Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmp74JLju/11.xml

Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS

↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)

↳2 QDP

↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

↳4 AND

    ↳5 QDP

        ↳6 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳7 QDP

        ↳8 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳9 QDP

        ↳10 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳11 QDP

        ↳12 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳13 QDP

        ↳14 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳15 QDP

        ↳16 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳17 QDP

        ↳18 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳19 QDP

        ↳20 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

        ↳21 TRUE

    ↳22 QDP

        ↳23 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳24 QDP

        ↳25 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

        ↳26 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(D, t) → 1
app(D, constant) → 0
app(D, app(app(+, x), y)) → app(app(+, app(D, x)), app(D, y))
app(D, app(app(*, x), y)) → app(app(+, app(app(*, y), app(D, x))), app(app(*, x), app(D, y)))
app(D, app(app(-, x), y)) → app(app(-, app(D, x)), app(D, y))
app(D, app(minus, x)) → app(minus, app(D, x))
app(D, app(app(div, x), y)) → app(app(-, app(app(div, app(D, x)), y)), app(app(div, app(app(*, x), app(D, y))), app(app(pow, y), 2)))
app(D, app(ln, x)) → app(app(div, app(D, x)), x)
app(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → app(app(+, app(app(*, app(app(*, y), app(app(pow, x), app(app(-, y), 1)))), app(D, x))), app(app(*, app(app(*, app(app(pow, x), y)), app(ln, x))), app(D, y)))
app(app(map, f), nil) → nil
app(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(cons, app(f, x)), app(app(map, f), xs))
app(app(filter, f), nil) → nil
app(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(app(app(filter2, app(f, x)), f), x), xs)
app(app(app(app(filter2, true), f), x), xs) → app(app(cons, x), app(app(filter, f), xs))
app(app(app(app(filter2, false), f), x), xs) → app(app(filter, f), xs)

