Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could not be shown:

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
min(x, 0) → 0
min(0, y) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → s(min(x, y))
twice(0) → 0
twice(s(x)) → s(s(twice(x)))
f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(y, min(x, y)), s(twice(min(x, y))))
f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(x, min(x, y)), s(twice(min(x, y))))

Q is empty.

(1) AAECC Innermost (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We have applied [NOC,AAECCNOC] to switch to innermost. The TRS R 1 is

-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
min(x, 0) → 0
min(0, y) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → s(min(x, y))
twice(0) → 0
twice(s(x)) → s(s(twice(x)))

The TRS R 2 is

f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(y, min(x, y)), s(twice(min(x, y))))
f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(x, min(x, y)), s(twice(min(x, y))))

The signature Sigma is {f}

(2) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
min(x, 0) → 0
min(0, y) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → s(min(x, y))
twice(0) → 0
twice(s(x)) → s(s(twice(x)))
f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(y, min(x, y)), s(twice(min(x, y))))
f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(x, min(x, y)), s(twice(min(x, y))))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

-(x0, 0)
-(s(x0), s(x1))
min(x0, 0)
min(0, x0)
min(s(x0), s(x1))
twice(0)
twice(s(x0))
f(s(x0), s(x1))

(3) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(4) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

-¹(s(x), s(y)) → -¹(x, y)
MIN(s(x), s(y)) → MIN(x, y)
TWICE(s(x)) → TWICE(x)
F(s(x), s(y)) → F(-(y, min(x, y)), s(twice(min(x, y))))
F(s(x), s(y)) → -¹(y, min(x, y))
F(s(x), s(y)) → MIN(x, y)
F(s(x), s(y)) → TWICE(min(x, y))
F(s(x), s(y)) → F(-(x, min(x, y)), s(twice(min(x, y))))
F(s(x), s(y)) → -¹(x, min(x, y))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
min(x, 0) → 0
min(0, y) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → s(min(x, y))
twice(0) → 0
twice(s(x)) → s(s(twice(x)))
f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(y, min(x, y)), s(twice(min(x, y))))
f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(x, min(x, y)), s(twice(min(x, y))))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

-(x0, 0)
-(s(x0), s(x1))
min(x0, 0)
min(0, x0)
min(s(x0), s(x1))
twice(0)
twice(s(x0))
f(s(x0), s(x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(5) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 4 SCCs with 4 less nodes.

(6) Complex Obligation (AND)

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TWICE(s(x)) → TWICE(x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
min(x, 0) → 0
min(0, y) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → s(min(x, y))
twice(0) → 0
twice(s(x)) → s(s(twice(x)))
f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(y, min(x, y)), s(twice(min(x, y))))
f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(x, min(x, y)), s(twice(min(x, y))))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

-(x0, 0)
-(s(x0), s(x1))
min(x0, 0)
min(0, x0)
min(s(x0), s(x1))
twice(0)
twice(s(x0))
f(s(x0), s(x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

TWICE(s(x)) → TWICE(x)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
TWICE(x1)  =  TWICE(x1)
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
-(x1, x2)  =  -(x1, x2)
0  =  0
min(x1, x2)  =  min(x2)
twice(x1)  =  twice(x1)
f(x1, x2)  =  f

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

TWICE₁ > [s₁, -₂]
[0, min₁] > [s₁, -₂]
[twice₁, f] > [s₁, -₂]

Status:

f: []
-₂: [2,1]
s₁: [1]
twice₁: [1]
min₁: [1]
0: []
TWICE₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
min(x, 0) → 0
min(0, y) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → s(min(x, y))
twice(0) → 0
twice(s(x)) → s(s(twice(x)))
f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(y, min(x, y)), s(twice(min(x, y))))
f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(x, min(x, y)), s(twice(min(x, y))))

(9) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
min(x, 0) → 0
min(0, y) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → s(min(x, y))
twice(0) → 0
twice(s(x)) → s(s(twice(x)))
f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(y, min(x, y)), s(twice(min(x, y))))
f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(x, min(x, y)), s(twice(min(x, y))))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

-(x0, 0)
-(s(x0), s(x1))
min(x0, 0)
min(0, x0)
min(s(x0), s(x1))
twice(0)
twice(s(x0))
f(s(x0), s(x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(10) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(11) TRUE

