(0) Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(x, f(y, a)) → f(f(a, f(h(x), y)), a)
Q is empty.
(1) Overlay + Local Confluence (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The TRS is overlay and locally confluent. By [NOC] we can switch to innermost.
(2) Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(x, f(y, a)) → f(f(a, f(h(x), y)), a)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
f(x0, f(x1, a))
(3) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.
(4) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F(x, f(y, a)) → F(f(a, f(h(x), y)), a)
F(x, f(y, a)) → F(a, f(h(x), y))
F(x, f(y, a)) → F(h(x), y)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(x, f(y, a)) → f(f(a, f(h(x), y)), a)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
f(x0, f(x1, a))
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(5) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.
(6) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F(x, f(y, a)) → F(h(x), y)
F(x, f(y, a)) → F(a, f(h(x), y))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(x, f(y, a)) → f(f(a, f(h(x), y)), a)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
f(x0, f(x1, a))
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(7) Instantiation (EQUIVALENT transformation)
By instantiating [LPAR04] the rule
F(
x,
f(
y,
a)) →
F(
h(
x),
y) we obtained the following new rules [LPAR04]:
F(h(z0), f(x1, a)) → F(h(h(z0)), x1)
F(a, f(x1, a)) → F(h(a), x1)
(8) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F(x, f(y, a)) → F(a, f(h(x), y))
F(h(z0), f(x1, a)) → F(h(h(z0)), x1)
F(a, f(x1, a)) → F(h(a), x1)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(x, f(y, a)) → f(f(a, f(h(x), y)), a)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
f(x0, f(x1, a))
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(9) Instantiation (EQUIVALENT transformation)
By instantiating [LPAR04] the rule
F(
x,
f(
y,
a)) →
F(
h(
x),
y) we obtained the following new rules [LPAR04]:
F(h(z0), f(x1, a)) → F(h(h(z0)), x1)
F(a, f(x1, a)) → F(h(a), x1)
(10) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F(x, f(y, a)) → F(a, f(h(x), y))
F(h(z0), f(x1, a)) → F(h(h(z0)), x1)
F(a, f(x1, a)) → F(h(a), x1)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(x, f(y, a)) → f(f(a, f(h(x), y)), a)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
f(x0, f(x1, a))
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(11) Instantiation (EQUIVALENT transformation)
By instantiating [LPAR04] the rule
F(
x,
f(
y,
a)) →
F(
a,
f(
h(
x),
y)) we obtained the following new rules [LPAR04]:
F(a, f(x1, a)) → F(a, f(h(a), x1))
F(h(h(z0)), f(x1, a)) → F(a, f(h(h(h(z0))), x1))
F(h(a), f(x1, a)) → F(a, f(h(h(a)), x1))
(12) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F(h(z0), f(x1, a)) → F(h(h(z0)), x1)
F(a, f(x1, a)) → F(h(a), x1)
F(a, f(x1, a)) → F(a, f(h(a), x1))
F(h(h(z0)), f(x1, a)) → F(a, f(h(h(h(z0))), x1))
F(h(a), f(x1, a)) → F(a, f(h(h(a)), x1))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(x, f(y, a)) → f(f(a, f(h(x), y)), a)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
f(x0, f(x1, a))
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(13) Instantiation (EQUIVALENT transformation)