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP(D, app(app(+, x), y)) → APP(app(+, app(D, x)), app(D, y))
APP(D, app(app(+, x), y)) → APP(+, app(D, x))
APP(D, app(app(+, x), y)) → APP(D, x)
APP(D, app(app(+, x), y)) → APP(D, y)
APP(D, app(app(*, x), y)) → APP(app(+, app(app(*, y), app(D, x))), app(app(*, x), app(D, y)))
APP(D, app(app(*, x), y)) → APP(+, app(app(*, y), app(D, x)))
APP(D, app(app(*, x), y)) → APP(app(*, y), app(D, x))
APP(D, app(app(*, x), y)) → APP(*, y)
APP(D, app(app(*, x), y)) → APP(D, x)
APP(D, app(app(*, x), y)) → APP(app(*, x), app(D, y))
APP(D, app(app(*, x), y)) → APP(D, y)
APP(D, app(app(-, x), y)) → APP(app(-, app(D, x)), app(D, y))
APP(D, app(app(-, x), y)) → APP(-, app(D, x))
APP(D, app(app(-, x), y)) → APP(D, x)
APP(D, app(app(-, x), y)) → APP(D, y)
APP(D, app(minus, x)) → APP(minus, app(D, x))
APP(D, app(minus, x)) → APP(D, x)
APP(D, app(app(div, x), y)) → APP(app(-, app(app(div, app(D, x)), y)), app(app(div, app(app(*, x), app(D, y))), app(app(pow, y), 2)))
APP(D, app(app(div, x), y)) → APP(-, app(app(div, app(D, x)), y))
APP(D, app(app(div, x), y)) → APP(app(div, app(D, x)), y)
APP(D, app(app(div, x), y)) → APP(div, app(D, x))
APP(D, app(app(div, x), y)) → APP(D, x)
APP(D, app(app(div, x), y)) → APP(app(div, app(app(*, x), app(D, y))), app(app(pow, y), 2))
APP(D, app(app(div, x), y)) → APP(div, app(app(*, x), app(D, y)))
APP(D, app(app(div, x), y)) → APP(app(*, x), app(D, y))
APP(D, app(app(div, x), y)) → APP(*, x)
APP(D, app(app(div, x), y)) → APP(D, y)
APP(D, app(app(div, x), y)) → APP(app(pow, y), 2)
APP(D, app(app(div, x), y)) → APP(pow, y)
APP(D, app(ln, x)) → APP(app(div, app(D, x)), x)
APP(D, app(ln, x)) → APP(div, app(D, x))
APP(D, app(ln, x)) → APP(D, x)
APP(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → APP(app(+, app(app(*, app(app(*, y), app(app(pow, x), app(app(-, y), 1)))), app(D, x))), app(app(*, app(app(*, app(app(pow, x), y)), app(ln, x))), app(D, y)))
APP(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → APP(+, app(app(*, app(app(*, y), app(app(pow, x), app(app(-, y), 1)))), app(D, x)))
APP(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → APP(app(*, app(app(*, y), app(app(pow, x), app(app(-, y), 1)))), app(D, x))
APP(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → APP(*, app(app(*, y), app(app(pow, x), app(app(-, y), 1))))
APP(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → APP(app(*, y), app(app(pow, x), app(app(-, y), 1)))
APP(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → APP(*, y)
APP(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → APP(app(pow, x), app(app(-, y), 1))
APP(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → APP(app(-, y), 1)
APP(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → APP(-, y)
APP(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → APP(D, x)
APP(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → APP(app(*, app(app(*, app(app(pow, x), y)), app(ln, x))), app(D, y))
APP(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → APP(*, app(app(*, app(app(pow, x), y)), app(ln, x)))
APP(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → APP(app(*, app(app(pow, x), y)), app(ln, x))
APP(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → APP(*, app(app(pow, x), y))
APP(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → APP(ln, x)
APP(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → APP(D, y)
APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(app(cons, app(f, x)), app(app(map, f), xs))
APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(cons, app(f, x))
APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(f, x)
APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(app(map, f), xs)
APP(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(app(app(app(filter2, app(f, x)), f), x), xs)
APP(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(app(app(filter2, app(f, x)), f), x)
APP(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(app(filter2, app(f, x)), f)
APP(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(filter2, app(f, x))
APP(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(f, x)
APP(app(app(app(filter2, true), f), x), xs) → APP(app(cons, x), app(app(filter, f), xs))
APP(app(app(app(filter2, true), f), x), xs) → APP(cons, x)
APP(app(app(app(filter2, true), f), x), xs) → APP(app(filter, f), xs)
APP(app(app(app(filter2, true), f), x), xs) → APP(filter, f)
APP(app(app(app(filter2, false), f), x), xs) → APP(app(filter, f), xs)
APP(app(app(app(filter2, false), f), x), xs) → APP(filter, f)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(D, t) → 1
app(D, constant) → 0
app(D, app(app(+, x), y)) → app(app(+, app(D, x)), app(D, y))
app(D, app(app(*, x), y)) → app(app(+, app(app(*, y), app(D, x))), app(app(*, x), app(D, y)))
app(D, app(app(-, x), y)) → app(app(-, app(D, x)), app(D, y))
app(D, app(minus, x)) → app(minus, app(D, x))
app(D, app(app(div, x), y)) → app(app(-, app(app(div, app(D, x)), y)), app(app(div, app(app(*, x), app(D, y))), app(app(pow, y), 2)))
app(D, app(ln, x)) → app(app(div, app(D, x)), x)
app(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → app(app(+, app(app(*, app(app(*, y), app(app(pow, x), app(app(-, y), 1)))), app(D, x))), app(app(*, app(app(*, app(app(pow, x), y)), app(ln, x))), app(D, y)))
app(app(map, f), nil) → nil
app(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(cons, app(f, x)), app(app(map, f), xs))
app(app(filter, f), nil) → nil
app(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(app(app(filter2, app(f, x)), f), x), xs)
app(app(app(app(filter2, true), f), x), xs) → app(app(cons, x), app(app(filter, f), xs))
app(app(app(app(filter2, false), f), x), xs) → app(app(filter, f), xs)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 2 SCCs with 46 less nodes.

