Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS
↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)
↳2 QDP
↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
↳4 AND
    ↳5 QDP
        ↳6 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳7 QDP
        ↳8 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
        ↳9 TRUE
    ↳10 QDP
        ↳11 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳12 QDP
        ↳13 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
        ↳14 TRUE
    ↳15 QDP
        ↳16 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳17 QDP
        ↳18 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
        ↳19 TRUE
    ↳20 QDP
        ↳21 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳22 QDP
        ↳23 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
        ↳24 TRUE
    ↳25 QDP
        ↳26 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳27 QDP
        ↳28 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
        ↳29 TRUE
    ↳30 QDP
        ↳31 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳32 QDP
        ↳33 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳34 QDP
        ↳35 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
        ↳36 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(x)) → false
eq(s(x), 0) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
le(0, y) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
app(nil, y) → y
app(add(n, x), y) → add(n, app(x, y))
min(add(n, nil)) → n
min(add(n, add(m, x))) → if_min(le(n, m), add(n, add(m, x)))
if_min(true, add(n, add(m, x))) → min(add(n, x))
if_min(false, add(n, add(m, x))) → min(add(m, x))
rm(n, nil) → nil
rm(n, add(m, x)) → if_rm(eq(n, m), n, add(m, x))
if_rm(true, n, add(m, x)) → rm(n, x)
if_rm(false, n, add(m, x)) → add(m, rm(n, x))
minsort(nil, nil) → nil
minsort(add(n, x), y) → if_minsort(eq(n, min(add(n, x))), add(n, x), y)
if_minsort(true, add(n, x), y) → add(n, minsort(app(rm(n, x), y), nil))
if_minsort(false, add(n, x), y) → minsort(x, add(n, y))

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EQ(s(x), s(y)) → EQ(x, y)
LE(s(x), s(y)) → LE(x, y)
APP(add(n, x), y) → APP(x, y)
MIN(add(n, add(m, x))) → IF_MIN(le(n, m), add(n, add(m, x)))
MIN(add(n, add(m, x))) → LE(n, m)
IF_MIN(true, add(n, add(m, x))) → MIN(add(n, x))
IF_MIN(false, add(n, add(m, x))) → MIN(add(m, x))
RM(n, add(m, x)) → IF_RM(eq(n, m), n, add(m, x))
RM(n, add(m, x)) → EQ(n, m)
IF_RM(true, n, add(m, x)) → RM(n, x)
IF_RM(false, n, add(m, x)) → RM(n, x)
MINSORT(add(n, x), y) → IF_MINSORT(eq(n, min(add(n, x))), add(n, x), y)
MINSORT(add(n, x), y) → EQ(n, min(add(n, x)))
MINSORT(add(n, x), y) → MIN(add(n, x))
IF_MINSORT(true, add(n, x), y) → MINSORT(app(rm(n, x), y), nil)
IF_MINSORT(true, add(n, x), y) → APP(rm(n, x), y)
IF_MINSORT(true, add(n, x), y) → RM(n, x)
IF_MINSORT(false, add(n, x), y) → MINSORT(x, add(n, y))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(x)) → false
eq(s(x), 0) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
le(0, y) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
app(nil, y) → y
app(add(n, x), y) → add(n, app(x, y))
min(add(n, nil)) → n
min(add(n, add(m, x))) → if_min(le(n, m), add(n, add(m, x)))
if_min(true, add(n, add(m, x))) → min(add(n, x))
if_min(false, add(n, add(m, x))) → min(add(m, x))
rm(n, nil) → nil
rm(n, add(m, x)) → if_rm(eq(n, m), n, add(m, x))
if_rm(true, n, add(m, x)) → rm(n, x)
if_rm(false, n, add(m, x)) → add(m, rm(n, x))
minsort(nil, nil) → nil
minsort(add(n, x), y) → if_minsort(eq(n, min(add(n, x))), add(n, x), y)
if_minsort(true, add(n, x), y) → add(n, minsort(app(rm(n, x), y), nil))
if_minsort(false, add(n, x), y) → minsort(x, add(n, y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 6 SCCs with 6 less nodes.

