Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could not be shown:

0 QTRS
↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)
↳2 QDP
↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
↳4 AND
  ↳5 QDP
    ↳6 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳7 QDP
    ↳8 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳9 QDP
    ↳10 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳11 QDP
    ↳12 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
    ↳13 TRUE
  ↳14 QDP
    ↳15 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳16 QDP
    ↳17 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳18 QDP
    ↳19 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
    ↳20 TRUE
  ↳21 QDP
    ↳22 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳23 QDP
    ↳24 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳25 QDP
    ↳26 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
    ↳27 TRUE
  ↳28 QDP
    ↳29 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳30 QDP
    ↳31 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳32 QDP
    ↳33 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
    ↳34 TRUE
  ↳35 QDP
    ↳36 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳37 QDP
    ↳38 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳39 QDP
    ↳40 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
    ↳41 TRUE
  ↳42 QDP
    ↳43 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳44 QDP
    ↳45 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳46 QDP
    ↳47 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳48 QDP
    ↳49 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
    ↳50 TRUE
  ↳51 QDP

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
active(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, active(X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
plus(mark(X1), X2) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
proper(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(plus(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(U11(tt, M, N)) → U121(tt, M, N)
ACTIVE(U12(tt, M, N)) → S(plus(N, M))
ACTIVE(U12(tt, M, N)) → PLUS(N, M)
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → U111(tt, M, N)
ACTIVE(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U111(active(X1), X2, X3)
ACTIVE(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U121(active(X1), X2, X3)
ACTIVE(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(s(X)) → S(active(X))
ACTIVE(s(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(active(X1), X2)
ACTIVE(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(X1, active(X2))
ACTIVE(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X2)
U111(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
U121(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
PLUS(mark(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(X1, mark(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PROPER(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U111(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
PROPER(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X3)
PROPER(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U121(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
PROPER(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X3)
PROPER(s(X)) → S(proper(X))
PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(proper(X1), proper(X2))
PROPER(plus(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(plus(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
U111(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
U121(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
S(ok(X)) → S(X)
PLUS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
TOP(mark(X)) → TOP(proper(X))
TOP(mark(X)) → PROPER(X)
TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))
TOP(ok(X)) → ACTIVE(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
active(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, active(X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
plus(mark(X1), X2) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
proper(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(plus(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 7 SCCs with 15 less nodes.

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS(X1, mark(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(mark(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
active(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, active(X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
plus(mark(X1), X2) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
proper(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(plus(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


PLUS(X1, mark(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
PLUS(x1, x2)  =  PLUS(x2)
mark(x1)  =  mark(x1)
ok(x1)  =  x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
mark1: [1]
PLUS1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS(mark(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
active(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, active(X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
plus(mark(X1), X2) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
proper(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(plus(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


PLUS(mark(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
PLUS(x1, x2)  =  PLUS(x1, x2)
mark(x1)  =  mark(x1)
ok(x1)  =  x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[PLUS2, mark1]

Status:
PLUS2: [2,1]
mark1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(9) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
active(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, active(X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
plus(mark(X1), X2) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
proper(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(plus(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(10) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


PLUS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
PLUS(x1, x2)  =  PLUS(x2)
ok(x1)  =  ok(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
ok1: [1]
PLUS1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(11) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
active(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, active(X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
plus(mark(X1), X2) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
proper(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(plus(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(12) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(13) TRUE

(14) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(ok(X)) → S(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
active(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, active(X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
plus(mark(X1), X2) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
proper(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(plus(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(15) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


S(ok(X)) → S(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
S(x1)  =  x1
ok(x1)  =  ok(x1)
mark(x1)  =  x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
ok1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(16) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
active(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, active(X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
plus(mark(X1), X2) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
proper(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(plus(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(17) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


S(mark(X)) → S(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
S(x1)  =  x1
mark(x1)  =  mark(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
mark1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(18) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
active(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, active(X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
plus(mark(X1), X2) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
proper(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(plus(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(19) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(20) TRUE