By instantiating [LPAR04] the rule
F(
h(
z0),
f(
x1,
a)) →
F(
h(
h(
z0)),
x1) we obtained the following new rules [LPAR04]:
F(h(h(z0)), f(x1, a)) → F(h(h(h(z0))), x1)
F(h(a), f(x1, a)) → F(h(h(a)), x1)
(14) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F(a, f(x1, a)) → F(h(a), x1)
F(a, f(x1, a)) → F(a, f(h(a), x1))
F(h(h(z0)), f(x1, a)) → F(a, f(h(h(h(z0))), x1))
F(h(a), f(x1, a)) → F(a, f(h(h(a)), x1))
F(h(h(z0)), f(x1, a)) → F(h(h(h(z0))), x1)
F(h(a), f(x1, a)) → F(h(h(a)), x1)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(x, f(y, a)) → f(f(a, f(h(x), y)), a)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
f(x0, f(x1, a))
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(15) Instantiation (EQUIVALENT transformation)
By instantiating [LPAR04] the rule
F(
h(
h(
z0)),
f(
x1,
a)) →
F(
a,
f(
h(
h(
h(
z0))),
x1)) we obtained the following new rules [LPAR04]:
F(h(h(h(z0))), f(x1, a)) → F(a, f(h(h(h(h(z0)))), x1))
F(h(h(a)), f(x1, a)) → F(a, f(h(h(h(a))), x1))
(16) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F(a, f(x1, a)) → F(h(a), x1)
F(a, f(x1, a)) → F(a, f(h(a), x1))
F(h(a), f(x1, a)) → F(a, f(h(h(a)), x1))
F(h(h(z0)), f(x1, a)) → F(h(h(h(z0))), x1)
F(h(a), f(x1, a)) → F(h(h(a)), x1)
F(h(h(h(z0))), f(x1, a)) → F(a, f(h(h(h(h(z0)))), x1))
F(h(h(a)), f(x1, a)) → F(a, f(h(h(h(a))), x1))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(x, f(y, a)) → f(f(a, f(h(x), y)), a)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
f(x0, f(x1, a))
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(17) ForwardInstantiation (EQUIVALENT transformation)
By forward instantiating [JAR06] the rule
F(
a,
f(
x1,
a)) →
F(
h(
a),
x1) we obtained the following new rules [LPAR04]:
F(a, f(f(y_0, a), a)) → F(h(a), f(y_0, a))
(18) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F(a, f(x1, a)) → F(a, f(h(a), x1))
F(h(a), f(x1, a)) → F(a, f(h(h(a)), x1))
F(h(h(z0)), f(x1, a)) → F(h(h(h(z0))), x1)
F(h(a), f(x1, a)) → F(h(h(a)), x1)
F(h(h(h(z0))), f(x1, a)) → F(a, f(h(h(h(h(z0)))), x1))
F(h(h(a)), f(x1, a)) → F(a, f(h(h(h(a))), x1))
F(a, f(f(y_0, a), a)) → F(h(a), f(y_0, a))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(x, f(y, a)) → f(f(a, f(h(x), y)), a)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
f(x0, f(x1, a))
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(19) ForwardInstantiation (EQUIVALENT transformation)
By forward instantiating [JAR06] the rule
F(
h(
h(
z0)),
f(
x1,
a)) →
F(
h(
h(
h(
z0))),
x1) we obtained the following new rules [LPAR04]:
F(h(h(x0)), f(f(y_1, a), a)) → F(h(h(h(x0))), f(y_1, a))
(20) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F(a, f(x1, a)) → F(a, f(h(a), x1))
F(h(a), f(x1, a)) → F(a, f(h(h(a)), x1))
F(h(a), f(x1, a)) → F(h(h(a)), x1)
F(h(h(h(z0))), f(x1, a)) → F(a, f(h(h(h(h(z0)))), x1))
F(h(h(a)), f(x1, a)) → F(a, f(h(h(h(a))), x1))
F(a, f(f(y_0, a), a)) → F(h(a), f(y_0, a))
F(h(h(x0)), f(f(y_1, a), a)) → F(h(h(h(x0))), f(y_1, a))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(x, f(y, a)) → f(f(a, f(h(x), y)), a)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
f(x0, f(x1, a))
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(21) ForwardInstantiation (EQUIVALENT transformation)
