0) → false
perfectp(s(x)) → f(x, s(0), s(x), s(x))
f(0, y, 0, u) → true
f(0, y, s(z), u) → false
f(s(x), 0, z, u) → f(x, u, -(z, s(x)), u)
f(s(x), s(y), z, u) → if(<=(x, y), f(s(x), -(y, x), z, u), f(x, u, z, u))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(18) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

F(s(x), s(y), z, u) → F(s(x), -(y, x), z, u)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
F(x0, x1, x2, x3, x4) = F(x1, x2)

Tags:
F has argument tags [1,3,0,0,6] and root tag 0

Comparison: DMS
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(-(x₁, x₂)) = x₁
POL(0) = 0
POL(F(x₁, x₂, x₃, x₄)) = x₃
POL(s(x₁)) = 1 + x₁

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(19) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
<=(0, y) → true
<=(s(x), 0) → false
<=(s(x), s(y)) → <=(x, y)
if(true, x, y) → x
if(false, x, y) → y
perfectp(0) → false
perfectp(s(x)) → f(x, s(0), s(x), s(x))
f(0, y, 0, u) → true
f(0, y, s(z), u) → false
f(s(x), 0, z, u) → f(x, u, -(z, s(x)), u)
f(s(x), s(y), z, u) → if(<=(x, y), f(s(x), -(y, x), z, u), f(x, u, z, u))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(20) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(0) Obligation:

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(2) Obligation:

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(7) Obligation:

(8) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(9) TRUE

(10) Obligation:

(11) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(12) Obligation:

(13) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(14) TRUE

(15) Obligation:

(16) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(17) Obligation:

(18) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(19) Obligation:

(20) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(21) TRUE