Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS
↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)
↳2 QDP
↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
↳4 AND
    ↳5 QDP
        ↳6 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳7 QDP
        ↳8 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
        ↳9 TRUE
    ↳10 QDP
        ↳11 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳12 QDP
        ↳13 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳14 QDP
        ↳15 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
        ↳16 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

minus(x, 0) → x
minus(s(x), s(y)) → minus(x, y)
f(0) → s(0)
f(s(x)) → minus(s(x), g(f(x)))
g(0) → 0
g(s(x)) → minus(s(x), f(g(x)))

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MINUS(s(x), s(y)) → MINUS(x, y)
F(s(x)) → MINUS(s(x), g(f(x)))
F(s(x)) → G(f(x))
F(s(x)) → F(x)
G(s(x)) → MINUS(s(x), f(g(x)))
G(s(x)) → F(g(x))
G(s(x)) → G(x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

minus(x, 0) → x
minus(s(x), s(y)) → minus(x, y)
f(0) → s(0)
f(s(x)) → minus(s(x), g(f(x)))
g(0) → 0
g(s(x)) → minus(s(x), f(g(x)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 2 SCCs with 2 less nodes.

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MINUS(s(x), s(y)) → MINUS(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

minus(x, 0) → x
minus(s(x), s(y)) → minus(x, y)
f(0) → s(0)
f(s(x)) → minus(s(x), g(f(x)))
g(0) → 0
g(s(x)) → minus(s(x), f(g(x)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MINUS(s(x), s(y)) → MINUS(x, y)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
MINUS(x0, x1, x2)  =  MINUS(x1)

Tags:
MINUS has argument tags [1,0,1] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MINUS(x1, x2)  =  x2
s(x1)  =  s(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
s1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

minus(x, 0) → x
minus(s(x), s(y)) → minus(x, y)
f(0) → s(0)
f(s(x)) → minus(s(x), g(f(x)))
g(0) → 0
g(s(x)) → minus(s(x), f(g(x)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(9) TRUE

(10) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

F(s(x)) → G(f(x))
G(s(x)) → F(g(x))
F(s(x)) → F(x)
G(s(x)) → G(x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

minus(x, 0) → x
minus(s(x), s(y)) → minus(x, y)
f(0) → s(0)
f(s(x)) → minus(s(x), g(f(x)))
g(0) → 0
g(s(x)) → minus(s(x), f(g(x)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(11) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


F(s(x)) → F(x)
G(s(x)) → G(x)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
F(x0, x1)  =  F(x0)
G(x0, x1)  =  G(x0)

Tags:
F has argument tags [1,0] and root tag 1
G has argument tags [1,0] and root tag 1

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
F(x1)  =  F(x1)
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
G(x1)  =  G(x1)
f(x1)  =  f(x1)
g(x1)  =  g(x1)
0  =  0
minus(x1, x2)  =  x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[F1, G1] > [s1, f1, g1]
0 > [s1, f1, g1]

Status:
F1: [1]
s1: [1]
G1: [1]
f1: [1]
g1: [1]
0: []


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

f(0) → s(0)
f(s(x)) → minus(s(x), g(f(x)))
g(0) → 0
g(s(x)) → minus(s(x), f(g(x)))
minus(x, 0) → x
minus(s(x), s(y)) → minus(x, y)

(12) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

F(s(x)) → G(f(x))
G(s(x)) → F(g(x))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

minus(x, 0) → x
minus(s(x), s(y)) → minus(x, y)
f(0) → s(0)
f(s(x)) → minus(s(x), g(f(x)))
g(0) → 0
g(s(x)) → minus(s(x), f(g(x)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(13) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


F(s(x)) → G(f(x))
G(s(x)) → F(g(x))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
F(x0, x1)  =  F(x0, x1)
G(x0, x1)  =  G(x0, x1)

Tags:
F has argument tags [2,0] and root tag 1
G has argument tags [3,0] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
F(x1)  =  F
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
G(x1)  =  G
f(x1)  =  f(x1)
g(x1)  =  g(x1)
0  =  0
minus(x1, x2)  =  x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
0 > [F, s1, G, f1] > g1

Status:
F: []
s1: [1]
G: []
f1: [1]
g1: [1]
0: []


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(14) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

minus(x, 0) → x
minus(s(x), s(y)) → minus(x, y)
f(0) → s(0)
f(s(x)) → minus(s(x), g(f(x)))
g(0) → 0
g(s(x)) → minus(s(x), f(g(x)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(15) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(16) TRUE