Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS
↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)
↳2 QDP
↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
↳4 AND
  ↳5 QDP
    ↳6 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳7 QDP
    ↳8 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳9 QDP
    ↳10 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳11 QDP
    ↳12 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳13 QDP
    ↳14 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
    ↳15 TRUE
  ↳16 QDP
    ↳17 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳18 QDP
    ↳19 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳20 QDP
    ↳21 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
    ↳22 TRUE
  ↳23 QDP
    ↳24 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳25 QDP
    ↳26 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳27 QDP
    ↳28 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳29 QDP
    ↳30 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳31 QDP
    ↳32 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
    ↳33 TRUE
  ↳34 QDP
    ↳35 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳36 QDP
    ↳37 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳38 QDP
    ↳39 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳40 QDP
    ↳41 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳42 QDP
    ↳43 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
    ↳44 TRUE
  ↳45 QDP
    ↳46 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳47 QDP
    ↳48 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳49 QDP
    ↳50 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳51 QDP
    ↳52 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳53 QDP
    ↳54 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳55 QDP
    ↳56 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
    ↳57 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(U11(tt, M, N)) → MARK(U12(tt, M, N))
ACTIVE(U11(tt, M, N)) → U121(tt, M, N)
ACTIVE(U12(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
ACTIVE(U12(tt, M, N)) → S(plus(N, M))
ACTIVE(U12(tt, M, N)) → PLUS(N, M)
ACTIVE(plus(N, 0)) → MARK(N)
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → MARK(U11(tt, M, N))
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → U111(tt, M, N)
MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U111(mark(X1), X2, X3)
MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(tt) → ACTIVE(tt)
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U121(mark(X1), X2, X3)
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(s(X)) → S(mark(X))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(0) → ACTIVE(0)
U111(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
U111(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
U111(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
U111(active(X1), X2, X3) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
U111(X1, active(X2), X3) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
U111(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
U121(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
U121(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
U121(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
U121(active(X1), X2, X3) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
U121(X1, active(X2), X3) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
U121(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
S(active(X)) → S(X)
PLUS(mark(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(X1, mark(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(active(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(X1, active(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 5 SCCs with 10 less nodes.

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS(X1, mark(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(mark(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(active(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(X1, active(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


PLUS(X1, mark(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
PLUS(x1, x2)  =  PLUS(x2)
mark(x1)  =  mark(x1)
active(x1)  =  x1

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[PLUS1, mark1]

Status:
mark1: multiset
PLUS1: multiset


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS(mark(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(active(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(X1, active(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


PLUS(mark(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
PLUS(x1, x2)  =  PLUS(x1, x2)
mark(x1)  =  mark(x1)
active(x1)  =  x1

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
mark1 > PLUS2

Status:
PLUS2: multiset
mark1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(9) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS(active(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(X1, active(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(10) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


PLUS(X1, active(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
PLUS(x1, x2)  =  x2
active(x1)  =  active(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
active1: multiset


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(11) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS(active(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(12) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


PLUS(active(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
PLUS(x1, x2)  =  PLUS(x1)
active(x1)  =  active(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[PLUS1, active1]

Status:
active1: [1]
PLUS1: multiset


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(13) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(14) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(15) TRUE

(16) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(active(X)) → S(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(17) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


S(active(X)) → S(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
S(x1)  =  S(x1)
active(x1)  =  active(x1)
mark(x1)  =  x1

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[S1, active1]

Status:
active1: multiset
S1: multiset


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(18) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(19) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


S(mark(X)) → S(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
mark1 > S1

Status:
mark1: multiset
S1: multiset


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(20) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(21) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(22) TRUE

(23) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U121(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
U121(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
U121(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
U121(active(X1), X2, X3) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
U121(X1, active(X2), X3) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
U121(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U121(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(24) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


U121(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
U121(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
U121(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U121(x1, x2, x3)  =  U121(x1, x2, x3)
mark(x1)  =  mark(x1)
active(x1)  =  x1

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
U12^13: multiset
mark1: multiset


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(25) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U121(active(X1), X2, X3) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
U121(X1, active(X2), X3) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
U121(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U121(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(26) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


U121(X1, active(X2), X3) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U121(x1, x2, x3)  =  U121(x2)
active(x1)  =  active(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[U12^11, active1]

Status:
active1: [1]
U12^11: multiset


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(27) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U121(active(X1), X2, X3) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
U121(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U121(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(28) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


U121(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U121(x1, x2, x3)  =  x3
active(x1)  =  active(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
active1: multiset


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(29) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U121(active(X1), X2, X3) → U121(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(30) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


U121(active(X1), X2, X3) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U121(x1, x2, x3)  =  U121(x1)
active(x1)  =  active(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[U12^11, active1]

Status:
active1: multiset
U12^11: multiset


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(31) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(32) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(33) TRUE

(34) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U111(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
U111(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
U111(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
U111(active(X1), X2, X3) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
U111(X1, active(X2), X3) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
U111(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U111(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(35) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


