Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS
↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)
↳2 QDP
↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
↳4 AND
  ↳5 QDP
    ↳6 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳7 QDP
    ↳8 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳9 QDP
    ↳10 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
    ↳11 TRUE
  ↳12 QDP
    ↳13 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳14 QDP
    ↳15 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳16 QDP
    ↳17 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
    ↳18 TRUE
  ↳19 QDP
    ↳20 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳21 QDP
    ↳22 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳23 QDP
    ↳24 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳25 QDP
    ↳26 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳27 QDP
    ↳28 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
    ↳29 TRUE
  ↳30 QDP
    ↳31 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳32 QDP
    ↳33 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳34 QDP
    ↳35 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳36 QDP
    ↳37 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳38 QDP
    ↳39 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
    ↳40 TRUE
  ↳41 QDP
    ↳42 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳43 QDP
    ↳44 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳45 QDP
    ↳46 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳47 QDP
    ↳48 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳49 QDP
    ↳50 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳51 QDP
    ↳52 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
    ↳53 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(U11(tt, M, N)) → MARK(U12(tt, M, N))
ACTIVE(U11(tt, M, N)) → U121(tt, M, N)
ACTIVE(U12(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
ACTIVE(U12(tt, M, N)) → S(plus(N, M))
ACTIVE(U12(tt, M, N)) → PLUS(N, M)
ACTIVE(plus(N, 0)) → MARK(N)
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → MARK(U11(tt, M, N))
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → U111(tt, M, N)
MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U111(mark(X1), X2, X3)
MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(tt) → ACTIVE(tt)
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U121(mark(X1), X2, X3)
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(s(X)) → S(mark(X))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(0) → ACTIVE(0)
U111(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
U111(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
U111(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
U111(active(X1), X2, X3) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
U111(X1, active(X2), X3) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
U111(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
U121(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
U121(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
U121(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
U121(active(X1), X2, X3) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
U121(X1, active(X2), X3) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
U121(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
S(active(X)) → S(X)
PLUS(mark(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(X1, mark(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(active(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(X1, active(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 5 SCCs with 10 less nodes.

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS(X1, mark(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(mark(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(active(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(X1, active(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


PLUS(X1, mark(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(mark(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
PLUS(x1, x2)  =  PLUS(x1, x2)
mark(x1)  =  mark(x1)
active(x1)  =  x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[PLUS2, mark1]

Status:
PLUS2: [2,1]
mark1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS(active(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(X1, active(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


PLUS(active(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(X1, active(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[PLUS2, active1]

Status:
active1: [1]
PLUS2: [2,1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(9) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(10) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(11) TRUE

(12) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(active(X)) → S(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(13) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


S(active(X)) → S(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
S(x1)  =  S(x1)
active(x1)  =  active(x1)
mark(x1)  =  x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[S1, active1]

Status:
active1: [1]
S1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(14) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(15) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


S(mark(X)) → S(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
S(x1)  =  x1
mark(x1)  =  mark(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
mark1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(16) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(17) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(18) TRUE

(19) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U121(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
U121(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
U121(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
U121(active(X1), X2, X3) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
U121(X1, active(X2), X3) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
U121(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U121(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(20) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


U121(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
U121(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U121(x1, x2, x3)  =  U121(x2, x3)
mark(x1)  =  mark(x1)
active(x1)  =  x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
mark1 > U12^12

Status:
U12^12: [2,1]
mark1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(21) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U121(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
U121(active(X1), X2, X3) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
U121(X1, active(X2), X3) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
U121(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U121(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(22) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


U121(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U121(x1, x2, x3)  =  U121(x1, x2, x3)
mark(x1)  =  mark(x1)
active(x1)  =  x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[U12^13, mark1]

Status:
U12^13: [3,2,1]
mark1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(23) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U121(active(X1), X2, X3) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
U121(X1, active(X2), X3) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
U121(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U121(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(24) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


U121(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U121(x1, x2, x3)  =  U121(x3)
active(x1)  =  active(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
active1 > U12^11

Status:
active1: [1]
U12^11: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(25) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U121(active(X1), X2, X3) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
U121(X1, active(X2), X3) → U121(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(26) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


U121(active(X1), X2, X3) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
U121(X1, active(X2), X3) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[U12^13, active1]

Status:
active1: [1]
U12^13: [3,2,1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(27) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(28) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(29) TRUE

(30) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U111(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
U111(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
U111(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
U111(active(X1), X2, X3) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
U111(X1, active(X2), X3) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
U111(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U111(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(31) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


U111(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
U111(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U111(x1, x2, x3)  =  U111(x2, x3)
mark(x1)  =  mark(x1)
active(x1)  =  x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
mark1 > U11^12

Status:
U11^12: [2,1]
mark1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(32) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U111(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
U111(active(X1), X2, X3) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
U111(X1, active(X2), X3) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
U111(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U111(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(33) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