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP(D, app(app(+, x), y)) → APP(D, y)
APP(D, app(app(+, x), y)) → APP(D, x)
APP(D, app(app(*, x), y)) → APP(D, x)
APP(D, app(app(*, x), y)) → APP(D, y)
APP(D, app(app(-, x), y)) → APP(D, x)
APP(D, app(app(-, x), y)) → APP(D, y)
APP(D, app(minus, x)) → APP(D, x)
APP(D, app(app(div, x), y)) → APP(D, x)
APP(D, app(app(div, x), y)) → APP(D, y)
APP(D, app(ln, x)) → APP(D, x)
APP(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → APP(D, x)
APP(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → APP(D, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(D, t) → 1
app(D, constant) → 0
app(D, app(app(+, x), y)) → app(app(+, app(D, x)), app(D, y))
app(D, app(app(*, x), y)) → app(app(+, app(app(*, y), app(D, x))), app(app(*, x), app(D, y)))
app(D, app(app(-, x), y)) → app(app(-, app(D, x)), app(D, y))
app(D, app(minus, x)) → app(minus, app(D, x))
app(D, app(app(div, x), y)) → app(app(-, app(app(div, app(D, x)), y)), app(app(div, app(app(*, x), app(D, y))), app(app(pow, y), 2)))
app(D, app(ln, x)) → app(app(div, app(D, x)), x)
app(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → app(app(+, app(app(*, app(app(*, y), app(app(pow, x), app(app(-, y), 1)))), app(D, x))), app(app(*, app(app(*, app(app(pow, x), y)), app(ln, x))), app(D, y)))
app(app(map, f), nil) → nil
app(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(cons, app(f, x)), app(app(map, f), xs))
app(app(filter, f), nil) → nil
app(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(app(app(filter2, app(f, x)), f), x), xs)
app(app(app(app(filter2, true), f), x), xs) → app(app(cons, x), app(app(filter, f), xs))
app(app(app(app(filter2, false), f), x), xs) → app(app(filter, f), xs)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

APP(D, app(app(div, x), y)) → APP(D, x)
APP(D, app(app(div, x), y)) → APP(D, y)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
APP(x1, x2) = APP(x1, x2)

Tags:
APP has tags [1,0]

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

div > D

Status:

D: []
app₂: [1,2]
+: []
*: []
-: []
minus: []
div: []
ln: []
pow: []

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP(D, app(app(+, x), y)) → APP(D, y)
APP(D, app(app(+, x), y)) → APP(D, x)
APP(D, app(app(*, x), y)) → APP(D, x)
APP(D, app(app(*, x), y)) → APP(D, y)
APP(D, app(app(-, x), y)) → APP(D, x)
APP(D, app(app(-, x), y)) → APP(D, y)
APP(D, app(minus, x)) → APP(D, x)
APP(D, app(ln, x)) → APP(D, x)
APP(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → APP(D, x)
APP(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → APP(D, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(D, t) → 1
app(D, constant) → 0
app(D, app(app(+, x), y)) → app(app(+, app(D, x)), app(D, y))
app(D, app(app(*, x), y)) → app(app(+, app(app(*, y), app(D, x))), app(app(*, x), app(D, y)))
app(D, app(app(-, x), y)) → app(app(-, app(D, x)), app(D, y))
app(D, app(minus, x)) → app(minus, app(D, x))
app(D, app(app(div, x), y)) → app(app(-, app(app(div, app(D, x)), y)), app(app(div, app(app(*, x), app(D, y))), app(app(pow, y), 2)))
app(D, app(ln, x)) → app(app(div, app(D, x)), x)
app(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → app(app(+, app(app(*, app(app(*, y), app(app(pow, x), app(app(-, y), 1)))), app(D, x))), app(app(*, app(app(*, app(app(pow, x), y)), app(ln, x))), app(D, y)))
app(app(map, f), nil) → nil
app(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(cons, app(f, x)), app(app(map, f), xs))
app(app(filter, f), nil) → nil
app(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(app(app(filter2, app(f, x)), f), x), xs)
app(app(app(app(filter2, true), f), x), xs) → app(app(cons, x), app(app(filter, f), xs))
app(app(app(app(filter2, false), f), x), xs) → app(app(filter, f), xs)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

APP(D, app(app(*, x), y)) → APP(D, x)
APP(D, app(app(*, x), y)) → APP(D, y)

* > D

Status:

D: []
app₂: [1,2]
+: []
*: []
-: []
minus: []
ln: []
pow: []

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(9) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP(D, app(app(+, x), y)) → APP(D, y)
APP(D, app(app(+, x), y)) → APP(D, x)
APP(D, app(app(-, x), y)) → APP(D, x)
APP(D, app(app(-, x), y)) → APP(D, y)
APP(D, app(minus, x)) → APP(D, x)
APP(D, app(ln, x)) → APP(D, x)
APP(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → APP(D, x)
APP(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → APP(D, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(D, t) → 1
app(D, constant) → 0
app(D, app(app(+, x), y)) → app(app(+, app(D, x)), app(D, y))
app(D, app(app(*, x), y)) → app(app(+, app(app(*, y), app(D, x))), app(app(*, x), app(D, y)))
app(D, app(app(-, x), y)) → app(app(-, app(D, x)), app(D, y))
app(D, app(minus, x)) → app(minus, app(D, x))
app(D, app(app(div, x), y)) → app(app(-, app(app(div, app(D, x)), y)), app(app(div, app(app(*, x), app(D, y))), app(app(pow, y), 2)))
app(D, app(ln, x)) → app(app(div, app(D, x)), x)
app(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → app(app(+, app(app(*, app(app(*, y), app(app(pow, x), app(app(-, y), 1)))), app(D, x))), app(app(*, app(app(*, app(app(pow, x), y)), app(ln, x))), app(D, y)))
app(app(map, f), nil) → nil
app(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(cons, app(f, x)), app(app(map, f), xs))
app(app(filter, f), nil) → nil
app(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(app(app(filter2, app(f, x)), f), x), xs)
app(app(app(app(filter2, true), f), x), xs) → app(app(cons, x), app(app(filter, f), xs))
app(app(app(app(filter2, false), f), x), xs) → app(app(filter, f), xs)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(10) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

