Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

not(not(x)) → x
not(or(x, y)) → and(not(not(not(x))), not(not(not(y))))
not(and(x, y)) → or(not(not(not(x))), not(not(not(y))))

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

NOT(or(x, y)) → NOT(not(not(x)))
NOT(or(x, y)) → NOT(not(x))
NOT(or(x, y)) → NOT(x)
NOT(or(x, y)) → NOT(not(not(y)))
NOT(or(x, y)) → NOT(not(y))
NOT(or(x, y)) → NOT(y)
NOT(and(x, y)) → NOT(not(not(x)))
NOT(and(x, y)) → NOT(not(x))
NOT(and(x, y)) → NOT(x)
NOT(and(x, y)) → NOT(not(not(y)))
NOT(and(x, y)) → NOT(not(y))
NOT(and(x, y)) → NOT(y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

not(not(x)) → x
not(or(x, y)) → and(not(not(not(x))), not(not(not(y))))
not(and(x, y)) → or(not(not(not(x))), not(not(not(y))))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

NOT(or(x, y)) → NOT(not(not(x)))
NOT(or(x, y)) → NOT(not(x))
NOT(or(x, y)) → NOT(x)
NOT(or(x, y)) → NOT(not(not(y)))
NOT(or(x, y)) → NOT(not(y))
NOT(or(x, y)) → NOT(y)
NOT(and(x, y)) → NOT(not(not(x)))
NOT(and(x, y)) → NOT(not(x))
NOT(and(x, y)) → NOT(x)
NOT(and(x, y)) → NOT(not(not(y)))
NOT(and(x, y)) → NOT(not(y))
NOT(and(x, y)) → NOT(y)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
NOT(x0, x1)  =  NOT(x0)

Tags:
NOT has argument tags [0,1] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
NOT(x1)  =  NOT(x1)
or(x1, x2)  =  or(x1, x2)
not(x1)  =  x1
and(x1, x2)  =  and(x1, x2)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[or₂, and₂]

Status:

NOT₁: [1]
or₂: [1,2]
and₂: [1,2]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

not(not(x)) → x
not(or(x, y)) → and(not(not(not(x))), not(not(not(y))))
not(and(x, y)) → or(not(not(not(x))), not(not(not(y))))

(4) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

not(not(x)) → x
not(or(x, y)) → and(not(not(not(x))), not(not(not(y))))
not(and(x, y)) → or(not(not(not(x))), not(not(not(y))))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(5) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(6) TRUE