Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmprVtVG8/filliatre3.xml

Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS

↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)

↳2 QDP

↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

↳4 AND

    ↳5 QDP

        ↳6 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳7 QDP

        ↳8 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

        ↳9 QDP

        ↳10 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳11 QDP

        ↳12 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

        ↳13 QDP

        ↳14 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳15 QDP

        ↳16 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

        ↳17 TRUE

    ↳18 QDP

        ↳19 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳20 QDP

        ↳21 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

        ↳22 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

g(A) → A
g(B) → A
g(B) → B
g(C) → A
g(C) → B
g(C) → C
foldB(t, 0) → t
foldB(t, s(n)) → f(foldB(t, n), B)
foldC(t, 0) → t
foldC(t, s(n)) → f(foldC(t, n), C)
f(t, x) → f'(t, g(x))
f'(triple(a, b, c), C) → triple(a, b, s(c))
f'(triple(a, b, c), B) → f(triple(a, b, c), A)
f'(triple(a, b, c), A) → f''(foldB(triple(s(a), 0, c), b))
f''(triple(a, b, c)) → foldC(triple(a, b, 0), c)
fold(t, x, 0) → t
fold(t, x, s(n)) → f(fold(t, x, n), x)

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FOLDB(t, s(n)) → F(foldB(t, n), B)
FOLDB(t, s(n)) → FOLDB(t, n)
FOLDC(t, s(n)) → F(foldC(t, n), C)
FOLDC(t, s(n)) → FOLDC(t, n)
F(t, x) → F'(t, g(x))
F(t, x) → G(x)
F'(triple(a, b, c), B) → F(triple(a, b, c), A)
F'(triple(a, b, c), A) → F''(foldB(triple(s(a), 0, c), b))
F'(triple(a, b, c), A) → FOLDB(triple(s(a), 0, c), b)
F''(triple(a, b, c)) → FOLDC(triple(a, b, 0), c)
FOLD(t, x, s(n)) → F(fold(t, x, n), x)
FOLD(t, x, s(n)) → FOLD(t, x, n)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

g(A) → A
g(B) → A
g(B) → B
g(C) → A
g(C) → B
g(C) → C
foldB(t, 0) → t
foldB(t, s(n)) → f(foldB(t, n), B)
foldC(t, 0) → t
foldC(t, s(n)) → f(foldC(t, n), C)
f(t, x) → f'(t, g(x))
f'(triple(a, b, c), C) → triple(a, b, s(c))
f'(triple(a, b, c), B) → f(triple(a, b, c), A)
f'(triple(a, b, c), A) → f''(foldB(triple(s(a), 0, c), b))
f''(triple(a, b, c)) → foldC(triple(a, b, 0), c)
fold(t, x, 0) → t
fold(t, x, s(n)) → f(fold(t, x, n), x)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 2 SCCs with 2 less nodes.

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

F(t, x) → F'(t, g(x))
F'(triple(a, b, c), B) → F(triple(a, b, c), A)
F'(triple(a, b, c), A) → F''(foldB(triple(s(a), 0, c), b))
F''(triple(a, b, c)) → FOLDC(triple(a, b, 0), c)
FOLDC(t, s(n)) → F(foldC(t, n), C)
FOLDC(t, s(n)) → FOLDC(t, n)
F'(triple(a, b, c), A) → FOLDB(triple(s(a), 0, c), b)
FOLDB(t, s(n)) → F(foldB(t, n), B)
FOLDB(t, s(n)) → FOLDB(t, n)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

g(A) → A
g(B) → A
g(B) → B
g(C) → A
g(C) → B
g(C) → C
foldB(t, 0) → t
foldB(t, s(n)) → f(foldB(t, n), B)
foldC(t, 0) → t
foldC(t, s(n)) → f(foldC(t, n), C)
f(t, x) → f'(t, g(x))
f'(triple(a, b, c), C) → triple(a, b, s(c))
f'(triple(a, b, c), B) → f(triple(a, b, c), A)
f'(triple(a, b, c), A) → f''(foldB(triple(s(a), 0, c), b))
f''(triple(a, b, c)) → foldC(triple(a, b, 0), c)
fold(t, x, 0) → t
fold(t, x, s(n)) → f(fold(t, x, n), x)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

FOLDB(t, s(n)) → F(foldB(t, n), B)
FOLDB(t, s(n)) → FOLDB(t, n)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(A) = 0
POL(B) = 0
POL(C) = 0
POL(F(x₁, x₂)) = x₁
POL(F'(x₁, x₂)) = x₁
POL(F''(x₁)) = x₁
POL(FOLDB(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(FOLDC(x₁, x₂)) = x₁
POL(f(x₁, x₂)) = x₁
POL(f'(x₁, x₂)) = x₁
POL(f''(x₁)) = x₁
POL(foldB(x₁, x₂)) = x₁
POL(foldC(x₁, x₂)) = x₁
POL(g(x₁)) = 0
POL(s(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(triple(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = x₂