U111(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U111(x1, x2, x3)  =  U111(x1, x2, x3)
mark(x1)  =  mark(x1)
active(x1)  =  x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[U11^13, mark1]

Status:
U11^13: [3,2,1]
mark1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(34) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U111(active(X1), X2, X3) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
U111(X1, active(X2), X3) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
U111(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U111(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(35) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


U111(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U111(x1, x2, x3)  =  U111(x3)
active(x1)  =  active(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
active1 > U11^11

Status:
active1: [1]
U11^11: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(36) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U111(active(X1), X2, X3) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
U111(X1, active(X2), X3) → U111(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(37) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


U111(active(X1), X2, X3) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
U111(X1, active(X2), X3) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[U11^13, active1]

Status:
active1: [1]
U11^13: [3,2,1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(38) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(39) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(40) TRUE

(41) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(U11(tt, M, N)) → MARK(U12(tt, M, N))
MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(U12(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(plus(N, 0)) → MARK(N)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → MARK(U11(tt, M, N))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(42) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MARK(x1)  =  MARK
U11(x1, x2, x3)  =  U11
ACTIVE(x1)  =  x1
mark(x1)  =  x1
tt  =  tt
U12(x1, x2, x3)  =  U12
s(x1)  =  s
plus(x1, x2)  =  plus
0  =  0
active(x1)  =  active

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
0 > tt
active > [MARK, U11, U12, plus] > s > tt

Status:
active: []
MARK: []
tt: []
plus: []
U12: []
U11: []
s: []
0: []


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)

(43) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(U11(tt, M, N)) → MARK(U12(tt, M, N))
MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(U12(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(plus(N, 0)) → MARK(N)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → MARK(U11(tt, M, N))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(44) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(U12(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(plus(N, 0)) → MARK(N)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → MARK(U11(tt, M, N))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MARK(x1)  =  x1
U11(x1, x2, x3)  =  U11(x1, x2, x3)
ACTIVE(x1)  =  x1
mark(x1)  =  x1
tt  =  tt
U12(x1, x2, x3)  =  U12(x1, x2, x3)
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
plus(x1, x2)  =  plus(x1, x2)
0  =  0
active(x1)  =  x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[U113, U123, plus2] > tt > s1

Status:
plus2: [1,2]
tt: []
U113: [3,2,1]
s1: [1]
U123: [3,2,1]
0: []


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)

(45) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(U11(tt, M, N)) → MARK(U12(tt, M, N))
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(46) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MARK(x1)  =  x1
U11(x1, x2, x3)  =  U11(x1, x2, x3)
ACTIVE(x1)  =  ACTIVE
mark(x1)  =  mark
tt  =  tt
U12(x1, x2, x3)  =  U12
plus(x1, x2)  =  plus
active(x1)  =  active
s(x1)  =  s
0  =  0

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[U113, tt, active] > [ACTIVE, mark, U12, plus, 0] > s

Status:
active: []
tt: []
U113: [3,2,1]
plus: []
mark: []
U12: []
s: []
0: []
ACTIVE: []


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)

(47) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(U11(tt, M, N)) → MARK(U12(tt, M, N))
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(48) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
ACTIVE(x1)  =  ACTIVE
U11(x1, x2, x3)  =  U11(x1, x2, x3)
tt  =  tt
MARK(x1)  =  x1
U12(x1, x2, x3)  =  U12
mark(x1)  =  mark
plus(x1, x2)  =  plus(x1, x2)
active(x1)  =  active
s(x1)  =  s
0  =  0

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[U113, active] > s > tt > plus2 > [ACTIVE, U12, mark]
0 > [ACTIVE, U12, mark]

Status:
active: []
plus2: [2,1]
tt: []
U113: [3,2,1]
U12: []
mark: []
s: []
0: []
ACTIVE: []


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)

(49) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(U11(tt, M, N)) → MARK(U12(tt, M, N))
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(50) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


ACTIVE(U11(tt, M, N)) → MARK(U12(tt, M, N))
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
ACTIVE(x1)  =  ACTIVE(x1)
U11(x1, x2, x3)  =  U11(x2)
tt  =  tt
MARK(x1)  =  MARK
U12(x1, x2, x3)  =  U12
mark(x1)  =  mark
active(x1)  =  active
plus(x1, x2)  =  plus(x1, x2)
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
0  =  0

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[U111, MARK] > [ACTIVE1, U12] > [tt, mark, active] > s1
plus2 > [tt, mark, active] > s1
0 > [tt, mark, active] > s1

Status:
active: []
MARK: []
plus2: [2,1]
tt: []
U12: []
mark: []
U111: [1]
s1: [1]
0: []
ACTIVE1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)

(51) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(52) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(53) TRUE