Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS
↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)
↳2 QDP
↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
↳4 AND
    ↳5 QDP
        ↳6 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔)
        ↳7 TRUE
    ↳8 QDP
        ↳9 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔)
        ↳10 TRUE
    ↳11 QDP
        ↳12 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔)
        ↳13 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(app(map, f), nil) → nil
app(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(cons, app(f, x)), app(app(map, f), xs))
app(app(le, 0), y) → true
app(app(le, app(s, x)), 0) → false
app(app(le, app(s, x)), app(s, y)) → app(app(le, x), y)
app(app(maxlist, x), app(app(cons, y), ys)) → app(app(if, app(app(le, x), y)), app(app(maxlist, y), ys))
app(app(maxlist, x), nil) → x
app(height, app(app(node, x), xs)) → app(s, app(app(maxlist, 0), app(app(map, height), xs)))

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(app(cons, app(f, x)), app(app(map, f), xs))
APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(cons, app(f, x))
APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(f, x)
APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(app(map, f), xs)
APP(app(le, app(s, x)), app(s, y)) → APP(app(le, x), y)
APP(app(le, app(s, x)), app(s, y)) → APP(le, x)
APP(app(maxlist, x), app(app(cons, y), ys)) → APP(app(if, app(app(le, x), y)), app(app(maxlist, y), ys))
APP(app(maxlist, x), app(app(cons, y), ys)) → APP(if, app(app(le, x), y))
APP(app(maxlist, x), app(app(cons, y), ys)) → APP(app(le, x), y)
APP(app(maxlist, x), app(app(cons, y), ys)) → APP(le, x)
APP(app(maxlist, x), app(app(cons, y), ys)) → APP(app(maxlist, y), ys)
APP(app(maxlist, x), app(app(cons, y), ys)) → APP(maxlist, y)
APP(height, app(app(node, x), xs)) → APP(s, app(app(maxlist, 0), app(app(map, height), xs)))
APP(height, app(app(node, x), xs)) → APP(app(maxlist, 0), app(app(map, height), xs))
APP(height, app(app(node, x), xs)) → APP(maxlist, 0)
APP(height, app(app(node, x), xs)) → APP(app(map, height), xs)
APP(height, app(app(node, x), xs)) → APP(map, height)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(app(map, f), nil) → nil
app(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(cons, app(f, x)), app(app(map, f), xs))
app(app(le, 0), y) → true
app(app(le, app(s, x)), 0) → false
app(app(le, app(s, x)), app(s, y)) → app(app(le, x), y)
app(app(maxlist, x), app(app(cons, y), ys)) → app(app(if, app(app(le, x), y)), app(app(maxlist, y), ys))
app(app(maxlist, x), nil) → x
app(height, app(app(node, x), xs)) → app(s, app(app(maxlist, 0), app(app(map, height), xs)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 3 SCCs with 12 less nodes.

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP(app(le, app(s, x)), app(s, y)) → APP(app(le, x), y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(app(map, f), nil) → nil
app(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(cons, app(f, x)), app(app(map, f), xs))
app(app(le, 0), y) → true
app(app(le, app(s, x)), 0) → false
app(app(le, app(s, x)), app(s, y)) → app(app(le, x), y)
app(app(maxlist, x), app(app(cons, y), ys)) → app(app(if, app(app(le, x), y)), app(app(maxlist, y), ys))
app(app(maxlist, x), nil) → x
app(height, app(app(node, x), xs)) → app(s, app(app(maxlist, 0), app(app(map, height), xs)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(6) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We used the following order and afs together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] to show that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

Order:Homeomorphic Embedding Order

AFS:
le  =  le
s  =  s
app(x1, x2)  =  app(x2)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • APP(app(le, app(s, x)), app(s, y)) → APP(app(le, x), y) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1, 2})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2

We oriented the following set of usable rules [AAECC05,FROCOS05]. none

(7) TRUE

(8) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP(app(maxlist, x), app(app(cons, y), ys)) → APP(app(maxlist, y), ys)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(app(map, f), nil) → nil
app(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(cons, app(f, x)), app(app(map, f), xs))
app(app(le, 0), y) → true
app(app(le, app(s, x)), 0) → false
app(app(le, app(s, x)), app(s, y)) → app(app(le, x), y)
app(app(maxlist, x), app(app(cons, y), ys)) → app(app(if, app(app(le, x), y)), app(app(maxlist, y), ys))
app(app(maxlist, x), nil) → x
app(height, app(app(node, x), xs)) → app(s, app(app(maxlist, 0), app(app(map, height), xs)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(9) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We used the following order and afs together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] to show that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

Order:Homeomorphic Embedding Order

AFS:
maxlist  =  maxlist
cons  =  cons
app(x1, x2)  =  app(x2)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • APP(app(maxlist, x), app(app(cons, y), ys)) → APP(app(maxlist, y), ys) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1, 2})
    The graph contains the following edges 2 > 2

We oriented the following set of usable rules [AAECC05,FROCOS05]. none

(10) TRUE

(11) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(app(map, f), xs)
APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(f, x)
APP(height, app(app(node, x), xs)) → APP(app(map, height), xs)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(app(map, f), nil) → nil
app(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(cons, app(f, x)), app(app(map, f), xs))
app(app(le, 0), y) → true
app(app(le, app(s, x)), 0) → false
app(app(le, app(s, x)), app(s, y)) → app(app(le, x), y)
app(app(maxlist, x), app(app(cons, y), ys)) → app(app(if, app(app(le, x), y)), app(app(maxlist, y), ys))
app(app(maxlist, x), nil) → x
app(height, app(app(node, x), xs)) → app(s, app(app(maxlist, 0), app(app(map, height), xs)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(12) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We used the following order and afs together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] to show that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

Order:Homeomorphic Embedding Order

AFS:
map  =  map
cons  =  cons
height  =  height
node  =  node
app(x1, x2)  =  app(x1, x2)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • APP(height, app(app(node, x), xs)) → APP(app(map, height), xs) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1, 2})
    The graph contains the following edges 2 > 2

  • APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(f, x) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1, 2})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2

  • APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(app(map, f), xs) (allowed arguments on rhs = {1, 2})
    The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2

We oriented the following set of usable rules [AAECC05,FROCOS05]. none

(13) TRUE