Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS
↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)
↳2 QDP
↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
↳4 AND
    ↳5 QDP
        ↳6 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳7 QDP
        ↳8 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
        ↳9 TRUE
    ↳10 QDP
        ↳11 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳12 QDP
        ↳13 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
        ↳14 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z) → app(app(:, x), app(app(:, y), z))
app(app(:, app(app(+, x), y)), z) → app(app(+, app(app(:, x), z)), app(app(:, y), z))
app(app(:, z), app(app(+, x), app(f, y))) → app(app(:, app(app(g, z), y)), app(app(+, x), a))
app(app(map, f), nil) → nil
app(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(cons, app(f, x)), app(app(map, f), xs))
app(app(filter, f), nil) → nil
app(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(app(app(filter2, app(f, x)), f), x), xs)
app(app(app(app(filter2, true), f), x), xs) → app(app(cons, x), app(app(filter, f), xs))
app(app(app(app(filter2, false), f), x), xs) → app(app(filter, f), xs)

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z) → APP(app(:, x), app(app(:, y), z))
APP(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z) → APP(app(:, y), z)
APP(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z) → APP(:, y)
APP(app(:, app(app(+, x), y)), z) → APP(app(+, app(app(:, x), z)), app(app(:, y), z))
APP(app(:, app(app(+, x), y)), z) → APP(+, app(app(:, x), z))
APP(app(:, app(app(+, x), y)), z) → APP(app(:, x), z)
APP(app(:, app(app(+, x), y)), z) → APP(:, x)
APP(app(:, app(app(+, x), y)), z) → APP(app(:, y), z)
APP(app(:, app(app(+, x), y)), z) → APP(:, y)
APP(app(:, z), app(app(+, x), app(f, y))) → APP(app(:, app(app(g, z), y)), app(app(+, x), a))
APP(app(:, z), app(app(+, x), app(f, y))) → APP(:, app(app(g, z), y))
APP(app(:, z), app(app(+, x), app(f, y))) → APP(app(g, z), y)
APP(app(:, z), app(app(+, x), app(f, y))) → APP(g, z)
APP(app(:, z), app(app(+, x), app(f, y))) → APP(app(+, x), a)
APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(app(cons, app(f, x)), app(app(map, f), xs))
APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(cons, app(f, x))
APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(f, x)
APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(app(map, f), xs)
APP(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(app(app(app(filter2, app(f, x)), f), x), xs)
APP(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(app(app(filter2, app(f, x)), f), x)
APP(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(app(filter2, app(f, x)), f)
APP(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(filter2, app(f, x))
APP(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(f, x)
APP(app(app(app(filter2, true), f), x), xs) → APP(app(cons, x), app(app(filter, f), xs))
APP(app(app(app(filter2, true), f), x), xs) → APP(cons, x)
APP(app(app(app(filter2, true), f), x), xs) → APP(app(filter, f), xs)
APP(app(app(app(filter2, true), f), x), xs) → APP(filter, f)
APP(app(app(app(filter2, false), f), x), xs) → APP(app(filter, f), xs)
APP(app(app(app(filter2, false), f), x), xs) → APP(filter, f)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z) → app(app(:, x), app(app(:, y), z))
app(app(:, app(app(+, x), y)), z) → app(app(+, app(app(:, x), z)), app(app(:, y), z))
app(app(:, z), app(app(+, x), app(f, y))) → app(app(:, app(app(g, z), y)), app(app(+, x), a))
app(app(map, f), nil) → nil
app(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(cons, app(f, x)), app(app(map, f), xs))
app(app(filter, f), nil) → nil
app(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(app(app(filter2, app(f, x)), f), x), xs)
app(app(app(app(filter2, true), f), x), xs) → app(app(cons, x), app(app(filter, f), xs))
app(app(app(app(filter2, false), f), x), xs) → app(app(filter, f), xs)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 2 SCCs with 20 less nodes.