By forward instantiating [JAR06] the rule
F(
h(
a),
f(
x1,
a)) →
F(
h(
h(
a)),
x1) we obtained the following new rules [LPAR04]:
F(h(a), f(f(y_0, a), a)) → F(h(h(a)), f(y_0, a))
F(h(a), f(f(f(y_1, a), a), a)) → F(h(h(a)), f(f(y_1, a), a))
(22) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F(a, f(x1, a)) → F(a, f(h(a), x1))
F(h(a), f(x1, a)) → F(a, f(h(h(a)), x1))
F(h(h(h(z0))), f(x1, a)) → F(a, f(h(h(h(h(z0)))), x1))
F(h(h(a)), f(x1, a)) → F(a, f(h(h(h(a))), x1))
F(a, f(f(y_0, a), a)) → F(h(a), f(y_0, a))
F(h(h(x0)), f(f(y_1, a), a)) → F(h(h(h(x0))), f(y_1, a))
F(h(a), f(f(y_0, a), a)) → F(h(h(a)), f(y_0, a))
F(h(a), f(f(f(y_1, a), a), a)) → F(h(h(a)), f(f(y_1, a), a))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(x, f(y, a)) → f(f(a, f(h(x), y)), a)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
f(x0, f(x1, a))
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(23) MNOCProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We use the modular non-overlap check [FROCOS05] to decrease Q to the empty set.
(24) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F(a, f(x1, a)) → F(a, f(h(a), x1))
F(h(a), f(x1, a)) → F(a, f(h(h(a)), x1))
F(h(h(h(z0))), f(x1, a)) → F(a, f(h(h(h(h(z0)))), x1))
F(h(h(a)), f(x1, a)) → F(a, f(h(h(h(a))), x1))
F(a, f(f(y_0, a), a)) → F(h(a), f(y_0, a))
F(h(h(x0)), f(f(y_1, a), a)) → F(h(h(h(x0))), f(y_1, a))
F(h(a), f(f(y_0, a), a)) → F(h(h(a)), f(y_0, a))
F(h(a), f(f(f(y_1, a), a), a)) → F(h(h(a)), f(f(y_1, a), a))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(x, f(y, a)) → f(f(a, f(h(x), y)), a)
Q is empty.
We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.
(25) SemLabProof (SOUND transformation)
We found the following model for the rules of the TRS R.
Interpretation over the domain with elements from 0 to 1.a: 1
f: 0
h: 0
F: 0
By semantic labelling [SEMLAB] we obtain the following labelled TRS.
(26) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F.1-0(a., f.0-1(x1, a.)) → F.1-0(a., f.0-0(h.1(a.), x1))
F.1-0(a., f.1-1(x1, a.)) → F.1-0(a., f.0-1(h.1(a.), x1))
F.1-0(a., f.0-1(f.0-1(y_0, a.), a.)) → F.0-0(h.1(a.), f.0-1(y_0, a.))
F.1-0(a., f.0-1(f.1-1(y_0, a.), a.)) → F.0-0(h.1(a.), f.1-1(y_0, a.))
F.0-0(h.1(a.), f.0-1(x1, a.)) → F.1-0(a., f.0-0(h.0(h.1(a.)), x1))
F.0-0(h.1(a.), f.1-1(x1, a.)) → F.1-0(a., f.0-1(h.0(h.1(a.)), x1))
F.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.0(z0))), f.0-1(x1, a.)) → F.1-0(a., f.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.0(h.0(z0)))), x1))
F.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.0(z0))), f.1-1(x1, a.)) → F.1-0(a., f.0-1(h.0(h.0(h.0(h.0(z0)))), x1))
F.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.1(z0))), f.0-1(x1, a.)) → F.1-0(a., f.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.0(h.1(z0)))), x1))
F.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.1(z0))), f.1-1(x1, a.)) → F.1-0(a., f.0-1(h.0(h.0(h.0(h.1(z0)))), x1))
F.0-0(h.0(h.1(a.)), f.0-1(x1, a.)) → F.1-0(a., f.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.1(a.))), x1))
F.0-0(h.0(h.1(a.)), f.1-1(x1, a.)) → F.1-0(a., f.0-1(h.0(h.0(h.1(a.))), x1))
F.0-0(h.1(a.), f.0-1(f.0-1(y_0, a.), a.)) → F.0-0(h.0(h.1(a.)), f.0-1(y_0, a.))
