Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS
↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)
↳2 QDP
↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
↳4 QDP
↳5 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
↳6 QDP
↳7 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
↳8 AND
  ↳9 QDP
    ↳10 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳11 QDP
    ↳12 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳13 QDP
    ↳14 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
    ↳15 TRUE
  ↳16 QDP
    ↳17 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳18 QDP
    ↳19 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
    ↳20 TRUE
  ↳21 QDP
    ↳22 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳23 QDP
    ↳24 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
    ↳25 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
U13(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U111(tt, V1, V2) → U121(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U111(tt, V1, V2) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
U111(tt, V1, V2) → ACTIVATE(V1)
U111(tt, V1, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)
U121(tt, V2) → U131(isNat(activate(V2)))
U121(tt, V2) → ISNAT(activate(V2))
U121(tt, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)
U211(tt, V1) → U221(isNat(activate(V1)))
U211(tt, V1) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
U211(tt, V1) → ACTIVATE(V1)
U311(tt, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U411(tt, M, N) → S(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
U411(tt, M, N) → PLUS(activate(N), activate(M))
U411(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U411(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(M)
AND(tt, X) → ACTIVATE(X)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U111(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → AND(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → U211(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → AND(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ISNATKIND(n__s(V1)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
ISNATKIND(n__s(V1)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
PLUS(N, 0) → U311(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
PLUS(N, 0) → AND(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))
PLUS(N, 0) → ISNAT(N)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → U411(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → AND(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → AND(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → ISNAT(M)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → ISNAT(N)
ACTIVATE(n__0) → 01
ACTIVATE(n__plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
ACTIVATE(n__isNatKind(X)) → ISNATKIND(X)
ACTIVATE(n__s(X)) → S(X)
ACTIVATE(n__and(X1, X2)) → AND(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
U13(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 5 less nodes.

(4) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U121(tt, V2) → ISNAT(activate(V2))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U111(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
U111(tt, V1, V2) → U121(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U121(tt, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ACTIVATE(n__plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(N, 0) → U311(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
U311(tt, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
ACTIVATE(n__isNatKind(X)) → ISNATKIND(X)
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → AND(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
AND(tt, X) → ACTIVATE(X)
ACTIVATE(n__and(X1, X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ISNATKIND(n__s(V1)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
ISNATKIND(n__s(V1)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
PLUS(N, 0) → AND(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))
PLUS(N, 0) → ISNAT(N)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → AND(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → U211(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
U211(tt, V1) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
U211(tt, V1) → ACTIVATE(V1)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → U411(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
U411(tt, M, N) → PLUS(activate(N), activate(M))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → AND(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → AND(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → ISNAT(M)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → ISNAT(N)
U411(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U411(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(M)
U111(tt, V1, V2) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
U111(tt, V1, V2) → ACTIVATE(V1)
U111(tt, V1, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
U13(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


U121(tt, V2) → ISNAT(activate(V2))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U111(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
U111(tt, V1, V2) → U121(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U121(tt, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ACTIVATE(n__plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(N, 0) → U311(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
U311(tt, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → AND(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
ACTIVATE(n__and(X1, X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
PLUS(N, 0) → AND(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))
PLUS(N, 0) → ISNAT(N)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → AND(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → AND(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → ISNAT(M)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → ISNAT(N)
U411(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U411(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(M)
U111(tt, V1, V2) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
U111(tt, V1, V2) → ACTIVATE(V1)
U111(tt, V1, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U121(x1, x2)  =  U121(x1, x2)
tt  =  tt
ISNAT(x1)  =  x1
activate(x1)  =  x1
n__plus(x1, x2)  =  n__plus(x1, x2)
U111(x1, x2, x3)  =  U111(x2, x3)
and(x1, x2)  =  and(x1, x2)
isNatKind(x1)  =  x1
n__isNatKind(x1)  =  x1
isNat(x1)  =  isNat
ACTIVATE(x1)  =  x1
PLUS(x1, x2)  =  PLUS(x1, x2)
0  =  0
U311(x1, x2)  =  U311(x1, x2)
ISNATKIND(x1)  =  x1
AND(x1, x2)  =  x2
n__and(x1, x2)  =  n__and(x1, x2)
n__s(x1)  =  x1
U211(x1, x2)  =  x2
s(x1)  =  x1
U411(x1, x2, x3)  =  U411(x2, x3)
n__0  =  n__0
U41(x1, x2, x3)  =  U41(x2, x3)
plus(x1, x2)  =  plus(x1, x2)
U11(x1, x2, x3)  =  U11
U21(x1, x2)  =  U21
U12(x1, x2)  =  U12
U22(x1)  =  U22
U13(x1)  =  x1
U31(x1, x2)  =  U31(x1, x2)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[nplus2, U412, plus2] > U11^12 > U12^12 > [tt, isNat, U11, U21, U12, U22]
[nplus2, U412, plus2] > [and2, PLUS2, nand2, U41^12] > U31^12 > [tt, isNat, U11, U21, U12, U22]
[nplus2, U412, plus2] > U312 > [tt, isNat, U11, U21, U12, U22]
[0, n0] > [and2, PLUS2, nand2, U41^12] > U31^12 > [tt, isNat, U11, U21, U12, U22]
[0, n0] > U312 > [tt, isNat, U11, U21, U12, U22]