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP(add(n, x), y) → APP(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(x)) → false
eq(s(x), 0) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
le(0, y) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
app(nil, y) → y
app(add(n, x), y) → add(n, app(x, y))
min(add(n, nil)) → n
min(add(n, add(m, x))) → if_min(le(n, m), add(n, add(m, x)))
if_min(true, add(n, add(m, x))) → min(add(n, x))
if_min(false, add(n, add(m, x))) → min(add(m, x))
rm(n, nil) → nil
rm(n, add(m, x)) → if_rm(eq(n, m), n, add(m, x))
if_rm(true, n, add(m, x)) → rm(n, x)
if_rm(false, n, add(m, x)) → add(m, rm(n, x))
minsort(nil, nil) → nil
minsort(add(n, x), y) → if_minsort(eq(n, min(add(n, x))), add(n, x), y)
if_minsort(true, add(n, x), y) → add(n, minsort(app(rm(n, x), y), nil))
if_minsort(false, add(n, x), y) → minsort(x, add(n, y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


APP(add(n, x), y) → APP(x, y)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(APP(x1, x2)) = x1   
POL(add(x1, x2)) = 1 + x2   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(x)) → false
eq(s(x), 0) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
le(0, y) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
app(nil, y) → y
app(add(n, x), y) → add(n, app(x, y))
min(add(n, nil)) → n
min(add(n, add(m, x))) → if_min(le(n, m), add(n, add(m, x)))
if_min(true, add(n, add(m, x))) → min(add(n, x))
if_min(false, add(n, add(m, x))) → min(add(m, x))
rm(n, nil) → nil
rm(n, add(m, x)) → if_rm(eq(n, m), n, add(m, x))
if_rm(true, n, add(m, x)) → rm(n, x)
if_rm(false, n, add(m, x)) → add(m, rm(n, x))
minsort(nil, nil) → nil
minsort(add(n, x), y) → if_minsort(eq(n, min(add(n, x))), add(n, x), y)
if_minsort(true, add(n, x), y) → add(n, minsort(app(rm(n, x), y), nil))
if_minsort(false, add(n, x), y) → minsort(x, add(n, y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(9) TRUE

(10) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LE(s(x), s(y)) → LE(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(x)) → false
eq(s(x), 0) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
le(0, y) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
app(nil, y) → y
app(add(n, x), y) → add(n, app(x, y))
min(add(n, nil)) → n
min(add(n, add(m, x))) → if_min(le(n, m), add(n, add(m, x)))
if_min(true, add(n, add(m, x))) → min(add(n, x))
if_min(false, add(n, add(m, x))) → min(add(m, x))
rm(n, nil) → nil
rm(n, add(m, x)) → if_rm(eq(n, m), n, add(m, x))
if_rm(true, n, add(m, x)) → rm(n, x)
if_rm(false, n, add(m, x)) → add(m, rm(n, x))
minsort(nil, nil) → nil
minsort(add(n, x), y) → if_minsort(eq(n, min(add(n, x))), add(n, x), y)
if_minsort(true, add(n, x), y) → add(n, minsort(app(rm(n, x), y), nil))
if_minsort(false, add(n, x), y) → minsort(x, add(n, y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(11) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


LE(s(x), s(y)) → LE(x, y)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(LE(x1, x2)) = x2   
POL(s(x1)) = 1 + x1   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(12) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(x)) → false
eq(s(x), 0) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
le(0, y) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
app(nil, y) → y
app(add(n, x), y) → add(n, app(x, y))
min(add(n, nil)) → n
min(add(n, add(m, x))) → if_min(le(n, m), add(n, add(m, x)))
if_min(true, add(n, add(m, x))) → min(add(n, x))
if_min(false, add(n, add(m, x))) → min(add(m, x))
rm(n, nil) → nil
rm(n, add(m, x)) → if_rm(eq(n, m), n, add(m, x))
if_rm(true, n, add(m, x)) → rm(n, x)
if_rm(false, n, add(m, x)) → add(m, rm(n, x))
minsort(nil, nil) → nil
minsort(add(n, x), y) → if_minsort(eq(n, min(add(n, x))), add(n, x), y)
if_minsort(true, add(n, x), y) → add(n, minsort(app(rm(n, x), y), nil))
if_minsort(false, add(n, x), y) → minsort(x, add(n, y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(13) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(14) TRUE