F.0-0(h.1(a.), f.0-1(f.1-1(y_0, a.), a.)) → F.0-0(h.0(h.1(a.)), f.1-1(y_0, a.))
F.0-0(h.1(a.), f.0-1(f.0-1(f.0-1(y_1, a.), a.), a.)) → F.0-0(h.0(h.1(a.)), f.0-1(f.0-1(y_1, a.), a.))
F.0-0(h.1(a.), f.0-1(f.0-1(f.1-1(y_1, a.), a.), a.)) → F.0-0(h.0(h.1(a.)), f.0-1(f.1-1(y_1, a.), a.))
F.0-0(h.0(h.0(x0)), f.0-1(f.0-1(y_1, a.), a.)) → F.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.0(x0))), f.0-1(y_1, a.))
F.0-0(h.0(h.0(x0)), f.0-1(f.1-1(y_1, a.), a.)) → F.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.0(x0))), f.1-1(y_1, a.))
F.0-0(h.0(h.1(x0)), f.0-1(f.0-1(y_1, a.), a.)) → F.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.1(x0))), f.0-1(y_1, a.))
F.0-0(h.0(h.1(x0)), f.0-1(f.1-1(y_1, a.), a.)) → F.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.1(x0))), f.1-1(y_1, a.))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f.1-0(x, f.1-1(y, a.)) → f.0-1(f.1-0(a., f.0-1(h.1(x), y)), a.)
f.1-0(x, f.0-1(y, a.)) → f.0-1(f.1-0(a., f.0-0(h.1(x), y)), a.)
f.0-0(x, f.1-1(y, a.)) → f.0-1(f.1-0(a., f.0-1(h.0(x), y)), a.)
f.0-0(x, f.0-1(y, a.)) → f.0-1(f.1-0(a., f.0-0(h.0(x), y)), a.)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
f.0-0(x0, f.0-1(x1, a.))
f.0-0(x0, f.1-1(x1, a.))
f.1-0(x0, f.0-1(x1, a.))
f.1-0(x0, f.1-1(x1, a.))
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(27) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 3 less nodes.
(28) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F.1-0(a., f.0-1(x1, a.)) → F.1-0(a., f.0-0(h.1(a.), x1))
F.1-0(a., f.0-1(f.0-1(y_0, a.), a.)) → F.0-0(h.1(a.), f.0-1(y_0, a.))
F.0-0(h.1(a.), f.0-1(x1, a.)) → F.1-0(a., f.0-0(h.0(h.1(a.)), x1))
F.0-0(h.1(a.), f.0-1(f.0-1(y_0, a.), a.)) → F.0-0(h.0(h.1(a.)), f.0-1(y_0, a.))
F.0-0(h.0(h.1(a.)), f.0-1(x1, a.)) → F.1-0(a., f.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.1(a.))), x1))
F.0-0(h.0(h.1(x0)), f.0-1(f.0-1(y_1, a.), a.)) → F.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.1(x0))), f.0-1(y_1, a.))
F.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.1(z0))), f.0-1(x1, a.)) → F.1-0(a., f.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.0(h.1(z0)))), x1))
F.0-0(h.0(h.0(x0)), f.0-1(f.0-1(y_1, a.), a.)) → F.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.0(x0))), f.0-1(y_1, a.))
F.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.0(z0))), f.0-1(x1, a.)) → F.1-0(a., f.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.0(h.0(z0)))), x1))
F.0-0(h.0(h.0(x0)), f.0-1(f.1-1(y_1, a.), a.)) → F.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.0(x0))), f.1-1(y_1, a.))