Status:
nplus2: [2,1]
plus2: [2,1]
U21: []
U12^12: [2,1]
U22: []
U312: [1,2]
U12: []
U11: []
and2: [2,1]
0: []
isNat: []
nand2: [2,1]
PLUS2: [1,2]
tt: []
U41^12: [2,1]
U11^12: [1,2]
U31^12: [1,2]
U412: [1,2]
n0: []


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

isNat(n__0) → tt
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U22(tt) → tt
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
U13(tt) → tt
activate(X) → X
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
0 → n__0
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)

(6) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVATE(n__isNatKind(X)) → ISNATKIND(X)
AND(tt, X) → ACTIVATE(X)
ISNATKIND(n__s(V1)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
ISNATKIND(n__s(V1)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → U211(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
U211(tt, V1) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
U211(tt, V1) → ACTIVATE(V1)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → U411(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
U411(tt, M, N) → PLUS(activate(N), activate(M))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → AND(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
U13(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(7) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 3 SCCs with 5 less nodes.

(8) Complex Obligation (AND)

(9) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISNATKIND(n__s(V1)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
ISNATKIND(n__s(V1)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ACTIVATE(n__isNatKind(X)) → ISNATKIND(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
U13(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(10) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


ISNATKIND(n__s(V1)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ACTIVATE(n__isNatKind(X)) → ISNATKIND(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
ISNATKIND(x1)  =  ISNATKIND(x1)
n__s(x1)  =  x1
activate(x1)  =  x1
ACTIVATE(x1)  =  ACTIVATE(x1)
n__isNatKind(x1)  =  n__isNatKind(x1)
isNat(x1)  =  isNat
n__0  =  n__0
tt  =  tt
U41(x1, x2, x3)  =  U41(x2, x3)
s(x1)  =  x1
plus(x1, x2)  =  plus(x1, x2)
isNatKind(x1)  =  isNatKind(x1)
n__plus(x1, x2)  =  n__plus(x1, x2)
U11(x1, x2, x3)  =  U11
and(x1, x2)  =  x2
U21(x1, x2)  =  U21
U12(x1, x2)  =  x1
U22(x1)  =  x1
U13(x1)  =  x1
U31(x1, x2)  =  U31(x2)
0  =  0
n__and(x1, x2)  =  x2

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[isNat, n0, tt, U11, U21, 0] > [nisNatKind1, isNatKind1] > ISNATKIND1 > ACTIVATE1
[isNat, n0, tt, U11, U21, 0] > [U412, plus2, nplus2] > U311

Status:
nplus2: [2,1]
U21: []
plus2: [2,1]
nisNatKind1: [1]
ISNATKIND1: [1]
U11: []
isNatKind1: [1]
0: []
isNat: []
tt: []
U311: [1]
U412: [1,2]
n0: []
ACTIVATE1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

isNat(n__0) → tt
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U22(tt) → tt
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
U13(tt) → tt
activate(X) → X
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
0 → n__0
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)

(11) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISNATKIND(n__s(V1)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
U13(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(12) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


ISNATKIND(n__s(V1)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
ISNATKIND(x1)  =  x1
n__s(x1)  =  n__s(x1)
activate(x1)  =  x1
isNat(x1)  =  isNat(x1)
n__0  =  n__0
tt  =  tt
U41(x1, x2, x3)  =  U41(x1, x2, x3)
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
plus(x1, x2)  =  plus(x1, x2)
isNatKind(x1)  =  x1
n__plus(x1, x2)  =  n__plus(x1, x2)
U11(x1, x2, x3)  =  x2
and(x1, x2)  =  x2
n__isNatKind(x1)  =  x1
U21(x1, x2)  =  U21(x2)
U12(x1, x2)  =  U12
U22(x1)  =  x1
U13(x1)  =  U13
U31(x1, x2)  =  U31(x1, x2)
0  =  0
n__and(x1, x2)  =  x2

