(0) Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
ack(0, y) → s(y)
ack(s(x), 0) → ack(x, s(0))
ack(s(x), s(y)) → ack(x, ack(s(x), y))
f(s(x), y) → f(x, s(x))
f(x, s(y)) → f(y, x)
f(x, y) → ack(x, y)
ack(s(x), y) → f(x, x)
Q is empty.
(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.
(2) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
ACK(s(x), 0) → ACK(x, s(0))
ACK(s(x), s(y)) → ACK(x, ack(s(x), y))
ACK(s(x), s(y)) → ACK(s(x), y)
F(s(x), y) → F(x, s(x))
F(x, s(y)) → F(y, x)
F(x, y) → ACK(x, y)
ACK(s(x), y) → F(x, x)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
ack(0, y) → s(y)
ack(s(x), 0) → ack(x, s(0))
ack(s(x), s(y)) → ack(x, ack(s(x), y))
f(s(x), y) → f(x, s(x))
f(x, s(y)) → f(y, x)
f(x, y) → ack(x, y)
ack(s(x), y) → f(x, x)
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(3) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].
The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
ACK(s(x), 0) → ACK(x, s(0))
ACK(s(x), s(y)) → ACK(x, ack(s(x), y))
F(s(x), y) → F(x, s(x))
F(x, s(y)) → F(y, x)
F(x, y) → ACK(x, y)
ACK(s(x), y) → F(x, x)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
ACK(
x0,
x1,
x2) =
ACK(
x0)
F(
x0,
x1,
x2) =
F(
x0,
x1,
x2)
Tags:
ACK has argument tags [3,0,1] and root tag 1
F has argument tags [3,7,4] and root tag 0
Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
ACK(
x1,
x2) =
x1
s(
x1) =
s(
x1)
0 =
0
ack(
x1,
x2) =
ack
F(
x1,
x2) =
x2
f(
x1,
x2) =
x1
Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[0, ack] > s1
Status:
s1: multiset
0: multiset
ack: multiset
The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:
none
(4) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
ACK(s(x), s(y)) → ACK(s(x), y)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
ack(0, y) → s(y)
ack(s(x), 0) → ack(x, s(0))
ack(s(x), s(y)) → ack(x, ack(s(x), y))
f(s(x), y) → f(x, s(x))
f(x, s(y)) → f(y, x)
f(x, y) → ack(x, y)
ack(s(x), y) → f(x, x)
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].
The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
ACK(s(x), s(y)) → ACK(s(x), y)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
ACK(
x0,
x1,
x2) =
ACK(
x0,
x1)
Tags:
ACK has argument tags [1,2,0] and root tag 0
Comparison: DMS
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
ACK(
x1,
x2) =
x2
s(
x1) =
s(
x1)
Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial
Status:
s1: multiset
The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:
none
(6) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
ack(0, y) → s(y)
ack(s(x), 0) → ack(x, s(0))
ack(s(x), s(y)) → ack(x, ack(s(x), y))
f(s(x), y) → f(x, s(x))
f(x, s(y)) → f(y, x)
f(x, y) → ack(x, y)
ack(s(x), y) → f(x, x)
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(7) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.
(8) TRUE