F.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.0(z0))), f.1-1(x1, a.)) → F.1-0(a., f.0-1(h.0(h.0(h.0(h.0(z0)))), x1))
F.0-0(h.0(h.1(x0)), f.0-1(f.1-1(y_1, a.), a.)) → F.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.1(x0))), f.1-1(y_1, a.))
F.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.1(z0))), f.1-1(x1, a.)) → F.1-0(a., f.0-1(h.0(h.0(h.0(h.1(z0)))), x1))
F.0-0(h.1(a.), f.0-1(f.1-1(y_0, a.), a.)) → F.0-0(h.0(h.1(a.)), f.1-1(y_0, a.))
F.0-0(h.0(h.1(a.)), f.1-1(x1, a.)) → F.1-0(a., f.0-1(h.0(h.0(h.1(a.))), x1))
F.0-0(h.1(a.), f.0-1(f.0-1(f.0-1(y_1, a.), a.), a.)) → F.0-0(h.0(h.1(a.)), f.0-1(f.0-1(y_1, a.), a.))
F.0-0(h.1(a.), f.0-1(f.0-1(f.1-1(y_1, a.), a.), a.)) → F.0-0(h.0(h.1(a.)), f.0-1(f.1-1(y_1, a.), a.))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f.1-0(x, f.1-1(y, a.)) → f.0-1(f.1-0(a., f.0-1(h.1(x), y)), a.)
f.1-0(x, f.0-1(y, a.)) → f.0-1(f.1-0(a., f.0-0(h.1(x), y)), a.)
f.0-0(x, f.1-1(y, a.)) → f.0-1(f.1-0(a., f.0-1(h.0(x), y)), a.)
f.0-0(x, f.0-1(y, a.)) → f.0-1(f.1-0(a., f.0-0(h.0(x), y)), a.)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
f.0-0(x0, f.0-1(x1, a.))
f.0-0(x0, f.1-1(x1, a.))
f.1-0(x0, f.0-1(x1, a.))
f.1-0(x0, f.1-1(x1, a.))
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(29) MRRProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
By using the rule removal processor [LPAR04] with the following ordering, at least one Dependency Pair or term rewrite system rule of this QDP problem can be strictly oriented.
Strictly oriented dependency pairs:
F.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.0(z0))), f.1-1(x1, a.)) → F.1-0(a., f.0-1(h.0(h.0(h.0(h.0(z0)))), x1))
F.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.1(z0))), f.1-1(x1, a.)) → F.1-0(a., f.0-1(h.0(h.0(h.0(h.1(z0)))), x1))
F.0-0(h.0(h.1(a.)), f.1-1(x1, a.)) → F.1-0(a., f.0-1(h.0(h.0(h.1(a.))), x1))
Strictly oriented rules of the TRS R:
f.1-0(x, f.1-1(y, a.)) → f.0-1(f.1-0(a., f.0-1(h.1(x), y)), a.)
f.0-0(x, f.1-1(y, a.)) → f.0-1(f.1-0(a., f.0-1(h.0(x), y)), a.)
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:
POL(F.0-0(x1, x2)) = x1 + x2
POL(F.1-0(x1, x2)) = x1 + x2
POL(a.) = 0
POL(f.0-0(x1, x2)) = x1 + x2
POL(f.0-1(x1, x2)) = x1 + x2
POL(f.1-0(x1, x2)) = x1 + x2
POL(f.1-1(x1, x2)) = 1 + x1 + x2
POL(h.0(x1)) = x1
POL(h.1(x1)) = x1
(30) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F.1-0(a., f.0-1(x1, a.)) → F.1-0(a., f.0-0(h.1(a.), x1))
F.1-0(a., f.0-1(f.0-1(y_0, a.), a.)) → F.0-0(h.1(a.), f.0-1(y_0, a.))