APP(D, app(app(-, x), y)) → APP(D, x)
APP(D, app(app(-, x), y)) → APP(D, y)

[D, -]

Status:

D: []
app₂: [2,1]
+: []
-: []
minus: []
ln: []
pow: []

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(11) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP(D, app(app(+, x), y)) → APP(D, y)
APP(D, app(app(+, x), y)) → APP(D, x)
APP(D, app(minus, x)) → APP(D, x)
APP(D, app(ln, x)) → APP(D, x)
APP(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → APP(D, x)
APP(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → APP(D, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(D, t) → 1
app(D, constant) → 0
app(D, app(app(+, x), y)) → app(app(+, app(D, x)), app(D, y))
app(D, app(app(*, x), y)) → app(app(+, app(app(*, y), app(D, x))), app(app(*, x), app(D, y)))
app(D, app(app(-, x), y)) → app(app(-, app(D, x)), app(D, y))
app(D, app(minus, x)) → app(minus, app(D, x))
app(D, app(app(div, x), y)) → app(app(-, app(app(div, app(D, x)), y)), app(app(div, app(app(*, x), app(D, y))), app(app(pow, y), 2)))
app(D, app(ln, x)) → app(app(div, app(D, x)), x)
app(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → app(app(+, app(app(*, app(app(*, y), app(app(pow, x), app(app(-, y), 1)))), app(D, x))), app(app(*, app(app(*, app(app(pow, x), y)), app(ln, x))), app(D, y)))
app(app(map, f), nil) → nil
app(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(cons, app(f, x)), app(app(map, f), xs))
app(app(filter, f), nil) → nil
app(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(app(app(filter2, app(f, x)), f), x), xs)
app(app(app(app(filter2, true), f), x), xs) → app(app(cons, x), app(app(filter, f), xs))
app(app(app(app(filter2, false), f), x), xs) → app(app(filter, f), xs)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(12) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

APP(D, app(minus, x)) → APP(D, x)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
APP(x1, x2) = APP(x1, x2)

Tags:
APP has tags [0,0]

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[D, minus]

Status:

D: []
app₂: [2,1]
+: []
minus: []
ln: []
pow: []

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(13) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP(D, app(app(+, x), y)) → APP(D, y)
APP(D, app(app(+, x), y)) → APP(D, x)
APP(D, app(ln, x)) → APP(D, x)
APP(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → APP(D, x)
APP(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → APP(D, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(D, t) → 1
app(D, constant) → 0
app(D, app(app(+, x), y)) → app(app(+, app(D, x)), app(D, y))
app(D, app(app(*, x), y)) → app(app(+, app(app(*, y), app(D, x))), app(app(*, x), app(D, y)))
app(D, app(app(-, x), y)) → app(app(-, app(D, x)), app(D, y))
app(D, app(minus, x)) → app(minus, app(D, x))
app(D, app(app(div, x), y)) → app(app(-, app(app(div, app(D, x)), y)), app(app(div, app(app(*, x), app(D, y))), app(app(pow, y), 2)))
app(D, app(ln, x)) → app(app(div, app(D, x)), x)
app(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → app(app(+, app(app(*, app(app(*, y), app(app(pow, x), app(app(-, y), 1)))), app(D, x))), app(app(*, app(app(*, app(app(pow, x), y)), app(ln, x))), app(D, y)))
app(app(map, f), nil) → nil
app(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(cons, app(f, x)), app(app(map, f), xs))
app(app(filter, f), nil) → nil
app(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(app(app(filter2, app(f, x)), f), x), xs)
app(app(app(app(filter2, true), f), x), xs) → app(app(cons, x), app(app(filter, f), xs))
app(app(app(app(filter2, false), f), x), xs) → app(app(filter, f), xs)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(14) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