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[isNat1, U211] > [tt, U12, U13]
[U413, plus2, nplus2] > [ns1, s1] > [tt, U12, U13]
[U413, plus2, nplus2] > [n0, U312, 0] > [tt, U12, U13]

Status:
U13: []
nplus2: [1,2]
plus2: [1,2]
U312: [2,1]
U413: [3,2,1]
U12: []
ns1: [1]
0: []
tt: []
n0: []
s1: [1]
isNat1: [1]
U211: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

isNat(n__0) → tt
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U22(tt) → tt
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
U13(tt) → tt
activate(X) → X
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
0 → n__0
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)

(13) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
U13(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(14) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(15) TRUE

(16) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → U211(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
U211(tt, V1) → ISNAT(activate(V1))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
U13(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(17) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → U211(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
U211(tt, V1) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
ISNAT(x1)  =  ISNAT(x1)
n__s(x1)  =  n__s(x1)
U211(x1, x2)  =  U211(x1, x2)
isNatKind(x1)  =  isNatKind
activate(x1)  =  x1
tt  =  tt
isNat(x1)  =  isNat(x1)
n__0  =  n__0
U41(x1, x2, x3)  =  U41(x1, x2, x3)
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
plus(x1, x2)  =  plus(x1, x2)
n__plus(x1, x2)  =  n__plus(x1, x2)
U11(x1, x2, x3)  =  U11(x1, x2, x3)
and(x1, x2)  =  x2
n__isNatKind(x1)  =  n__isNatKind
U21(x1, x2)  =  U21(x1, x2)
U12(x1, x2)  =  U12
U22(x1)  =  U22
U13(x1)  =  U13
U31(x1, x2)  =  U31(x1, x2)
0  =  0
n__and(x1, x2)  =  x2

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[ISNAT1, U21^12] > [isNatKind, nisNatKind] > tt
[isNat1, U413, plus2, nplus2, U113] > [ns1, s1] > U212 > U22 > tt
[isNat1, U413, plus2, nplus2, U113] > [isNatKind, nisNatKind] > tt
[isNat1, U413, plus2, nplus2, U113] > U12 > U13 > tt
[isNat1, U413, plus2, nplus2, U113] > U312
[n0, 0] > tt

Status:
nplus2: [2,1]
U13: []
plus2: [2,1]
U22: []
U312: [2,1]
U413: [2,3,1]
U113: [3,1,2]
U21^12: [2,1]
U12: []
nisNatKind: []
ns1: [1]
0: []
U212: [1,2]
ISNAT1: [1]
tt: []
n0: []
isNatKind: []
s1: [1]
isNat1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U22(tt) → tt
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
U13(tt) → tt
activate(X) → X
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
0 → n__0
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)

(18) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
U13(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(19) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(20) TRUE

(21) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS(N, s(M)) → U411(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
U411(tt, M, N) → PLUS(activate(N), activate(M))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
U13(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(22) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


U411(tt, M, N) → PLUS(activate(N), activate(M))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
PLUS(x1, x2)  =  x2
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
U411(x1, x2, x3)  =  U411(x2)
and(x1, x2)  =  x2
isNat(x1)  =  x1
n__isNatKind(x1)  =  n__isNatKind
n__and(x1, x2)  =  x2
tt  =  tt
activate(x1)  =  x1
n__0  =  n__0
U41(x1, x2, x3)  =  U41(x1, x2, x3)
plus(x1, x2)  =  plus(x1, x2)
isNatKind(x1)  =  isNatKind
n__plus(x1, x2)  =  n__plus(x1, x2)
U11(x1, x2, x3)  =  U11(x1, x2, x3)
n__s(x1)  =  n__s(x1)
U21(x1, x2)  =  x2
U12(x1, x2)  =  U12(x1, x2)
U22(x1)  =  x1
U13(x1)  =  x1
U31(x1, x2)  =  U31(x1, x2)
0  =  0

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[n0, 0] > tt
[U413, plus2, nplus2] > [s1, U41^11, ns1]
[U413, plus2, nplus2] > [nisNatKind, isNatKind] > tt
[U413, plus2, nplus2] > U113 > U122
[U413, plus2, nplus2] > U312

Status:
nplus2: [2,1]
plus2: [2,1]
U41^11: [1]
U312: [1,2]
U413: [2,3,1]
U113: [1,3,2]
nisNatKind: []
U122: [2,1]
ns1: [1]
0: []
tt: []
n0: []
isNatKind: []
s1: [1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

isNat(n__0) → tt
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U22(tt) → tt
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
U13(tt) → tt
activate(X) → X
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
0 → n__0
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)

(23) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS(N, s(M)) → U411(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
U13(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(24) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node.

(25) TRUE