Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(app(mapt, f), app(leaf, x)) → app(leaf, app(f, x))
app(app(mapt, f), app(node, xs)) → app(node, app(app(maptlist, f), xs))
app(app(maptlist, f), nil) → nil
app(app(maptlist, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(cons, app(app(mapt, f), x)), app(app(maptlist, f), xs))

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP(app(mapt, f), app(leaf, x)) → APP(leaf, app(f, x))
APP(app(mapt, f), app(leaf, x)) → APP(f, x)
APP(app(mapt, f), app(node, xs)) → APP(node, app(app(maptlist, f), xs))
APP(app(mapt, f), app(node, xs)) → APP(app(maptlist, f), xs)
APP(app(mapt, f), app(node, xs)) → APP(maptlist, f)
APP(app(maptlist, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(app(cons, app(app(mapt, f), x)), app(app(maptlist, f), xs))
APP(app(maptlist, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(cons, app(app(mapt, f), x))
APP(app(maptlist, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(app(mapt, f), x)
APP(app(maptlist, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(mapt, f)
APP(app(maptlist, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(app(maptlist, f), xs)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(app(mapt, f), app(leaf, x)) → app(leaf, app(f, x))
app(app(mapt, f), app(node, xs)) → app(node, app(app(maptlist, f), xs))
app(app(maptlist, f), nil) → nil
app(app(maptlist, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(cons, app(app(mapt, f), x)), app(app(maptlist, f), xs))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 6 less nodes.

(4) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP(app(mapt, f), app(node, xs)) → APP(app(maptlist, f), xs)
APP(app(maptlist, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(app(mapt, f), x)
APP(app(mapt, f), app(leaf, x)) → APP(f, x)
APP(app(maptlist, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(app(maptlist, f), xs)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(app(mapt, f), app(leaf, x)) → app(leaf, app(f, x))
app(app(mapt, f), app(node, xs)) → app(node, app(app(maptlist, f), xs))
app(app(maptlist, f), nil) → nil
app(app(maptlist, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(cons, app(app(mapt, f), x)), app(app(maptlist, f), xs))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

APP(app(mapt, f), app(leaf, x)) → APP(f, x)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
APP(x0, x1, x2)  =  APP(x0, x1)

Tags:
APP has argument tags [3,1,0] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
APP(x1, x2)  =  x2
app(x1, x2)  =  app(x1, x2)
mapt  =  mapt
node  =  node
maptlist  =  maptlist
cons  =  cons
leaf  =  leaf

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

node > [app₂, cons] > [mapt, maptlist]

Status:

app₂: [2,1]
mapt: []
node: []
maptlist: []
cons: []
leaf: []

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(6) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP(app(mapt, f), app(node, xs)) → APP(app(maptlist, f), xs)
APP(app(maptlist, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(app(mapt, f), x)
APP(app(maptlist, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(app(maptlist, f), xs)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(app(mapt, f), app(leaf, x)) → app(leaf, app(f, x))
app(app(mapt, f), app(node, xs)) → app(node, app(app(maptlist, f), xs))
app(app(maptlist, f), nil) → nil
app(app(maptlist, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(cons, app(app(mapt, f), x)), app(app(maptlist, f), xs))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(7) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

APP(app(maptlist, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(app(mapt, f), x)
APP(app(maptlist, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → APP(app(maptlist, f), xs)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
APP(x0, x1, x2)  =  APP(x0, x2)

Tags:
APP has argument tags [1,1,0] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
APP(x1, x2)  =  APP
app(x1, x2)  =  app(x1, x2)
mapt  =  mapt
node  =  node
maptlist  =  maptlist
cons  =  cons

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[APP, cons] > mapt > app₂ > maptlist
node > app₂ > maptlist

Status:

APP: []
app₂: [1,2]
mapt: []
node: []
maptlist: []
cons: []

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(8) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP(app(mapt, f), app(node, xs)) → APP(app(maptlist, f), xs)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(app(mapt, f), app(leaf, x)) → app(leaf, app(f, x))
app(app(mapt, f), app(node, xs)) → app(node, app(app(maptlist, f), xs))
app(app(maptlist, f), nil) → nil
app(app(maptlist, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) → app(app(cons, app(app(mapt, f), x)), app(app(maptlist, f), xs))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(9) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node.

(10) TRUE