APP(D, app(app(+, x), y)) → APP(D, y)
APP(D, app(app(+, x), y)) → APP(D, x)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
APP(x1, x2) = APP(x1, x2)

Tags:
APP has tags [1,1]

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[D, +]

Status:

D: []
app₂: [1,2]
+: []
ln: []
pow: []

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(15) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP(D, app(ln, x)) → APP(D, x)
APP(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → APP(D, x)
APP(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → APP(D, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(D, t) → 1
app(D, constant) → 0
app(D, app(app(+, x), y)) → app(app(+, app(D, x)), app(D, y))
app(D, app(app(*, x), y)) → app(app(+, app(app(*, y), app(D, x))), app(app(*, x), app(D, y)))
app(D, app(app(-, x), y)) → app(app(-, app(D, x)), app(D, y))
app(D, app(minus, x)) → app(minus, app(D, x))
app(D, app(app(div, x), y)) → app(app(-, app(app(div, app(D, x)), y)), app(app(div, app(app(*, x), app(D, y))), app(app(pow, y), 2)))
app(D, app(ln, x)) → app(app(div, app(D, x)), x)
app(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → app(app(+, app(app(*, app(app(*, y), app(app(pow, x), app(app(-, y), 1)))), app(D, x))), app(app(*, app(app(*, app(app(pow, x), y)), app(ln, x))), app(D, y)))
app(app(map, f), nil) → nil
app(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(cons, app(f, x)), app(app(map, f), xs))
app(app(filter, f), nil) → nil
app(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(app(app(filter2, app(f, x)), f), x), xs)
app(app(app(app(filter2, true), f), x), xs) → app(app(cons, x), app(app(filter, f), xs))
app(app(app(app(filter2, false), f), x), xs) → app(app(filter, f), xs)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(16) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

APP(D, app(ln, x)) → APP(D, x)

ln > D

Status:

D: []
app₂: [1,2]
ln: []
pow: []

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(17) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → APP(D, x)
APP(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → APP(D, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(D, t) → 1
app(D, constant) → 0
app(D, app(app(+, x), y)) → app(app(+, app(D, x)), app(D, y))
app(D, app(app(*, x), y)) → app(app(+, app(app(*, y), app(D, x))), app(app(*, x), app(D, y)))
app(D, app(app(-, x), y)) → app(app(-, app(D, x)), app(D, y))
app(D, app(minus, x)) → app(minus, app(D, x))
app(D, app(app(div, x), y)) → app(app(-, app(app(div, app(D, x)), y)), app(app(div, app(app(*, x), app(D, y))), app(app(pow, y), 2)))
app(D, app(ln, x)) → app(app(div, app(D, x)), x)
app(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → app(app(+, app(app(*, app(app(*, y), app(app(pow, x), app(app(-, y), 1)))), app(D, x))), app(app(*, app(app(*, app(app(pow, x), y)), app(ln, x))), app(D, y)))
app(app(map, f), nil) → nil
app(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(cons, app(f, x)), app(app(map, f), xs))
app(app(filter, f), nil) → nil
app(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(app(app(filter2, app(f, x)), f), x), xs)
app(app(app(app(filter2, true), f), x), xs) → app(app(cons, x), app(app(filter, f), xs))
app(app(app(app(filter2, false), f), x), xs) → app(app(filter, f), xs)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(18) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

APP(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → APP(D, x)
APP(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → APP(D, y)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
APP(x1, x2) = APP(x1, x2)

Tags:
APP has tags [1,1]

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

app₂ > [D, pow]

Status:

D: []
app₂: [2,1]
pow: []

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(19) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(D, t) → 1
app(D, constant) → 0
app(D, app(app(+, x), y)) → app(app(+, app(D, x)), app(D, y))
app(D, app(app(*, x), y)) → app(app(+, app(app(*, y), app(D, x))), app(app(*, x), app(D, y)))
app(D, app(app(-, x), y)) → app(app(-, app(D, x)), app(D, y))
app(D, app(minus, x)) → app(minus, app(D, x))
app(D, app(app(div, x), y)) → app(app(-, app(app(div, app(D, x)), y)), app(app(div, app(app(*, x), app(D, y))), app(app(pow, y), 2)))
app(D, app(ln, x)) → app(app(div, app(D, x)), x)
app(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → app(app(+, app(app(*, app(app(*, y), app(app(pow, x), app(app(-, y), 1)))), app(D, x))), app(app(*, app(app(*, app(app(pow, x), y)), app(ln, x))), app(D, y)))
app(app(map, f), nil) → nil
app(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(cons, app(f, x)), app(app(map, f), xs))
app(app(filter, f), nil) → nil
app(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(app(app(filter2, app(f, x)), f), x), xs)
app(app(app(app(filter2, true), f), x), xs) → app(app(cons, x), app(app(filter, f), xs))
app(app(app(app(filter2, false), f), x), xs) → app(app(filter, f), xs)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(20) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(21) TRUE