U111(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
U111(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
U111(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U111(x1, x2, x3)  =  U111(x1, x2, x3)
mark(x1)  =  mark(x1)
active(x1)  =  x1

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
U11^13: multiset
mark1: multiset


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(36) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U111(active(X1), X2, X3) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
U111(X1, active(X2), X3) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
U111(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U111(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(37) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


U111(X1, active(X2), X3) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U111(x1, x2, x3)  =  U111(x2)
active(x1)  =  active(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[U11^11, active1]

Status:
active1: [1]
U11^11: multiset


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(38) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U111(active(X1), X2, X3) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
U111(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U111(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(39) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


U111(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U111(x1, x2, x3)  =  x3
active(x1)  =  active(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
active1: multiset


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(40) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U111(active(X1), X2, X3) → U111(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(41) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


U111(active(X1), X2, X3) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U111(x1, x2, x3)  =  U111(x1)
active(x1)  =  active(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[U11^11, active1]

Status:
active1: multiset
U11^11: multiset


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(42) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(43) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(44) TRUE

(45) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(U11(tt, M, N)) → MARK(U12(tt, M, N))
MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(U12(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(plus(N, 0)) → MARK(N)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → MARK(U11(tt, M, N))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(46) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MARK(x1)  =  MARK
U11(x1, x2, x3)  =  U11
ACTIVE(x1)  =  x1
mark(x1)  =  mark(x1)
tt  =  tt
U12(x1, x2, x3)  =  U12
s(x1)  =  s
plus(x1, x2)  =  plus
0  =  0
active(x1)  =  active(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[MARK, U11, U12, plus, 0] > mark1 > s > [tt, active1]

Status:
MARK: []
active1: [1]
tt: multiset
plus: []
U12: []
U11: []
mark1: [1]
s: multiset
0: multiset


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)

(47) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(U11(tt, M, N)) → MARK(U12(tt, M, N))
MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(U12(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(plus(N, 0)) → MARK(N)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → MARK(U11(tt, M, N))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(48) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(U12(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(plus(N, 0)) → MARK(N)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → MARK(U11(tt, M, N))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MARK(x1)  =  x1
U11(x1, x2, x3)  =  U11(x1, x2, x3)
ACTIVE(x1)  =  x1
mark(x1)  =  x1
tt  =  tt
U12(x1, x2, x3)  =  U12(x1, x2, x3)
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
plus(x1, x2)  =  plus(x1, x2)
0  =  0
active(x1)  =  x1

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[U113, U123, plus2] > [tt, s1]
0 > [tt, s1]

Status:
plus2: [1,2]
tt: multiset
U113: [3,2,1]
s1: multiset
U123: [3,2,1]
0: multiset


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
mark(0) → active(0)
active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)

(49) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(U11(tt, M, N)) → MARK(U12(tt, M, N))
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(50) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MARK(x1)  =  x1
U11(x1, x2, x3)  =  U11
ACTIVE(x1)  =  ACTIVE
mark(x1)  =  mark
tt  =  tt
U12(x1, x2, x3)  =  U12
plus(x1, x2)  =  plus(x2)
active(x1)  =  active
s(x1)  =  s
0  =  0

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
plus1 > [U11, ACTIVE, mark, tt, U12, active, 0]
s > [U11, ACTIVE, mark, tt, U12, active, 0]

Status:
active: multiset
tt: multiset
plus1: multiset
mark: multiset
U12: []
U11: []
s: []
0: multiset
ACTIVE: []


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)

(51) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(U11(tt, M, N)) → MARK(U12(tt, M, N))
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(52) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MARK(x1)  =  MARK
U11(x1, x2, x3)  =  U11
ACTIVE(x1)  =  x1
mark(x1)  =  mark
tt  =  tt
U12(x1, x2, x3)  =  U12
active(x1)  =  active
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
0  =  0
plus(x1, x2)  =  plus

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
plus > [MARK, U11, active, s1] > [mark, tt, U12, 0]

Status:
active: multiset
MARK: []
tt: multiset
plus: multiset
mark: multiset
U12: []
U11: []
s1: multiset
0: multiset


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)

(53) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(U11(tt, M, N)) → MARK(U12(tt, M, N))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(54) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(U11(tt, M, N)) → MARK(U12(tt, M, N))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MARK(x1)  =  x1
U11(x1, x2, x3)  =  U11(x3)
ACTIVE(x1)  =  ACTIVE
mark(x1)  =  x1
tt  =  tt
U12(x1, x2, x3)  =  U12(x1)
active(x1)  =  x1
s(x1)  =  s
0  =  0
plus(x1, x2)  =  plus

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
U111 > ACTIVE > tt > [s, plus]
U111 > ACTIVE > U121 > [s, plus]
0 > [s, plus]

Status:
tt: multiset
plus: multiset
U121: [1]
U111: [1]
s: []
0: multiset
ACTIVE: []


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)

(55) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(56) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(57) TRUE