Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmpCOsQyO/PEANO_nokinds

Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS

↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)

↳2 QDP

↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

↳4 AND

  ↳5 QDP

    ↳6 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳7 QDP

    ↳8 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳9 QDP

    ↳10 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

    ↳11 TRUE

  ↳12 QDP

    ↳13 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳14 QDP

    ↳15 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳16 QDP

    ↳17 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳18 QDP

    ↳19 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

    ↳20 TRUE

  ↳21 QDP

    ↳22 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳23 QDP

    ↳24 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳25 QDP

    ↳26 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳27 QDP

    ↳28 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

    ↳29 TRUE

  ↳30 QDP

    ↳31 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳32 QDP

    ↳33 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳34 QDP

    ↳35 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

    ↳36 TRUE

  ↳37 QDP

    ↳38 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳39 QDP

    ↳40 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳41 QDP

    ↳42 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳43 QDP

    ↳44 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳45 QDP

    ↳46 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳47 QDP

    ↳48 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

    ↳49 TRUE

  ↳50 QDP

    ↳51 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳52 QDP

    ↳53 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳54 QDP

    ↳55 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳56 QDP

    ↳57 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

    ↳58 TRUE

  ↳59 QDP

    ↳60 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳61 QDP

    ↳62 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

    ↳63 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(U11(tt, N)) → MARK(N)
ACTIVE(U21(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
ACTIVE(U21(tt, M, N)) → S(plus(N, M))
ACTIVE(U21(tt, M, N)) → PLUS(N, M)
ACTIVE(and(tt, X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(isNat(0)) → MARK(tt)
ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → AND(isNat(V1), isNat(V2))
ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → ISNAT(V1)
ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → ISNAT(V2)
ACTIVE(isNat(s(V1))) → MARK(isNat(V1))
ACTIVE(isNat(s(V1))) → ISNAT(V1)
ACTIVE(plus(N, 0)) → MARK(U11(isNat(N), N))
ACTIVE(plus(N, 0)) → U11¹(isNat(N), N)
ACTIVE(plus(N, 0)) → ISNAT(N)
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → MARK(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → U21¹(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N)
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → AND(isNat(M), isNat(N))
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → ISNAT(M)
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → ISNAT(N)
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → U11¹(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(tt) → ACTIVE(tt)
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → U21¹(mark(X1), X2, X3)
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(s(X)) → S(mark(X))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → AND(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(isNat(X)) → ACTIVE(isNat(X))
MARK(0) → ACTIVE(0)
U11¹(mark(X1), X2) → U11¹(X1, X2)
U11¹(X1, mark(X2)) → U11¹(X1, X2)
U11¹(active(X1), X2) → U11¹(X1, X2)
U11¹(X1, active(X2)) → U11¹(X1, X2)
U21¹(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
U21¹(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
U21¹(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
U21¹(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
U21¹(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
U21¹(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
S(active(X)) → S(X)
PLUS(mark(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(X1, mark(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(active(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(X1, active(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(X1, mark(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(active(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(X1, active(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
ISNAT(mark(X)) → ISNAT(X)
ISNAT(active(X)) → ISNAT(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 7 SCCs with 20 less nodes.

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISNAT(active(X)) → ISNAT(X)
ISNAT(mark(X)) → ISNAT(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ISNAT(active(X)) → ISNAT(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
ISNAT(x1) = ISNAT(x1)
active(x1) = active(x1)
mark(x1) = x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[ISNAT₁, active₁]

Status:

ISNAT₁: [1]
active₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISNAT(mark(X)) → ISNAT(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ISNAT(mark(X)) → ISNAT(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
ISNAT(x1) = x1
mark(x1) = mark(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

mark₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(9) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(10) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(11) TRUE

(12) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

AND(X1, mark(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(active(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(X1, active(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(13) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

AND(X1, mark(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
AND(x1, x2) = AND(x1, x2)
mark(x1) = mark(x1)
active(x1) = x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

mark₁ > AND₂

Status:

AND₂: [2,1]
mark₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(14) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

AND(active(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(X1, active(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(15) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

AND(X1, active(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
AND(x1, x2) = AND(x2)
active(x1) = active(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

active₁ > AND₁

Status:

AND₁: [1]
active₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(16) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

AND(active(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(17) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

AND(active(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[AND₂, active₁]

Status:

AND₂: [2,1]
active₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(18) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(19) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(20) TRUE

(21) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS(X1, mark(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(mark(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(active(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(X1, active(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(22) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

PLUS(X1, mark(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(mark(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
PLUS(x1, x2) = PLUS(x1, x2)
mark(x1) = mark(x1)
active(x1) = x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

mark₁ > PLUS₂

Status:

PLUS₂: [2,1]
mark₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(23) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS(active(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(X1, active(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(24) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

PLUS(X1, active(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
PLUS(x1, x2) = PLUS(x2)
active(x1) = active(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

active₁ > PLUS₁

Status:

PLUS₁: [1]
active₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(25) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS(active(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(26) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

PLUS(active(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[PLUS₂, active₁]

Status:

PLUS₂: [2,1]
active₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(27) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(28) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(29) TRUE

(30) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(active(X)) → S(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(31) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

S(active(X)) → S(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
S(x1) = S(x1)
active(x1) = active(x1)
mark(x1) = x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[S₁, active₁]