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z) → APP(app(:, y), z)
APP(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z) → APP(app(:, x), app(app(:, y), z))
APP(app(:, app(app(+, x), y)), z) → APP(app(:, x), z)
APP(app(:, app(app(+, x), y)), z) → APP(app(:, y), z)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z) → app(app(:, x), app(app(:, y), z))
app(app(:, app(app(+, x), y)), z) → app(app(+, app(app(:, x), z)), app(app(:, y), z))
app(app(:, z), app(app(+, x), app(f, y))) → app(app(:, app(app(g, z), y)), app(app(+, x), a))
app(app(map, f), nil) → nil
app(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(cons, app(f, x)), app(app(map, f), xs))
app(app(filter, f), nil) → nil
app(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(app(app(filter2, app(f, x)), f), x), xs)
app(app(app(app(filter2, true), f), x), xs) → app(app(cons, x), app(app(filter, f), xs))
app(app(app(app(filter2, false), f), x), xs) → app(app(filter, f), xs)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


APP(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z) → APP(app(:, y), z)
APP(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z) → APP(app(:, x), app(app(:, y), z))
APP(app(:, app(app(+, x), y)), z) → APP(app(:, x), z)
APP(app(:, app(app(+, x), y)), z) → APP(app(:, y), z)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
APP(x1, x2)  =  x1
app(x1, x2)  =  app(x1, x2)
:  =  :
+  =  +
g  =  g
a  =  a

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
: > app2 > +
: > g > +
a > +

Status:
app2: [2,1]
:: []
+: []
g: []
a: []


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z) → app(app(:, x), app(app(:, y), z))
app(app(:, app(app(+, x), y)), z) → app(app(+, app(app(:, x), z)), app(app(:, y), z))
app(app(:, z), app(app(+, x), app(f, y))) → app(app(:, app(app(g, z), y)), app(app(+, x), a))
app(app(map, f), nil) → nil
app(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(cons, app(f, x)), app(app(map, f), xs))
app(app(filter, f), nil) → nil
app(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(app(app(filter2, app(f, x)), f), x), xs)
app(app(app(app(filter2, true), f), x), xs) → app(app(cons, x), app(app(filter, f), xs))
app(app(app(app(filter2, false), f), x), xs) → app(app(filter, f), xs)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(9) TRUE

(10) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(app(map, f), xs)
APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(f, x)
APP(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(f, x)
APP(app(app(app(filter2, true), f), x), xs) → APP(app(filter, f), xs)
APP(app(app(app(filter2, false), f), x), xs) → APP(app(filter, f), xs)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z) → app(app(:, x), app(app(:, y), z))
app(app(:, app(app(+, x), y)), z) → app(app(+, app(app(:, x), z)), app(app(:, y), z))
app(app(:, z), app(app(+, x), app(f, y))) → app(app(:, app(app(g, z), y)), app(app(+, x), a))
app(app(map, f), nil) → nil
app(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(cons, app(f, x)), app(app(map, f), xs))
app(app(filter, f), nil) → nil
app(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(app(app(filter2, app(f, x)), f), x), xs)
app(app(app(app(filter2, true), f), x), xs) → app(app(cons, x), app(app(filter, f), xs))
app(app(app(app(filter2, false), f), x), xs) → app(app(filter, f), xs)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(11) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(app(map, f), xs)
APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(f, x)
APP(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(f, x)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
APP(x1, x2)  =  APP(x2)
app(x1, x2)  =  app(x1, x2)
map  =  map
cons  =  cons
filter  =  filter
filter2  =  filter2
true  =  true
false  =  false

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
map > [APP1, app2, true, false]
filter > [APP1, app2, true, false]
filter2 > [APP1, app2, true, false]

Status:
APP1: [1]
app2: [2,1]
map: []
cons: []
filter: []
filter2: []
true: []
false: []


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(12) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP(app(app(app(filter2, true), f), x), xs) → APP(app(filter, f), xs)
APP(app(app(app(filter2, false), f), x), xs) → APP(app(filter, f), xs)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z) → app(app(:, x), app(app(:, y), z))
app(app(:, app(app(+, x), y)), z) → app(app(+, app(app(:, x), z)), app(app(:, y), z))
app(app(:, z), app(app(+, x), app(f, y))) → app(app(:, app(app(g, z), y)), app(app(+, x), a))
app(app(map, f), nil) → nil
app(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(cons, app(f, x)), app(app(map, f), xs))
app(app(filter, f), nil) → nil
app(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(app(app(filter2, app(f, x)), f), x), xs)
app(app(app(app(filter2, true), f), x), xs) → app(app(cons, x), app(app(filter, f), xs))
app(app(app(app(filter2, false), f), x), xs) → app(app(filter, f), xs)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(13) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 2 less nodes.

(14) TRUE