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

foldB(t, 0) → t
foldB(t, s(n)) → f(foldB(t, n), B)
foldC(t, 0) → t
foldC(t, s(n)) → f(foldC(t, n), C)
f(t, x) → f'(t, g(x))
f'(triple(a, b, c), B) → f(triple(a, b, c), A)
f'(triple(a, b, c), A) → f''(foldB(triple(s(a), 0, c), b))
f''(triple(a, b, c)) → foldC(triple(a, b, 0), c)
f'(triple(a, b, c), C) → triple(a, b, s(c))

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

F(t, x) → F'(t, g(x))
F'(triple(a, b, c), B) → F(triple(a, b, c), A)
F'(triple(a, b, c), A) → F''(foldB(triple(s(a), 0, c), b))
F''(triple(a, b, c)) → FOLDC(triple(a, b, 0), c)
FOLDC(t, s(n)) → F(foldC(t, n), C)
FOLDC(t, s(n)) → FOLDC(t, n)
F'(triple(a, b, c), A) → FOLDB(triple(s(a), 0, c), b)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

g(A) → A
g(B) → A
g(B) → B
g(C) → A
g(C) → B
g(C) → C
foldB(t, 0) → t
foldB(t, s(n)) → f(foldB(t, n), B)
foldC(t, 0) → t
foldC(t, s(n)) → f(foldC(t, n), C)
f(t, x) → f'(t, g(x))
f'(triple(a, b, c), C) → triple(a, b, s(c))
f'(triple(a, b, c), B) → f(triple(a, b, c), A)
f'(triple(a, b, c), A) → f''(foldB(triple(s(a), 0, c), b))
f''(triple(a, b, c)) → foldC(triple(a, b, 0), c)
fold(t, x, 0) → t
fold(t, x, s(n)) → f(fold(t, x, n), x)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.

(9) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

F'(triple(a, b, c), B) → F(triple(a, b, c), A)
F(t, x) → F'(t, g(x))
F'(triple(a, b, c), A) → F''(foldB(triple(s(a), 0, c), b))
F''(triple(a, b, c)) → FOLDC(triple(a, b, 0), c)
FOLDC(t, s(n)) → F(foldC(t, n), C)
FOLDC(t, s(n)) → FOLDC(t, n)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

g(A) → A
g(B) → A
g(B) → B
g(C) → A
g(C) → B
g(C) → C
foldB(t, 0) → t
foldB(t, s(n)) → f(foldB(t, n), B)
foldC(t, 0) → t
foldC(t, s(n)) → f(foldC(t, n), C)
f(t, x) → f'(t, g(x))
f'(triple(a, b, c), C) → triple(a, b, s(c))
f'(triple(a, b, c), B) → f(triple(a, b, c), A)
f'(triple(a, b, c), A) → f''(foldB(triple(s(a), 0, c), b))
f''(triple(a, b, c)) → foldC(triple(a, b, 0), c)
fold(t, x, 0) → t
fold(t, x, s(n)) → f(fold(t, x, n), x)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(10) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

FOLDC(t, s(n)) → F(foldC(t, n), C)
FOLDC(t, s(n)) → FOLDC(t, n)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(A) = 0
POL(B) = 0
POL(C) = 0
POL(F(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(F'(x₁, x₂)) = x₁
POL(F''(x₁)) = x₁
POL(FOLDC(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(f(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁
POL(f'(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁
POL(f''(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(foldB(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(foldC(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(g(x₁)) = 0
POL(s(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(triple(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = x₂ + x₃

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

foldB(t, 0) → t
foldB(t, s(n)) → f(foldB(t, n), B)
foldC(t, 0) → t
foldC(t, s(n)) → f(foldC(t, n), C)
f(t, x) → f'(t, g(x))
f'(triple(a, b, c), B) → f(triple(a, b, c), A)
f'(triple(a, b, c), A) → f''(foldB(triple(s(a), 0, c), b))
f''(triple(a, b, c)) → foldC(triple(a, b, 0), c)
f'(triple(a, b, c), C) → triple(a, b, s(c))

(11) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

F'(triple(a, b, c), B) → F(triple(a, b, c), A)
F(t, x) → F'(t, g(x))
F'(triple(a, b, c), A) → F''(foldB(triple(s(a), 0, c), b))
F''(triple(a, b, c)) → FOLDC(triple(a, b, 0), c)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

g(A) → A
g(B) → A
g(B) → B
g(C) → A
g(C) → B
g(C) → C
foldB(t, 0) → t
foldB(t, s(n)) → f(foldB(t, n), B)
foldC(t, 0) → t
foldC(t, s(n)) → f(foldC(t, n), C)
f(t, x) → f'(t, g(x))
f'(triple(a, b, c), C) → triple(a, b, s(c))
f'(triple(a, b, c), B) → f(triple(a, b, c), A)
f'(triple(a, b, c), A) → f''(foldB(triple(s(a), 0, c), b))
f''(triple(a, b, c)) → foldC(triple(a, b, 0), c)
fold(t, x, 0) → t
fold(t, x, s(n)) → f(fold(t, x, n), x)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(12) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 2 less nodes.