F.0-0(h.1(a.), f.0-1(x1, a.)) → F.1-0(a., f.0-0(h.0(h.1(a.)), x1))
F.0-0(h.1(a.), f.0-1(f.0-1(y_0, a.), a.)) → F.0-0(h.0(h.1(a.)), f.0-1(y_0, a.))
F.0-0(h.0(h.1(a.)), f.0-1(x1, a.)) → F.1-0(a., f.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.1(a.))), x1))
F.0-0(h.0(h.1(x0)), f.0-1(f.0-1(y_1, a.), a.)) → F.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.1(x0))), f.0-1(y_1, a.))
F.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.1(z0))), f.0-1(x1, a.)) → F.1-0(a., f.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.0(h.1(z0)))), x1))
F.0-0(h.0(h.0(x0)), f.0-1(f.0-1(y_1, a.), a.)) → F.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.0(x0))), f.0-1(y_1, a.))
F.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.0(z0))), f.0-1(x1, a.)) → F.1-0(a., f.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.0(h.0(z0)))), x1))
F.0-0(h.0(h.0(x0)), f.0-1(f.1-1(y_1, a.), a.)) → F.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.0(x0))), f.1-1(y_1, a.))
F.0-0(h.0(h.1(x0)), f.0-1(f.1-1(y_1, a.), a.)) → F.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.1(x0))), f.1-1(y_1, a.))
F.0-0(h.1(a.), f.0-1(f.1-1(y_0, a.), a.)) → F.0-0(h.0(h.1(a.)), f.1-1(y_0, a.))
F.0-0(h.1(a.), f.0-1(f.0-1(f.0-1(y_1, a.), a.), a.)) → F.0-0(h.0(h.1(a.)), f.0-1(f.0-1(y_1, a.), a.))
F.0-0(h.1(a.), f.0-1(f.0-1(f.1-1(y_1, a.), a.), a.)) → F.0-0(h.0(h.1(a.)), f.0-1(f.1-1(y_1, a.), a.))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f.1-0(x, f.0-1(y, a.)) → f.0-1(f.1-0(a., f.0-0(h.1(x), y)), a.)
f.0-0(x, f.0-1(y, a.)) → f.0-1(f.1-0(a., f.0-0(h.0(x), y)), a.)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
f.0-0(x0, f.0-1(x1, a.))
f.0-0(x0, f.1-1(x1, a.))
f.1-0(x0, f.0-1(x1, a.))
f.1-0(x0, f.1-1(x1, a.))
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(31) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 3 less nodes.
(32) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F.1-0(a., f.0-1(x1, a.)) → F.1-0(a., f.0-0(h.1(a.), x1))
F.1-0(a., f.0-1(f.0-1(y_0, a.), a.)) → F.0-0(h.1(a.), f.0-1(y_0, a.))
F.0-0(h.1(a.), f.0-1(x1, a.)) → F.1-0(a., f.0-0(h.0(h.1(a.)), x1))
F.0-0(h.1(a.), f.0-1(f.0-1(y_0, a.), a.)) → F.0-0(h.0(h.1(a.)), f.0-1(y_0, a.))
F.0-0(h.0(h.1(a.)), f.0-1(x1, a.)) → F.1-0(a., f.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.1(a.))), x1))
F.0-0(h.0(h.1(x0)), f.0-1(f.0-1(y_1, a.), a.)) → F.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.1(x0))), f.0-1(y_1, a.))
F.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.1(z0))), f.0-1(x1, a.)) → F.1-0(a., f.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.0(h.1(z0)))), x1))
F.0-0(h.0(h.0(x0)), f.0-1(f.0-1(y_1, a.), a.)) → F.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.0(x0))), f.0-1(y_1, a.))
F.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.0(z0))), f.0-1(x1, a.)) → F.1-0(a., f.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.0(h.0(z0)))), x1))
F.0-0(h.1(a.), f.0-1(f.0-1(f.0-1(y_1, a.), a.), a.)) → F.0-0(h.0(h.1(a.)), f.0-1(f.0-1(y_1, a.), a.))
