Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmpSGKu3R/PEANO_nokinds-noand

Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS

↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)

↳2 QDP

↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

↳4 QDP

↳5 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

↳6 QDP

↳7 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

↳8 AND

  ↳9 QDP

    ↳10 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳11 QDP

    ↳12 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

    ↳13 TRUE

  ↳14 QDP

    ↳15 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳16 QDP

    ↳17 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

    ↳18 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V2)))
U12(tt) → tt
U21(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → U42(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNat(activate(V1)))
plus(N, 0) → U31(isNat(N), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(isNat(M), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U11¹(tt, V2) → U12¹(isNat(activate(V2)))
U11¹(tt, V2) → ISNAT(activate(V2))
U11¹(tt, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)
U31¹(tt, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U41¹(tt, M, N) → U42¹(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U41¹(tt, M, N) → ISNAT(activate(N))
U41¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U41¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(M)
U42¹(tt, M, N) → S(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
U42¹(tt, M, N) → PLUS(activate(N), activate(M))
U42¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U42¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(M)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11¹(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → U21¹(isNat(activate(V1)))
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
PLUS(N, 0) → U31¹(isNat(N), N)
PLUS(N, 0) → ISNAT(N)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → U41¹(isNat(M), M, N)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → ISNAT(M)
ACTIVATE(n__0) → 0¹
ACTIVATE(n__plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
ACTIVATE(n__s(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V2)))
U12(tt) → tt
U21(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → U42(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNat(activate(V1)))
plus(N, 0) → U31(isNat(N), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(isNat(M), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 5 less nodes.

(4) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U11¹(tt, V2) → ISNAT(activate(V2))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11¹(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U11¹(tt, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ACTIVATE(n__plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(N, 0) → U31¹(isNat(N), N)
U31¹(tt, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
PLUS(N, 0) → ISNAT(N)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → U41¹(isNat(M), M, N)
U41¹(tt, M, N) → U42¹(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42¹(tt, M, N) → PLUS(activate(N), activate(M))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → ISNAT(M)
U42¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U42¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(M)
U41¹(tt, M, N) → ISNAT(activate(N))
U41¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U41¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(M)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V2)))
U12(tt) → tt
U21(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → U42(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNat(activate(V1)))
plus(N, 0) → U31(isNat(N), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(isNat(M), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

U11¹(tt, V2) → ISNAT(activate(V2))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11¹(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U11¹(tt, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ACTIVATE(n__plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
U31¹(tt, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
PLUS(N, 0) → ISNAT(N)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → ISNAT(M)
U42¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U42¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(M)
U41¹(tt, M, N) → ISNAT(activate(N))
U41¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U41¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(M)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U11¹(x1, x2) = U11¹(x2)
tt = tt
ISNAT(x1) = ISNAT(x1)
activate(x1) = x1
n__plus(x1, x2) = n__plus(x1, x2)
isNat(x1) = isNat
ACTIVATE(x1) = x1
PLUS(x1, x2) = PLUS(x1, x2)
0 = 0
U31¹(x1, x2) = U31¹(x1, x2)
n__s(x1) = x1
s(x1) = x1
U41¹(x1, x2, x3) = U41¹(x2, x3)
U42¹(x1, x2, x3) = U42¹(x2, x3)
U11(x1, x2) = x1
U12(x1) = x1
U21(x1) = x1
U31(x1, x2) = U31(x2)
U41(x1, x2, x3) = U41(x2, x3)
U42(x1, x2, x3) = U42(x2, x3)
plus(x1, x2) = plus(x1, x2)
n__0 = n__0

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[U11^1₁, n_{_plus₂}, U41₂, U42₂, plus₂] > [tt, ISNAT₁, isNat, PLUS₂, 0, U31^1₂, U41^1₂, U42^1₂, n_₀] > U31₁

Status:

U11^1₁: multiset
tt: multiset
ISNAT₁: multiset
n_{_plus₂}: multiset
isNat: []
PLUS₂: multiset
0: multiset
U31^1₂: multiset
U41^1₂: multiset
U42^1₂: multiset
U31₁: multiset
U41₂: multiset
U42₂: multiset
plus₂: multiset
n_₀: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

U11(tt, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V2)))
U12(tt) → tt
U21(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → U42(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNat(activate(V1)))
plus(N, 0) → U31(isNat(N), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(isNat(M), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(X) → X

(6) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS(N, 0) → U31¹(isNat(N), N)
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → U41¹(isNat(M), M, N)
U41¹(tt, M, N) → U42¹(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42¹(tt, M, N) → PLUS(activate(N), activate(M))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V2)))
U12(tt) → tt
U21(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → U42(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNat(activate(V1)))
plus(N, 0) → U31(isNat(N), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(isNat(M), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(7) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 2 SCCs with 1 less node.