(22) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(app(map, f), xs)
APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(f, x)
APP(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(f, x)
APP(app(app(app(filter2, true), f), x), xs) → APP(app(filter, f), xs)
APP(app(app(app(filter2, false), f), x), xs) → APP(app(filter, f), xs)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(D, t) → 1
app(D, constant) → 0
app(D, app(app(+, x), y)) → app(app(+, app(D, x)), app(D, y))
app(D, app(app(*, x), y)) → app(app(+, app(app(*, y), app(D, x))), app(app(*, x), app(D, y)))
app(D, app(app(-, x), y)) → app(app(-, app(D, x)), app(D, y))
app(D, app(minus, x)) → app(minus, app(D, x))
app(D, app(app(div, x), y)) → app(app(-, app(app(div, app(D, x)), y)), app(app(div, app(app(*, x), app(D, y))), app(app(pow, y), 2)))
app(D, app(ln, x)) → app(app(div, app(D, x)), x)
app(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → app(app(+, app(app(*, app(app(*, y), app(app(pow, x), app(app(-, y), 1)))), app(D, x))), app(app(*, app(app(*, app(app(pow, x), y)), app(ln, x))), app(D, y)))
app(app(map, f), nil) → nil
app(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(cons, app(f, x)), app(app(map, f), xs))
app(app(filter, f), nil) → nil
app(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(app(app(filter2, app(f, x)), f), x), xs)
app(app(app(app(filter2, true), f), x), xs) → app(app(cons, x), app(app(filter, f), xs))
app(app(app(app(filter2, false), f), x), xs) → app(app(filter, f), xs)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(23) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(app(map, f), xs)
APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(f, x)
APP(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(f, x)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
APP(x1, x2) = APP(x2)

Tags:
APP has tags [1,1]

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[app₂, cons, filter2, false]

Status:

app₂: [1,2]
map: []
cons: []
filter: []
filter2: []
true: []
false: []

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(24) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP(app(app(app(filter2, true), f), x), xs) → APP(app(filter, f), xs)
APP(app(app(app(filter2, false), f), x), xs) → APP(app(filter, f), xs)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(D, t) → 1
app(D, constant) → 0
app(D, app(app(+, x), y)) → app(app(+, app(D, x)), app(D, y))
app(D, app(app(*, x), y)) → app(app(+, app(app(*, y), app(D, x))), app(app(*, x), app(D, y)))
app(D, app(app(-, x), y)) → app(app(-, app(D, x)), app(D, y))
app(D, app(minus, x)) → app(minus, app(D, x))
app(D, app(app(div, x), y)) → app(app(-, app(app(div, app(D, x)), y)), app(app(div, app(app(*, x), app(D, y))), app(app(pow, y), 2)))
app(D, app(ln, x)) → app(app(div, app(D, x)), x)
app(D, app(app(pow, x), y)) → app(app(+, app(app(*, app(app(*, y), app(app(pow, x), app(app(-, y), 1)))), app(D, x))), app(app(*, app(app(*, app(app(pow, x), y)), app(ln, x))), app(D, y)))
app(app(map, f), nil) → nil
app(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(cons, app(f, x)), app(app(map, f), xs))
app(app(filter, f), nil) → nil
app(app(filter, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(app(app(filter2, app(f, x)), f), x), xs)
app(app(app(app(filter2, true), f), x), xs) → app(app(cons, x), app(app(filter, f), xs))
app(app(app(app(filter2, false), f), x), xs) → app(app(filter, f), xs)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(25) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 2 less nodes.

(0) Obligation:

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(2) Obligation:

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(7) Obligation:

(8) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(9) Obligation:

(10) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(11) Obligation:

(12) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(13) Obligation:

(14) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(15) Obligation:

(16) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(17) Obligation:

(18) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(19) Obligation:

(20) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(21) TRUE

(22) Obligation:

(23) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(24) Obligation:

(25) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(26) TRUE