(21) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U121(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
U121(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U121(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
active(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, active(X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
plus(mark(X1), X2) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
proper(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(plus(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(22) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


U121(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U121(x1, x2, x3)  =  U121(x1, x2, x3)
ok(x1)  =  ok(x1)
mark(x1)  =  x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[U12^13, ok1]

Status:
U12^13: [3,2,1]
ok1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(23) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U121(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U121(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
active(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, active(X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
plus(mark(X1), X2) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
proper(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(plus(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(24) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


U121(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U121(X1, X2, X3)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U121(x1, x2, x3)  =  U121(x1)
mark(x1)  =  mark(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
U12^11: [1]
mark1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(25) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
active(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, active(X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
plus(mark(X1), X2) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
proper(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(plus(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(26) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(27) TRUE

(28) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U111(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
U111(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U111(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
active(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, active(X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
plus(mark(X1), X2) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
proper(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(plus(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(29) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


U111(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U111(x1, x2, x3)  =  U111(x1, x2, x3)
ok(x1)  =  ok(x1)
mark(x1)  =  x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[U11^13, ok1]

Status:
U11^13: [3,2,1]
ok1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(30) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U111(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U111(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
active(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, active(X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
plus(mark(X1), X2) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
proper(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(plus(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(31) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


U111(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U111(X1, X2, X3)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U111(x1, x2, x3)  =  U111(x1)
mark(x1)  =  mark(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
U11^11: [1]
mark1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(32) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
active(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, active(X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
plus(mark(X1), X2) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
proper(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(plus(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(33) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(34) TRUE

(35) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PROPER(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X3)
PROPER(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X3)
PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(plus(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(plus(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
active(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, active(X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
plus(mark(X1), X2) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
proper(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(plus(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(36) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


PROPER(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X3)
PROPER(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X3)
PROPER(plus(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(plus(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
PROPER(x1)  =  PROPER(x1)
U11(x1, x2, x3)  =  U11(x1, x2, x3)
U12(x1, x2, x3)  =  U12(x1, x2, x3)
s(x1)  =  x1
plus(x1, x2)  =  plus(x1, x2)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
plus2: [1,2]
PROPER1: [1]
U113: [2,1,3]
U123: [2,1,3]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(37) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
active(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, active(X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
plus(mark(X1), X2) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
proper(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(plus(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(38) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
PROPER(x1)  =  x1
s(x1)  =  s(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
s1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(39) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
active(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, active(X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
plus(mark(X1), X2) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
proper(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(plus(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(40) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(41) TRUE

(42) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(s(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
active(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, active(X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
plus(mark(X1), X2) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
proper(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(plus(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(43) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


ACTIVE(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
ACTIVE(x1)  =  ACTIVE(x1)
U12(x1, x2, x3)  =  x1
U11(x1, x2, x3)  =  x1
s(x1)  =  x1
plus(x1, x2)  =  plus(x1, x2)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
plus2: [2,1]
ACTIVE1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(44) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(s(X)) → ACTIVE(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
active(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, active(X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
plus(mark(X1), X2) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
proper(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(plus(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(45) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


ACTIVE(s(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
ACTIVE(x1)  =  ACTIVE(x1)
U12(x1, x2, x3)  =  x1
U11(x1, x2, x3)  =  x1
s(x1)  =  s(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
s1: [1]
ACTIVE1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(46) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(X1)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
active(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, active(X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
plus(mark(X1), X2) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
proper(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(plus(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(47) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


ACTIVE(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(X1)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
U113: [3,2,1]
U123: [3,2,1]
ACTIVE1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(48) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
active(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, active(X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
plus(mark(X1), X2) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
proper(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(plus(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(49) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(50) TRUE

(51) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))
TOP(mark(X)) → TOP(proper(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
active(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, active(X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
plus(mark(X1), X2) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
proper(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U11(X1, X2, X3))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(U12(X1, X2, X3))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(plus(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.