(15) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MIN(add(n, add(m, x))) → IF_MIN(le(n, m), add(n, add(m, x)))
IF_MIN(true, add(n, add(m, x))) → MIN(add(n, x))
IF_MIN(false, add(n, add(m, x))) → MIN(add(m, x))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(x)) → false
eq(s(x), 0) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
le(0, y) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
app(nil, y) → y
app(add(n, x), y) → add(n, app(x, y))
min(add(n, nil)) → n
min(add(n, add(m, x))) → if_min(le(n, m), add(n, add(m, x)))
if_min(true, add(n, add(m, x))) → min(add(n, x))
if_min(false, add(n, add(m, x))) → min(add(m, x))
rm(n, nil) → nil
rm(n, add(m, x)) → if_rm(eq(n, m), n, add(m, x))
if_rm(true, n, add(m, x)) → rm(n, x)
if_rm(false, n, add(m, x)) → add(m, rm(n, x))
minsort(nil, nil) → nil
minsort(add(n, x), y) → if_minsort(eq(n, min(add(n, x))), add(n, x), y)
if_minsort(true, add(n, x), y) → add(n, minsort(app(rm(n, x), y), nil))
if_minsort(false, add(n, x), y) → minsort(x, add(n, y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(16) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MIN(add(n, add(m, x))) → IF_MIN(le(n, m), add(n, add(m, x)))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(0) = 0   
POL(IF_MIN(x1, x2)) = x2   
POL(MIN(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL(add(x1, x2)) = 1 + x2   
POL(false) = 0   
POL(le(x1, x2)) = 0   
POL(s(x1)) = 0   
POL(true) = 0   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(17) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

IF_MIN(true, add(n, add(m, x))) → MIN(add(n, x))
IF_MIN(false, add(n, add(m, x))) → MIN(add(m, x))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(x)) → false
eq(s(x), 0) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
le(0, y) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
app(nil, y) → y
app(add(n, x), y) → add(n, app(x, y))
min(add(n, nil)) → n
min(add(n, add(m, x))) → if_min(le(n, m), add(n, add(m, x)))
if_min(true, add(n, add(m, x))) → min(add(n, x))
if_min(false, add(n, add(m, x))) → min(add(m, x))
rm(n, nil) → nil
rm(n, add(m, x)) → if_rm(eq(n, m), n, add(m, x))
if_rm(true, n, add(m, x)) → rm(n, x)
if_rm(false, n, add(m, x)) → add(m, rm(n, x))
minsort(nil, nil) → nil
minsort(add(n, x), y) → if_minsort(eq(n, min(add(n, x))), add(n, x), y)
if_minsort(true, add(n, x), y) → add(n, minsort(app(rm(n, x), y), nil))
if_minsort(false, add(n, x), y) → minsort(x, add(n, y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(18) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 2 less nodes.

(19) TRUE

(20) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EQ(s(x), s(y)) → EQ(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(x)) → false
eq(s(x), 0) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
le(0, y) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
app(nil, y) → y
app(add(n, x), y) → add(n, app(x, y))
min(add(n, nil)) → n
min(add(n, add(m, x))) → if_min(le(n, m), add(n, add(m, x)))
if_min(true, add(n, add(m, x))) → min(add(n, x))
if_min(false, add(n, add(m, x))) → min(add(m, x))
rm(n, nil) → nil
rm(n, add(m, x)) → if_rm(eq(n, m), n, add(m, x))
if_rm(true, n, add(m, x)) → rm(n, x)
if_rm(false, n, add(m, x)) → add(m, rm(n, x))
minsort(nil, nil) → nil
minsort(add(n, x), y) → if_minsort(eq(n, min(add(n, x))), add(n, x), y)
if_minsort(true, add(n, x), y) → add(n, minsort(app(rm(n, x), y), nil))
if_minsort(false, add(n, x), y) → minsort(x, add(n, y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(21) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


EQ(s(x), s(y)) → EQ(x, y)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(EQ(x1, x2)) = x2   
POL(s(x1)) = 1 + x1   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(22) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(x)) → false
eq(s(x), 0) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
le(0, y) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
app(nil, y) → y
app(add(n, x), y) → add(n, app(x, y))
min(add(n, nil)) → n
min(add(n, add(m, x))) → if_min(le(n, m), add(n, add(m, x)))
if_min(true, add(n, add(m, x))) → min(add(n, x))
if_min(false, add(n, add(m, x))) → min(add(m, x))
rm(n, nil) → nil
rm(n, add(m, x)) → if_rm(eq(n, m), n, add(m, x))
if_rm(true, n, add(m, x)) → rm(n, x)
if_rm(false, n, add(m, x)) → add(m, rm(n, x))
minsort(nil, nil) → nil
minsort(add(n, x), y) → if_minsort(eq(n, min(add(n, x))), add(n, x), y)
if_minsort(true, add(n, x), y) → add(n, minsort(app(rm(n, x), y), nil))
if_minsort(false, add(n, x), y) → minsort(x, add(n, y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(23) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(24) TRUE

