Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS
↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)
↳2 QDP
↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
↳4 AND
    ↳5 QDP
        ↳6 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔)
        ↳7 TRUE
    ↳8 QDP
        ↳9 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔)
        ↳10 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, C), x)), y)), z)), u) → app(app(:, app(app(:, x), z)), app(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z)), u))
app(app(map, f), nil) → nil
app(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(cons, app(f, x)), app(app(map, f), xs))
app(app(filter, f), nil) → nil
app(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(app(app(filter2, app(f, x)), f), x), xs)
app(app(app(app(filter2, true), f), x), xs) → app(app(cons, x), app(app(filter, f), xs))
app(app(app(app(filter2, false), f), x), xs) → app(app(filter, f), xs)

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, C), x)), y)), z)), u) → APP(app(:, app(app(:, x), z)), app(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z)), u))
APP(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, C), x)), y)), z)), u) → APP(:, app(app(:, x), z))
APP(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, C), x)), y)), z)), u) → APP(app(:, x), z)
APP(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, C), x)), y)), z)), u) → APP(:, x)
APP(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, C), x)), y)), z)), u) → APP(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z)), u)
APP(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, C), x)), y)), z)), u) → APP(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z))
APP(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, C), x)), y)), z)), u) → APP(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z)
APP(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, C), x)), y)), z)), u) → APP(:, app(app(:, x), y))
APP(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, C), x)), y)), z)), u) → APP(app(:, x), y)
APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(app(cons, app(f, x)), app(app(map, f), xs))
APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(cons, app(f, x))
APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(f, x)
APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(app(map, f), xs)
APP(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(app(app(app(filter2, app(f, x)), f), x), xs)
APP(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(app(app(filter2, app(f, x)), f), x)
APP(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(app(filter2, app(f, x)), f)
APP(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(filter2, app(f, x))
APP(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(f, x)
APP(app(app(app(filter2, true), f), x), xs) → APP(app(cons, x), app(app(filter, f), xs))
APP(app(app(app(filter2, true), f), x), xs) → APP(cons, x)
APP(app(app(app(filter2, true), f), x), xs) → APP(app(filter, f), xs)
APP(app(app(app(filter2, true), f), x), xs) → APP(filter, f)
APP(app(app(app(filter2, false), f), x), xs) → APP(app(filter, f), xs)
APP(app(app(app(filter2, false), f), x), xs) → APP(filter, f)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, C), x)), y)), z)), u) → app(app(:, app(app(:, x), z)), app(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z)), u))
app(app(map, f), nil) → nil
app(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(cons, app(f, x)), app(app(map, f), xs))
app(app(filter, f), nil) → nil
app(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(app(app(filter2, app(f, x)), f), x), xs)
app(app(app(app(filter2, true), f), x), xs) → app(app(cons, x), app(app(filter, f), xs))
app(app(app(app(filter2, false), f), x), xs) → app(app(filter, f), xs)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 2 SCCs with 14 less nodes.

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, C), x)), y)), z)), u) → APP(app(:, x), z)
APP(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, C), x)), y)), z)), u) → APP(app(:, app(app(:, x), z)), app(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z)), u))
APP(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, C), x)), y)), z)), u) → APP(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z)), u)
APP(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, C), x)), y)), z)), u) → APP(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z)
APP(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, C), x)), y)), z)), u) → APP(app(:, x), y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, C), x)), y)), z)), u) → app(app(:, app(app(:, x), z)), app(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z)), u))
app(app(map, f), nil) → nil
app(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(cons, app(f, x)), app(app(map, f), xs))
app(app(filter, f), nil) → nil
app(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(app(app(filter2, app(f, x)), f), x), xs)
app(app(app(app(filter2, true), f), x), xs) → app(app(cons, x), app(app(filter, f), xs))
app(app(app(app(filter2, false), f), x), xs) → app(app(filter, f), xs)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(6) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We used the following order and afs together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] to show that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

Order:Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

: > [app2, C]

Status:
app2: [1,2]
:: multiset
C: multiset

AFS:
app(x1, x2)  =  app(x1, x2)
:  =  :
C  =  C

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • APP(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, C), x)), y)), z)), u) → APP(app(:, x), z) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1, 2})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 1 > 2

  • APP(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, C), x)), y)), z)), u) → APP(app(:, app(app(:, x), z)), app(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z)), u)) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

  • APP(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, C), x)), y)), z)), u) → APP(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z)), u) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1, 2})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2

  • APP(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, C), x)), y)), z)), u) → APP(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1, 2})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 1 > 2

  • APP(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, C), x)), y)), z)), u) → APP(app(:, x), y) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1, 2})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 1 > 2

We oriented the following set of usable rules [AAECC05,FROCOS05].


app(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, C), x)), y)), z)), u) → app(app(:, app(app(:, x), z)), app(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z)), u))

(7) TRUE

(8) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(app(map, f), xs)
APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(f, x)
APP(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(f, x)
APP(app(app(app(filter2, true), f), x), xs) → APP(app(filter, f), xs)
APP(app(app(app(filter2, false), f), x), xs) → APP(app(filter, f), xs)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, C), x)), y)), z)), u) → app(app(:, app(app(:, x), z)), app(app(:, app(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z)), u))
app(app(map, f), nil) → nil
app(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(cons, app(f, x)), app(app(map, f), xs))
app(app(filter, f), nil) → nil
app(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(app(app(filter2, app(f, x)), f), x), xs)
app(app(app(app(filter2, true), f), x), xs) → app(app(cons, x), app(app(filter, f), xs))
app(app(app(app(filter2, false), f), x), xs) → app(app(filter, f), xs)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(9) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We used the following order and afs together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] to show that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

Order:Homeomorphic Embedding Order

AFS:
map  =  map
cons  =  cons
filter  =  filter
filter2  =  filter2
true  =  true
false  =  false
app(x1, x2)  =  app(x1, x2)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • APP(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(f, x) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1, 2})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2

  • APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(f, x) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1, 2})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2

  • APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(app(map, f), xs) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1, 2})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2

  • APP(app(app(app(filter2, true), f), x), xs) → APP(app(filter, f), xs) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1, 2})
    The graph contains the following edges 2 >= 2

  • APP(app(app(app(filter2, false), f), x), xs) → APP(app(filter, f), xs) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1, 2})
    The graph contains the following edges 2 >= 2

We oriented the following set of usable rules [AAECC05,FROCOS05]. none

(10) TRUE