(0) Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
g(s(x)) → f(x)
f(0) → s(0)
f(s(x)) → s(s(g(x)))
g(0) → 0
Q is empty.
(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.
(2) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
G(s(x)) → F(x)
F(s(x)) → G(x)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
g(s(x)) → f(x)
f(0) → s(0)
f(s(x)) → s(s(g(x)))
g(0) → 0
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(3) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].
The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
G(s(x)) → F(x)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
G(
x1) =
G(
x1)
s(
x1) =
s(
x1)
F(
x1) =
x1
Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[G1, s1]
Status:
G1: multiset
s1: multiset
The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:
none
(4) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F(s(x)) → G(x)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
g(s(x)) → f(x)
f(0) → s(0)
f(s(x)) → s(s(g(x)))
g(0) → 0
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(5) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node.
(6) TRUE