Status:

S₁: [1]
active₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(32) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(33) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
S(x1) = x1
mark(x1) = mark(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

mark₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(34) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(35) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(36) TRUE

(37) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U21¹(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
U21¹(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
U21¹(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
U21¹(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
U21¹(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
U21¹(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(38) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

U21¹(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U21¹(x1, x2, x3) = U21¹(x3)
mark(x1) = mark(x1)
active(x1) = x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

U21^1₁: [1]
mark₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(39) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U21¹(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
U21¹(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
U21¹(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
U21¹(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
U21¹(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(40) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

U21¹(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
U21¹(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U21¹(x1, x2, x3) = U21¹(x1, x2, x3)
mark(x1) = mark(x1)
active(x1) = x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

mark₁ > U21^1₃

Status:

U21^1₃: [3,2,1]
mark₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(41) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U21¹(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
U21¹(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
U21¹(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(42) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

U21¹(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U21¹(x1, x2, x3) = x3
active(x1) = active(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

active₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(43) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U21¹(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
U21¹(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(44) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

U21¹(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U21¹(x1, x2, x3) = U21¹(x2, x3)
active(x1) = active(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[U21^1₂, active₁]

Status:

U21^1₂: [2,1]
active₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(45) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U21¹(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(46) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

U21¹(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

active₁ > U21^1₃

Status:

U21^1₃: [3,2,1]
active₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(47) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(48) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(49) TRUE

(50) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U11¹(X1, mark(X2)) → U11¹(X1, X2)
U11¹(mark(X1), X2) → U11¹(X1, X2)
U11¹(active(X1), X2) → U11¹(X1, X2)
U11¹(X1, active(X2)) → U11¹(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(51) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

U11¹(X1, mark(X2)) → U11¹(X1, X2)
U11¹(mark(X1), X2) → U11¹(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U11¹(x1, x2) = U11¹(x1, x2)
mark(x1) = mark(x1)
active(x1) = x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

mark₁ > U11^1₂

Status:

U11^1₂: [2,1]
mark₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(52) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U11¹(active(X1), X2) → U11¹(X1, X2)
U11¹(X1, active(X2)) → U11¹(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(53) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

U11¹(X1, active(X2)) → U11¹(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U11¹(x1, x2) = U11¹(x2)
active(x1) = active(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

active₁ > U11^1₁

Status:

U11^1₁: [1]
active₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(54) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U11¹(active(X1), X2) → U11¹(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(55) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

U11¹(active(X1), X2) → U11¹(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[U11^1₂, active₁]

Status:

U11^1₂: [2,1]
active₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(56) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(57) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(58) TRUE

(59) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(U11(tt, N)) → MARK(N)
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(U21(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(and(tt, X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(isNat(s(V1))) → MARK(isNat(V1))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(isNat(X)) → ACTIVE(isNat(X))
ACTIVE(plus(N, 0)) → MARK(U11(isNat(N), N))
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → MARK(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(60) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ACTIVE(U11(tt, N)) → MARK(N)
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(U21(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(and(tt, X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
ACTIVE(isNat(s(V1))) → MARK(isNat(V1))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(plus(N, 0)) → MARK(U11(isNat(N), N))
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → MARK(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MARK(x1) = MARK(x1)
U11(x1, x2) = U11(x1, x2)
ACTIVE(x1) = ACTIVE(x1)
mark(x1) = x1
tt = tt
U21(x1, x2, x3) = U21(x1, x2, x3)
s(x1) = s(x1)
plus(x1, x2) = plus(x1, x2)
and(x1, x2) = and(x1, x2)
isNat(x1) = isNat(x1)
0 = 0
active(x1) = x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[tt, 0] > [MARK₁, ACTIVE₁, U21₃, plus₂] > U11₂ > [s₁, isNat₁]
[tt, 0] > [MARK₁, ACTIVE₁, U21₃, plus₂] > and₂ > [s₁, isNat₁]

Status:

MARK₁: [1]
U11₂: [2,1]
ACTIVE₁: [1]
tt: []
U21₃: [3,2,1]
s₁: [1]
plus₂: [1,2]
and₂: [1,2]
isNat₁: [1]
0: []

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)

(61) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(isNat(X)) → ACTIVE(isNat(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(62) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 6 less nodes.

(0) Obligation:

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(2) Obligation:

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(7) Obligation:

(8) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(9) Obligation:

(10) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(11) TRUE

(12) Obligation:

(13) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(14) Obligation:

(15) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(16) Obligation:

(17) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(18) Obligation:

(19) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(20) TRUE

(21) Obligation:

(22) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(23) Obligation:

(24) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(25) Obligation:

(26) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(27) Obligation:

(28) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(29) TRUE

(30) Obligation:

(31) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(32) Obligation:

(33) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(34) Obligation:

(35) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(36) TRUE

(37) Obligation:

(38) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(39) Obligation:

(40) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(41) Obligation:

(42) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(43) Obligation:

(44) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(45) Obligation:

(46) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(47) Obligation:

(48) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(49) TRUE

(50) Obligation:

(51) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(52) Obligation:

(53) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(54) Obligation:

(55) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(56) Obligation:

(57) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(58) TRUE

(59) Obligation:

(60) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(61) Obligation:

(62) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(63) TRUE