(0) Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
g(x, y) → x
g(x, y) → y
f(s(x), y, y) → f(y, x, s(x))
Q is empty.
(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.
(2) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F(s(x), y, y) → F(y, x, s(x))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
g(x, y) → x
g(x, y) → y
f(s(x), y, y) → f(y, x, s(x))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(3) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].
The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
F(s(x), y, y) → F(y, x, s(x))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
F(
x0,
x1,
x2,
x3) =
F(
x1,
x2)
Tags:
F has argument tags [0,0,1,3] and root tag 0
Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
s1 > F3
Status:
F3: multiset
s1: multiset
The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:
none
(4) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
g(x, y) → x
g(x, y) → y
f(s(x), y, y) → f(y, x, s(x))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(5) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.
(6) TRUE