Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS
↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)
↳2 QDP
↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
↳4 QDP
↳5 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
↳6 QDP
↳7 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
↳8 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V2)))
U12(tt) → tt
U21(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → U42(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNat(activate(V1)))
plus(N, 0) → U31(isNat(N), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(isNat(M), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U111(tt, V2) → U121(isNat(activate(V2)))
U111(tt, V2) → ISNAT(activate(V2))
U111(tt, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)
U311(tt, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U411(tt, M, N) → U421(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U411(tt, M, N) → ISNAT(activate(N))
U411(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U411(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(M)
U421(tt, M, N) → S(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
U421(tt, M, N) → PLUS(activate(N), activate(M))
U421(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U421(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(M)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U111(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → U211(isNat(activate(V1)))
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
PLUS(N, 0) → U311(isNat(N), N)
PLUS(N, 0) → ISNAT(N)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → U411(isNat(M), M, N)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → ISNAT(M)
ACTIVATE(n__0) → 01
ACTIVATE(n__plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
ACTIVATE(n__s(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V2)))
U12(tt) → tt
U21(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → U42(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNat(activate(V1)))
plus(N, 0) → U31(isNat(N), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(isNat(M), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 5 less nodes.

(4) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U111(tt, V2) → ISNAT(activate(V2))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U111(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U111(tt, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ACTIVATE(n__plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(N, 0) → U311(isNat(N), N)
U311(tt, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
PLUS(N, 0) → ISNAT(N)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → U411(isNat(M), M, N)
U411(tt, M, N) → U421(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U421(tt, M, N) → PLUS(activate(N), activate(M))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → ISNAT(M)
U421(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U421(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(M)
U411(tt, M, N) → ISNAT(activate(N))
U411(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U411(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(M)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V2)))
U12(tt) → tt
U21(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → U42(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNat(activate(V1)))
plus(N, 0) → U31(isNat(N), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(isNat(M), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U111(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
ACTIVATE(n__plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(N, 0) → U311(isNat(N), N)
U311(tt, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
PLUS(N, 0) → ISNAT(N)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → U411(isNat(M), M, N)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → ISNAT(M)
U421(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U421(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(M)
U411(tt, M, N) → ISNAT(activate(N))
U411(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U411(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(M)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U111(x1, x2)  =  x2
tt  =  tt
ISNAT(x1)  =  x1
activate(x1)  =  x1
n__plus(x1, x2)  =  n__plus(x1, x2)
isNat(x1)  =  isNat
ACTIVATE(x1)  =  x1
PLUS(x1, x2)  =  PLUS(x1, x2)
0  =  0
U311(x1, x2)  =  U311(x1, x2)
n__s(x1)  =  n__s(x1)
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
U411(x1, x2, x3)  =  U411(x2, x3)
U421(x1, x2, x3)  =  U421(x2, x3)
U11(x1, x2)  =  U11
U12(x1)  =  U12
U21(x1)  =  U21
U31(x1, x2)  =  U31(x2)
U41(x1, x2, x3)  =  U41(x1, x2, x3)
U42(x1, x2, x3)  =  U42(x1, x2, x3)
plus(x1, x2)  =  plus(x1, x2)
n__0  =  n__0

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[nplus2, U311, U413, U423, plus2] > [PLUS2, U41^12, U42^12] > [tt, isNat, U11, U12, U21] > [ns1, s1]
[nplus2, U311, U413, U423, plus2] > [PLUS2, U41^12, U42^12] > U31^12 > [ns1, s1]
[0, n0] > [ns1, s1]

Status:
tt: []
nplus2: [1,2]
isNat: []
PLUS2: [1,2]
0: []
U31^12: [2,1]
ns1: [1]
s1: [1]
U41^12: [2,1]
U42^12: [2,1]
U11: []
U12: []
U21: []
U311: [1]
U413: [3,2,1]
U423: [3,2,1]
plus2: [1,2]
n0: []


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

U11(tt, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V2)))
U12(tt) → tt
U21(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → U42(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNat(activate(V1)))
plus(N, 0) → U31(isNat(N), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(isNat(M), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(X) → X

(6) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U111(tt, V2) → ISNAT(activate(V2))
U111(tt, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)
U411(tt, M, N) → U421(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U421(tt, M, N) → PLUS(activate(N), activate(M))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V2)))
U12(tt) → tt
U21(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → U42(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNat(activate(V1)))
plus(N, 0) → U31(isNat(N), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(isNat(M), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(7) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 4 less nodes.

(8) TRUE