(12) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MIN(s(x), s(y)) → MIN(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
min(x, 0) → 0
min(0, y) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → s(min(x, y))
twice(0) → 0
twice(s(x)) → s(s(twice(x)))
f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(y, min(x, y)), s(twice(min(x, y))))
f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(x, min(x, y)), s(twice(min(x, y))))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

-(x0, 0)
-(s(x0), s(x1))
min(x0, 0)
min(0, x0)
min(s(x0), s(x1))
twice(0)
twice(s(x0))
f(s(x0), s(x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(13) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MIN(s(x), s(y)) → MIN(x, y)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MIN(x1, x2)  =  MIN(x2)
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
-(x1, x2)  =  -(x1, x2)
0  =  0
min(x1, x2)  =  min(x1, x2)
twice(x1)  =  twice(x1)
f(x1, x2)  =  f

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

MIN₁ > [s₁, -₂]
0 > [s₁, -₂]
f > min₂ > [s₁, -₂]
f > twice₁ > [s₁, -₂]

Status:

f: []
-₂: [2,1]
MIN₁: [1]
s₁: [1]
twice₁: [1]
min₂: [2,1]
0: []

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
min(x, 0) → 0
min(0, y) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → s(min(x, y))
twice(0) → 0
twice(s(x)) → s(s(twice(x)))
f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(y, min(x, y)), s(twice(min(x, y))))
f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(x, min(x, y)), s(twice(min(x, y))))

(14) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
min(x, 0) → 0
min(0, y) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → s(min(x, y))
twice(0) → 0
twice(s(x)) → s(s(twice(x)))
f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(y, min(x, y)), s(twice(min(x, y))))
f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(x, min(x, y)), s(twice(min(x, y))))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

-(x0, 0)
-(s(x0), s(x1))
min(x0, 0)
min(0, x0)
min(s(x0), s(x1))
twice(0)
twice(s(x0))
f(s(x0), s(x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(15) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(16) TRUE

(17) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

-¹(s(x), s(y)) → -¹(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
min(x, 0) → 0
min(0, y) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → s(min(x, y))
twice(0) → 0
twice(s(x)) → s(s(twice(x)))
f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(y, min(x, y)), s(twice(min(x, y))))
f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(x, min(x, y)), s(twice(min(x, y))))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

-(x0, 0)
-(s(x0), s(x1))
min(x0, 0)
min(0, x0)
min(s(x0), s(x1))
twice(0)
twice(s(x0))
f(s(x0), s(x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(18) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

-¹(s(x), s(y)) → -¹(x, y)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
-¹(x1, x2)  =  -¹(x2)
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
-(x1, x2)  =  -(x1, x2)
0  =  0
min(x1, x2)  =  min(x1, x2)
twice(x1)  =  twice(x1)
f(x1, x2)  =  f

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

f > min₂ > [s₁, -₂]
f > min₂ > 0
f > twice₁ > [s₁, -₂]
f > twice₁ > 0

Status:

f: []
-₂: [2,1]
-^1₁: [1]
s₁: [1]
twice₁: [1]
min₂: [2,1]
0: []

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
min(x, 0) → 0
min(0, y) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → s(min(x, y))
twice(0) → 0
twice(s(x)) → s(s(twice(x)))
f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(y, min(x, y)), s(twice(min(x, y))))
f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(x, min(x, y)), s(twice(min(x, y))))

(19) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
min(x, 0) → 0
min(0, y) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → s(min(x, y))
twice(0) → 0
twice(s(x)) → s(s(twice(x)))
f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(y, min(x, y)), s(twice(min(x, y))))
f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(x, min(x, y)), s(twice(min(x, y))))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

-(x0, 0)
-(s(x0), s(x1))
min(x0, 0)
min(0, x0)
min(s(x0), s(x1))
twice(0)
twice(s(x0))
f(s(x0), s(x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(20) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(21) TRUE

(22) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

F(s(x), s(y)) → F(-(x, min(x, y)), s(twice(min(x, y))))
F(s(x), s(y)) → F(-(y, min(x, y)), s(twice(min(x, y))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
min(x, 0) → 0
min(0, y) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → s(min(x, y))
twice(0) → 0
twice(s(x)) → s(s(twice(x)))
f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(y, min(x, y)), s(twice(min(x, y))))
f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(x, min(x, y)), s(twice(min(x, y))))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

-(x0, 0)
-(s(x0), s(x1))
min(x0, 0)
min(0, x0)
min(s(x0), s(x1))
twice(0)
twice(s(x0))
f(s(x0), s(x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.