Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS
↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)
↳2 QDP
↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
↳4 AND
  ↳5 QDP
    ↳6 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳7 QDP
    ↳8 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳9 QDP
    ↳10 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
    ↳11 TRUE
  ↳12 QDP
    ↳13 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳14 QDP
    ↳15 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳16 QDP
    ↳17 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳18 QDP
    ↳19 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳20 QDP
    ↳21 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
    ↳22 TRUE
  ↳23 QDP
    ↳24 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳25 QDP
    ↳26 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳27 QDP
    ↳28 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳29 QDP
    ↳30 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳31 QDP
    ↳32 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
    ↳33 TRUE
  ↳34 QDP
    ↳35 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳36 QDP
    ↳37 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
    ↳38 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(mark(X)))
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → MARK(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
ACTIVE(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → __1(X, __(Y, Z))
ACTIVE(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → __1(Y, Z)
ACTIVE(__(X, nil)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(__(nil, X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(and(tt, X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → MARK(tt)
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → __1(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(nil) → ACTIVE(nil)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → AND(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(tt) → ACTIVE(tt)
MARK(isNePal(X)) → ACTIVE(isNePal(mark(X)))
MARK(isNePal(X)) → ISNEPAL(mark(X))
MARK(isNePal(X)) → MARK(X)
__1(mark(X1), X2) → __1(X1, X2)
__1(X1, mark(X2)) → __1(X1, X2)
__1(active(X1), X2) → __1(X1, X2)
__1(X1, active(X2)) → __1(X1, X2)
AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(X1, mark(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(active(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(X1, active(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
ISNEPAL(mark(X)) → ISNEPAL(X)
ISNEPAL(active(X)) → ISNEPAL(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(mark(X)))
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 4 SCCs with 8 less nodes.

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISNEPAL(active(X)) → ISNEPAL(X)
ISNEPAL(mark(X)) → ISNEPAL(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(mark(X)))
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


ISNEPAL(active(X)) → ISNEPAL(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
ISNEPAL(x1)  =  ISNEPAL(x1)
active(x1)  =  active(x1)
mark(x1)  =  x1

Lexicographic Path Order [LPO].
Precedence:
[ISNEPAL1, active1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISNEPAL(mark(X)) → ISNEPAL(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(mark(X)))
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


ISNEPAL(mark(X)) → ISNEPAL(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
ISNEPAL(x1)  =  x1
mark(x1)  =  mark(x1)

Lexicographic Path Order [LPO].
Precedence:
trivial


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(9) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(mark(X)))
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(10) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(11) TRUE

(12) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

AND(X1, mark(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(active(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(X1, active(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(mark(X)))
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(13) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


AND(X1, mark(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
AND(x1, x2)  =  AND(x2)
mark(x1)  =  mark(x1)
active(x1)  =  x1

Lexicographic Path Order [LPO].
Precedence:
trivial


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(14) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(active(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(X1, active(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(mark(X)))
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(15) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


AND(X1, active(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
AND(x1, x2)  =  x2
mark(x1)  =  x1
active(x1)  =  active(x1)

Lexicographic Path Order [LPO].
Precedence:
trivial


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(16) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(active(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(mark(X)))
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(17) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


AND(active(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
AND(x1, x2)  =  x1
mark(x1)  =  x1
active(x1)  =  active(x1)

Lexicographic Path Order [LPO].
Precedence:
trivial


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(18) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(mark(X)))
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(19) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Lexicographic Path Order [LPO].
Precedence:
[AND2, mark1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(20) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(mark(X)))
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(21) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(22) TRUE

(23) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

__1(X1, mark(X2)) → __1(X1, X2)
__1(mark(X1), X2) → __1(X1, X2)
__1(active(X1), X2) → __1(X1, X2)
__1(X1, active(X2)) → __1(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(mark(X)))
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(24) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


__1(X1, mark(X2)) → __1(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
__1(x1, x2)  =  __1(x2)
mark(x1)  =  mark(x1)
active(x1)  =  x1

Lexicographic Path Order [LPO].
Precedence:
trivial


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(25) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

__1(mark(X1), X2) → __1(X1, X2)
__1(active(X1), X2) → __1(X1, X2)
__1(X1, active(X2)) → __1(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(mark(X)))
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(26) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


__1(X1, active(X2)) → __1(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
__1(x1, x2)  =  x2
mark(x1)  =  x1
active(x1)  =  active(x1)

Lexicographic Path Order [LPO].
Precedence:
trivial


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(27) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

__1(mark(X1), X2) → __1(X1, X2)
__1(active(X1), X2) → __1(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(mark(X)))
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(28) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


__1(active(X1), X2) → __1(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
__1(x1, x2)  =  x1
mark(x1)  =  x1
active(x1)  =  active(x1)

Lexicographic Path Order [LPO].
Precedence:
trivial


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(29) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

__1(mark(X1), X2) → __1(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(mark(X)))
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(30) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


__1(mark(X1), X2) → __1(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Lexicographic Path Order [LPO].
Precedence:
[^12, mark1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(31) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(mark(X)))
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(32) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(33) TRUE

(34) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(__(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
ACTIVE(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → MARK(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(__(X, nil)) → MARK(X)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(isNePal(X)) → ACTIVE(isNePal(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(__(nil, X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(isNePal(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(and(tt, X)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(mark(X)))
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(35) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


ACTIVE(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → MARK(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
ACTIVE(__(X, nil)) → MARK(X)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(__(nil, X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(isNePal(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(and(tt, X)) → MARK(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MARK(x1)  =  MARK(x1)
__(x1, x2)  =  __(x1, x2)
ACTIVE(x1)  =  ACTIVE(x1)
mark(x1)  =  x1
and(x1, x2)  =  and(x1, x2)
nil  =  nil
isNePal(x1)  =  isNePal(x1)
tt  =  tt
active(x1)  =  x1

Lexicographic Path Order [LPO].
Precedence:
and2 > [MARK1, ACTIVE1] > [2, isNePal1, tt]
nil > [2, isNePal1, tt]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(mark(X)))
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(tt) → active(tt)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(tt)

(36) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(__(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(isNePal(X)) → ACTIVE(isNePal(mark(X)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(mark(X)))
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(37) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 3 less nodes.

(38) TRUE