(13) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

F(t, x) → F'(t, g(x))
F'(triple(a, b, c), B) → F(triple(a, b, c), A)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

g(A) → A
g(B) → A
g(B) → B
g(C) → A
g(C) → B
g(C) → C
foldB(t, 0) → t
foldB(t, s(n)) → f(foldB(t, n), B)
foldC(t, 0) → t
foldC(t, s(n)) → f(foldC(t, n), C)
f(t, x) → f'(t, g(x))
f'(triple(a, b, c), C) → triple(a, b, s(c))
f'(triple(a, b, c), B) → f(triple(a, b, c), A)
f'(triple(a, b, c), A) → f''(foldB(triple(s(a), 0, c), b))
f''(triple(a, b, c)) → foldC(triple(a, b, 0), c)
fold(t, x, 0) → t
fold(t, x, s(n)) → f(fold(t, x, n), x)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(14) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

F'(triple(a, b, c), B) → F(triple(a, b, c), A)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(A) = 0
POL(B) = 1
POL(C) = 1
POL(F(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(F'(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(g(x₁)) = x₁
POL(triple(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 0

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

g(A) → A
g(B) → A
g(B) → B
g(C) → A
g(C) → B
g(C) → C

(15) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

F(t, x) → F'(t, g(x))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

g(A) → A
g(B) → A
g(B) → B
g(C) → A
g(C) → B
g(C) → C
foldB(t, 0) → t
foldB(t, s(n)) → f(foldB(t, n), B)
foldC(t, 0) → t
foldC(t, s(n)) → f(foldC(t, n), C)
f(t, x) → f'(t, g(x))
f'(triple(a, b, c), C) → triple(a, b, s(c))
f'(triple(a, b, c), B) → f(triple(a, b, c), A)
f'(triple(a, b, c), A) → f''(foldB(triple(s(a), 0, c), b))
f''(triple(a, b, c)) → foldC(triple(a, b, 0), c)
fold(t, x, 0) → t
fold(t, x, s(n)) → f(fold(t, x, n), x)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(16) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node.

(17) TRUE

(18) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FOLD(t, x, s(n)) → FOLD(t, x, n)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

g(A) → A
g(B) → A
g(B) → B
g(C) → A
g(C) → B
g(C) → C
foldB(t, 0) → t
foldB(t, s(n)) → f(foldB(t, n), B)
foldC(t, 0) → t
foldC(t, s(n)) → f(foldC(t, n), C)
f(t, x) → f'(t, g(x))
f'(triple(a, b, c), C) → triple(a, b, s(c))
f'(triple(a, b, c), B) → f(triple(a, b, c), A)
f'(triple(a, b, c), A) → f''(foldB(triple(s(a), 0, c), b))
f''(triple(a, b, c)) → foldC(triple(a, b, 0), c)
fold(t, x, 0) → t
fold(t, x, s(n)) → f(fold(t, x, n), x)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(19) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

FOLD(t, x, s(n)) → FOLD(t, x, n)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(FOLD(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = x₃
POL(s(x₁)) = 1 + x₁

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(20) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

g(A) → A
g(B) → A
g(B) → B
g(C) → A
g(C) → B
g(C) → C
foldB(t, 0) → t
foldB(t, s(n)) → f(foldB(t, n), B)
foldC(t, 0) → t
foldC(t, s(n)) → f(foldC(t, n), C)
f(t, x) → f'(t, g(x))
f'(triple(a, b, c), C) → triple(a, b, s(c))
f'(triple(a, b, c), B) → f(triple(a, b, c), A)
f'(triple(a, b, c), A) → f''(foldB(triple(s(a), 0, c), b))
f''(triple(a, b, c)) → foldC(triple(a, b, 0), c)
fold(t, x, 0) → t
fold(t, x, s(n)) → f(fold(t, x, n), x)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(21) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(0) Obligation:

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(2) Obligation:

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(7) Obligation:

(8) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(9) Obligation:

(10) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(11) Obligation:

(12) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(13) Obligation:

(14) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(15) Obligation:

(16) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(17) TRUE

(18) Obligation:

(19) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(20) Obligation:

(21) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(22) TRUE