F.0-0(h.1(a.), f.0-1(f.0-1(f.1-1(y_1, a.), a.), a.)) → F.0-0(h.0(h.1(a.)), f.0-1(f.1-1(y_1, a.), a.))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f.1-0(x, f.0-1(y, a.)) → f.0-1(f.1-0(a., f.0-0(h.1(x), y)), a.)
f.0-0(x, f.0-1(y, a.)) → f.0-1(f.1-0(a., f.0-0(h.0(x), y)), a.)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
f.0-0(x0, f.0-1(x1, a.))
f.0-0(x0, f.1-1(x1, a.))
f.1-0(x0, f.0-1(x1, a.))
f.1-0(x0, f.1-1(x1, a.))
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(33) MRRProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
By using the rule removal processor [LPAR04] with the following ordering, at least one Dependency Pair or term rewrite system rule of this QDP problem can be strictly oriented.
Strictly oriented dependency pairs:
F.1-0(a., f.0-1(x1, a.)) → F.1-0(a., f.0-0(h.1(a.), x1))
F.1-0(a., f.0-1(f.0-1(y_0, a.), a.)) → F.0-0(h.1(a.), f.0-1(y_0, a.))
F.0-0(h.1(a.), f.0-1(x1, a.)) → F.1-0(a., f.0-0(h.0(h.1(a.)), x1))
F.0-0(h.1(a.), f.0-1(f.0-1(y_0, a.), a.)) → F.0-0(h.0(h.1(a.)), f.0-1(y_0, a.))
F.0-0(h.0(h.1(a.)), f.0-1(x1, a.)) → F.1-0(a., f.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.1(a.))), x1))
F.0-0(h.0(h.1(x0)), f.0-1(f.0-1(y_1, a.), a.)) → F.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.1(x0))), f.0-1(y_1, a.))
F.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.1(z0))), f.0-1(x1, a.)) → F.1-0(a., f.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.0(h.1(z0)))), x1))
F.0-0(h.0(h.0(x0)), f.0-1(f.0-1(y_1, a.), a.)) → F.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.0(x0))), f.0-1(y_1, a.))
F.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.0(z0))), f.0-1(x1, a.)) → F.1-0(a., f.0-0(h.0(h.0(h.0(h.0(z0)))), x1))
F.0-0(h.1(a.), f.0-1(f.0-1(f.0-1(y_1, a.), a.), a.)) → F.0-0(h.0(h.1(a.)), f.0-1(f.0-1(y_1, a.), a.))
F.0-0(h.1(a.), f.0-1(f.0-1(f.1-1(y_1, a.), a.), a.)) → F.0-0(h.0(h.1(a.)), f.0-1(f.1-1(y_1, a.), a.))
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:
POL(F.0-0(x1, x2)) = 1 + x1 + x2
POL(F.1-0(x1, x2)) = 1 + x1 + x2
POL(a.) = 0
POL(f.0-0(x1, x2)) = x1 + x2
POL(f.0-1(x1, x2)) = 1 + x1 + x2
POL(f.1-0(x1, x2)) = x1 + x2
POL(f.1-1(x1, x2)) = x1 + x2
POL(h.0(x1)) = x1
POL(h.1(x1)) = x1
(34) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f.1-0(x, f.0-1(y, a.)) → f.0-1(f.1-0(a., f.0-0(h.1(x), y)), a.)
f.0-0(x, f.0-1(y, a.)) → f.0-1(f.1-0(a., f.0-0(h.0(x), y)), a.)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
f.0-0(x0, f.0-1(x1, a.))
f.0-0(x0, f.1-1(x1, a.))
f.1-0(x0, f.0-1(x1, a.))
f.1-0(x0, f.1-1(x1, a.))
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(35) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.
(36) TRUE