(25) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

RM(n, add(m, x)) → IF_RM(eq(n, m), n, add(m, x))
IF_RM(true, n, add(m, x)) → RM(n, x)
IF_RM(false, n, add(m, x)) → RM(n, x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(x)) → false
eq(s(x), 0) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
le(0, y) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
app(nil, y) → y
app(add(n, x), y) → add(n, app(x, y))
min(add(n, nil)) → n
min(add(n, add(m, x))) → if_min(le(n, m), add(n, add(m, x)))
if_min(true, add(n, add(m, x))) → min(add(n, x))
if_min(false, add(n, add(m, x))) → min(add(m, x))
rm(n, nil) → nil
rm(n, add(m, x)) → if_rm(eq(n, m), n, add(m, x))
if_rm(true, n, add(m, x)) → rm(n, x)
if_rm(false, n, add(m, x)) → add(m, rm(n, x))
minsort(nil, nil) → nil
minsort(add(n, x), y) → if_minsort(eq(n, min(add(n, x))), add(n, x), y)
if_minsort(true, add(n, x), y) → add(n, minsort(app(rm(n, x), y), nil))
if_minsort(false, add(n, x), y) → minsort(x, add(n, y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(26) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


IF_RM(true, n, add(m, x)) → RM(n, x)
IF_RM(false, n, add(m, x)) → RM(n, x)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(0) = 0   
POL(IF_RM(x1, x2, x3)) = 1 + x3   
POL(RM(x1, x2)) = 1 + x2   
POL(add(x1, x2)) = 1 + x2   
POL(eq(x1, x2)) = 0   
POL(false) = 0   
POL(s(x1)) = 0   
POL(true) = 0   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(27) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

RM(n, add(m, x)) → IF_RM(eq(n, m), n, add(m, x))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(x)) → false
eq(s(x), 0) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
le(0, y) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
app(nil, y) → y
app(add(n, x), y) → add(n, app(x, y))
min(add(n, nil)) → n
min(add(n, add(m, x))) → if_min(le(n, m), add(n, add(m, x)))
if_min(true, add(n, add(m, x))) → min(add(n, x))
if_min(false, add(n, add(m, x))) → min(add(m, x))
rm(n, nil) → nil
rm(n, add(m, x)) → if_rm(eq(n, m), n, add(m, x))
if_rm(true, n, add(m, x)) → rm(n, x)
if_rm(false, n, add(m, x)) → add(m, rm(n, x))
minsort(nil, nil) → nil
minsort(add(n, x), y) → if_minsort(eq(n, min(add(n, x))), add(n, x), y)
if_minsort(true, add(n, x), y) → add(n, minsort(app(rm(n, x), y), nil))
if_minsort(false, add(n, x), y) → minsort(x, add(n, y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(28) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node.

(29) TRUE

(30) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

IF_MINSORT(true, add(n, x), y) → MINSORT(app(rm(n, x), y), nil)
MINSORT(add(n, x), y) → IF_MINSORT(eq(n, min(add(n, x))), add(n, x), y)
IF_MINSORT(false, add(n, x), y) → MINSORT(x, add(n, y))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(x)) → false
eq(s(x), 0) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
le(0, y) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
app(nil, y) → y
app(add(n, x), y) → add(n, app(x, y))
min(add(n, nil)) → n
min(add(n, add(m, x))) → if_min(le(n, m), add(n, add(m, x)))
if_min(true, add(n, add(m, x))) → min(add(n, x))
if_min(false, add(n, add(m, x))) → min(add(m, x))
rm(n, nil) → nil
rm(n, add(m, x)) → if_rm(eq(n, m), n, add(m, x))
if_rm(true, n, add(m, x)) → rm(n, x)
if_rm(false, n, add(m, x)) → add(m, rm(n, x))
minsort(nil, nil) → nil
minsort(add(n, x), y) → if_minsort(eq(n, min(add(n, x))), add(n, x), y)
if_minsort(true, add(n, x), y) → add(n, minsort(app(rm(n, x), y), nil))
if_minsort(false, add(n, x), y) → minsort(x, add(n, y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(31) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


