(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

p(a(x0), p(a(b(x1)), x2)) → p(a(b(a(x2))), p(a(a(x1)), x2))

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

P(a(x0), p(a(b(x1)), x2)) → P(a(b(a(x2))), p(a(a(x1)), x2))
P(a(x0), p(a(b(x1)), x2)) → P(a(a(x1)), x2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

p(a(x0), p(a(b(x1)), x2)) → p(a(b(a(x2))), p(a(a(x1)), x2))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


P(a(x0), p(a(b(x1)), x2)) → P(a(a(x1)), x2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
P(x0, x1, x2)  =  P(x0, x1)

Tags:
P has argument tags [2,1,0] and root tag 0

Comparison: MS
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
P(x1, x2)  =  x2
a(x1)  =  a
p(x1, x2)  =  p(x2)
b(x1)  =  b

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
a > p1 > b

Status:
a: []
p1: [1]
b: []


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

p(a(x0), p(a(b(x1)), x2)) → p(a(b(a(x2))), p(a(a(x1)), x2))

(4) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

P(a(x0), p(a(b(x1)), x2)) → P(a(b(a(x2))), p(a(a(x1)), x2))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

p(a(x0), p(a(b(x1)), x2)) → p(a(b(a(x2))), p(a(a(x1)), x2))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


P(a(x0), p(a(b(x1)), x2)) → P(a(b(a(x2))), p(a(a(x1)), x2))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
P(x0, x1, x2)  =  P(x1, x2)

Tags:
P has argument tags [3,0,0] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
P(x1, x2)  =  x1
a(x1)  =  x1
p(x1, x2)  =  p(x1, x2)
b(x1)  =  b(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[p2, b1]

Status:
p2: [2,1]
b1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(6) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

p(a(x0), p(a(b(x1)), x2)) → p(a(b(a(x2))), p(a(a(x1)), x2))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(7) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(8) TRUE