Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

g(x, a, b) → g(b, b, a)

Q is empty.

(1) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Used ordering:
Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Precedence:

b > g₃ > a

Status:

a: []
g₃: [3,1,2]
b: []

With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly:

g(x, a, b) → g(b, b, a)

(2) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
R is empty.
Q is empty.

(3) RisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven.

(4) TRUE