IF_MINSORT(true, add(n, x), y) → MINSORT(app(rm(n, x), y), nil)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(0) = 0   
POL(IF_MINSORT(x1, x2, x3)) = x2 + x3   
POL(MINSORT(x1, x2)) = x1 + x2   
POL(add(x1, x2)) = 1 + x2   
POL(app(x1, x2)) = x1 + x2   
POL(eq(x1, x2)) = 0   
POL(false) = 0   
POL(if_min(x1, x2)) = 0   
POL(if_rm(x1, x2, x3)) = x3   
POL(le(x1, x2)) = 1   
POL(min(x1)) = 0   
POL(nil) = 0   
POL(rm(x1, x2)) = x2   
POL(s(x1)) = 0   
POL(true) = 0   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

rm(n, nil) → nil
rm(n, add(m, x)) → if_rm(eq(n, m), n, add(m, x))
if_rm(true, n, add(m, x)) → rm(n, x)
app(nil, y) → y
app(add(n, x), y) → add(n, app(x, y))
if_rm(false, n, add(m, x)) → add(m, rm(n, x))

(32) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MINSORT(add(n, x), y) → IF_MINSORT(eq(n, min(add(n, x))), add(n, x), y)
IF_MINSORT(false, add(n, x), y) → MINSORT(x, add(n, y))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(x)) → false
eq(s(x), 0) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
le(0, y) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
app(nil, y) → y
app(add(n, x), y) → add(n, app(x, y))
min(add(n, nil)) → n
min(add(n, add(m, x))) → if_min(le(n, m), add(n, add(m, x)))
if_min(true, add(n, add(m, x))) → min(add(n, x))
if_min(false, add(n, add(m, x))) → min(add(m, x))
rm(n, nil) → nil
rm(n, add(m, x)) → if_rm(eq(n, m), n, add(m, x))
if_rm(true, n, add(m, x)) → rm(n, x)
if_rm(false, n, add(m, x)) → add(m, rm(n, x))
minsort(nil, nil) → nil
minsort(add(n, x), y) → if_minsort(eq(n, min(add(n, x))), add(n, x), y)
if_minsort(true, add(n, x), y) → add(n, minsort(app(rm(n, x), y), nil))
if_minsort(false, add(n, x), y) → minsort(x, add(n, y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(33) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


IF_MINSORT(false, add(n, x), y) → MINSORT(x, add(n, y))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(0) = 0   
POL(IF_MINSORT(x1, x2, x3)) = x2   
POL(MINSORT(x1, x2)) = x1   
POL(add(x1, x2)) = 1 + x2   
POL(eq(x1, x2)) = 0   
POL(false) = 0   
POL(if_min(x1, x2)) = 0   
POL(le(x1, x2)) = 0   
POL(min(x1)) = 0   
POL(nil) = 0   
POL(s(x1)) = 0   
POL(true) = 0   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(34) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MINSORT(add(n, x), y) → IF_MINSORT(eq(n, min(add(n, x))), add(n, x), y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(x)) → false
eq(s(x), 0) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
le(0, y) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
app(nil, y) → y
app(add(n, x), y) → add(n, app(x, y))
min(add(n, nil)) → n
min(add(n, add(m, x))) → if_min(le(n, m), add(n, add(m, x)))
if_min(true, add(n, add(m, x))) → min(add(n, x))
if_min(false, add(n, add(m, x))) → min(add(m, x))
rm(n, nil) → nil
rm(n, add(m, x)) → if_rm(eq(n, m), n, add(m, x))
if_rm(true, n, add(m, x)) → rm(n, x)
if_rm(false, n, add(m, x)) → add(m, rm(n, x))
minsort(nil, nil) → nil
minsort(add(n, x), y) → if_minsort(eq(n, min(add(n, x))), add(n, x), y)
if_minsort(true, add(n, x), y) → add(n, minsort(app(rm(n, x), y), nil))
if_minsort(false, add(n, x), y) → minsort(x, add(n, y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(35) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node.

(36) TRUE