(8) Complex Obligation (AND)

(9) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ISNAT(activate(V1))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V2)))
U12(tt) → tt
U21(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → U42(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNat(activate(V1)))
plus(N, 0) → U31(isNat(N), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(isNat(M), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(10) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ISNAT(activate(V1))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
ISNAT(x1) = x1
n__s(x1) = n__s(x1)
activate(x1) = x1
U11(x1, x2) = x1
tt = tt
U12(x1) = x1
isNat(x1) = isNat
U21(x1) = U21
U31(x1, x2) = U31(x2)
U41(x1, x2, x3) = U41(x1, x2, x3)
U42(x1, x2, x3) = U42(x1, x2, x3)
s(x1) = s(x1)
plus(x1, x2) = plus(x1, x2)
n__0 = n__0
n__plus(x1, x2) = n__plus(x1, x2)
0 = 0

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[U41₃, U42₃, plus₂, n_{_plus₂}] > [n_{_s₁}, s₁] > [tt, isNat, U21, U31₁]
[n_₀, 0] > [tt, isNat, U21, U31₁]

Status:

n_{_s₁}: multiset
tt: multiset
isNat: multiset
U21: multiset
U31₁: multiset
U41₃: [3,2,1]
U42₃: [3,2,1]
s₁: multiset
plus₂: [1,2]
n_₀: multiset
n_{_plus₂}: [1,2]
0: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

U11(tt, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V2)))
U12(tt) → tt
U21(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → U42(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNat(activate(V1)))
plus(N, 0) → U31(isNat(N), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(isNat(M), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(X) → X

(11) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V2)))
U12(tt) → tt
U21(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → U42(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNat(activate(V1)))
plus(N, 0) → U31(isNat(N), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(isNat(M), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(12) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(13) TRUE

(14) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS(N, s(M)) → U41¹(isNat(M), M, N)
U41¹(tt, M, N) → U42¹(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42¹(tt, M, N) → PLUS(activate(N), activate(M))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V2)))
U12(tt) → tt
U21(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → U42(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNat(activate(V1)))
plus(N, 0) → U31(isNat(N), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(isNat(M), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(15) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

PLUS(N, s(M)) → U41¹(isNat(M), M, N)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
PLUS(x1, x2) = x2
s(x1) = s(x1)
U41¹(x1, x2, x3) = x2
isNat(x1) = isNat
tt = tt
U42¹(x1, x2, x3) = x2
activate(x1) = x1
U11(x1, x2) = x1
U12(x1) = x1
U21(x1) = x1
U31(x1, x2) = U31(x2)
U41(x1, x2, x3) = U41(x1, x2, x3)
U42(x1, x2, x3) = U42(x1, x2, x3)
plus(x1, x2) = plus(x1, x2)
n__0 = n__0
n__plus(x1, x2) = n__plus(x1, x2)
n__s(x1) = n__s(x1)
0 = 0

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[n_₀, 0] > [isNat, tt, U41₃, U42₃, plus₂, n_{_plus₂}] > [s₁, U31₁, n_{_s₁}]

Status:

s₁: multiset
isNat: []
tt: multiset
U31₁: multiset
U41₃: [2,3,1]
U42₃: [2,3,1]
plus₂: [2,1]
n_₀: multiset
n_{_plus₂}: [2,1]
n_{_s₁}: multiset
0: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

U11(tt, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V2)))
U12(tt) → tt
U21(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → U42(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNat(activate(V1)))
plus(N, 0) → U31(isNat(N), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(isNat(M), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(X) → X

(16) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U41¹(tt, M, N) → U42¹(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42¹(tt, M, N) → PLUS(activate(N), activate(M))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V2)))
U12(tt) → tt
U21(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → U42(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNat(activate(V1)))
plus(N, 0) → U31(isNat(N), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(isNat(M), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(17) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 2 less nodes.

(0) Obligation:

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(2) Obligation:

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(4) Obligation:

(5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(6) Obligation:

(7) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(8) Complex Obligation (AND)

(9) Obligation:

(10) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(11) Obligation:

(12) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(13) TRUE

(14) Obligation:

(15) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(16) Obligation:

(17) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(18) TRUE