Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmpydSJpc/PALINDROME_nokinds-noand

Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS

↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)

↳2 QDP

↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

↳4 AND

  ↳5 QDP

    ↳6 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳7 QDP

    ↳8 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

    ↳9 TRUE

  ↳10 QDP

    ↳11 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳12 QDP

    ↳13 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

    ↳14 TRUE

  ↳15 QDP

    ↳16 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳17 QDP

    ↳18 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

    ↳19 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
U11(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V2) → U22(isList(activate(V2)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt) → tt
U41(tt, V2) → U42(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U42(tt) → tt
U51(tt, V2) → U52(isList(activate(V2)))
U52(tt) → tt
U61(tt) → tt
U71(tt, P) → U72(isPal(activate(P)))
U72(tt) → tt
U81(tt) → tt
isList(V) → U11(isNeList(activate(V)))
isList(n__nil) → tt
isList(n____(V1, V2)) → U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(V) → U31(isQid(activate(V)))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNePal(V) → U61(isQid(activate(V)))
isNePal(n____(I, __(P, I))) → U71(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
isPal(V) → U81(isNePal(activate(V)))
isPal(n__nil) → tt
isQid(n__a) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__u) → tt
nil → n__nil
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u
activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(X1, X2)
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

__¹(__(X, Y), Z) → __¹(X, __(Y, Z))
__¹(__(X, Y), Z) → __¹(Y, Z)
U21¹(tt, V2) → U22¹(isList(activate(V2)))
U21¹(tt, V2) → ISLIST(activate(V2))
U21¹(tt, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)
U41¹(tt, V2) → U42¹(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U41¹(tt, V2) → ISNELIST(activate(V2))
U41¹(tt, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)
U51¹(tt, V2) → U52¹(isList(activate(V2)))
U51¹(tt, V2) → ISLIST(activate(V2))
U51¹(tt, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)
U71¹(tt, P) → U72¹(isPal(activate(P)))
U71¹(tt, P) → ISPAL(activate(P))
U71¹(tt, P) → ACTIVATE(P)
ISLIST(V) → U11¹(isNeList(activate(V)))
ISLIST(V) → ISNELIST(activate(V))
ISLIST(V) → ACTIVATE(V)
ISLIST(n____(V1, V2)) → U21¹(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
ISLIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ISLIST(activate(V1))
ISLIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISLIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ISNELIST(V) → U31¹(isQid(activate(V)))
ISNELIST(V) → ISQID(activate(V))
ISNELIST(V) → ACTIVATE(V)
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → U41¹(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ISLIST(activate(V1))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → U51¹(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ISNELIST(activate(V1))
ISNEPAL(V) → U61¹(isQid(activate(V)))
ISNEPAL(V) → ISQID(activate(V))
ISNEPAL(V) → ACTIVATE(V)
ISNEPAL(n____(I, __(P, I))) → U71¹(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
ISNEPAL(n____(I, __(P, I))) → ISQID(activate(I))
ISNEPAL(n____(I, __(P, I))) → ACTIVATE(I)
ISNEPAL(n____(I, __(P, I))) → ACTIVATE(P)
ISPAL(V) → U81¹(isNePal(activate(V)))
ISPAL(V) → ISNEPAL(activate(V))
ISPAL(V) → ACTIVATE(V)
ACTIVATE(n__nil) → NIL
ACTIVATE(n____(X1, X2)) → __¹(X1, X2)
ACTIVATE(n__a) → A
ACTIVATE(n__e) → E
ACTIVATE(n__i) → I
ACTIVATE(n__o) → O
ACTIVATE(n__u) → U

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
U11(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V2) → U22(isList(activate(V2)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt) → tt
U41(tt, V2) → U42(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U42(tt) → tt
U51(tt, V2) → U52(isList(activate(V2)))
U52(tt) → tt
U61(tt) → tt
U71(tt, P) → U72(isPal(activate(P)))
U72(tt) → tt
U81(tt) → tt
isList(V) → U11(isNeList(activate(V)))
isList(n__nil) → tt
isList(n____(V1, V2)) → U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(V) → U31(isQid(activate(V)))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNePal(V) → U61(isQid(activate(V)))
isNePal(n____(I, __(P, I))) → U71(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
isPal(V) → U81(isNePal(activate(V)))
isPal(n__nil) → tt
isQid(n__a) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__u) → tt
nil → n__nil
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u
activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(X1, X2)
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 3 SCCs with 32 less nodes.

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

__¹(__(X, Y), Z) → __¹(Y, Z)
__¹(__(X, Y), Z) → __¹(X, __(Y, Z))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
U11(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V2) → U22(isList(activate(V2)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt) → tt
U41(tt, V2) → U42(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U42(tt) → tt
U51(tt, V2) → U52(isList(activate(V2)))
U52(tt) → tt
U61(tt) → tt
U71(tt, P) → U72(isPal(activate(P)))
U72(tt) → tt
U81(tt) → tt
isList(V) → U11(isNeList(activate(V)))
isList(n__nil) → tt
isList(n____(V1, V2)) → U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(V) → U31(isQid(activate(V)))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNePal(V) → U61(isQid(activate(V)))
isNePal(n____(I, __(P, I))) → U71(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
isPal(V) → U81(isNePal(activate(V)))
isPal(n__nil) → tt
isQid(n__a) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__u) → tt
nil → n__nil
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u
activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(X1, X2)
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

__¹(__(X, Y), Z) → __¹(Y, Z)
__¹(__(X, Y), Z) → __¹(X, __(Y, Z))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
__¹(x1, x2) = x1
__(x1, x2) = __(x1, x2)
nil = nil
n____(x1, x2) = n____(x1, x2)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

__₂ > n_{_{_{_₂}}}

Status:

__₂: [1,2]
n_{_{_{_₂}}}: [2,1]
nil: []

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
U11(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V2) → U22(isList(activate(V2)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt) → tt
U41(tt, V2) → U42(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U42(tt) → tt
U51(tt, V2) → U52(isList(activate(V2)))
U52(tt) → tt
U61(tt) → tt
U71(tt, P) → U72(isPal(activate(P)))
U72(tt) → tt
U81(tt) → tt
isList(V) → U11(isNeList(activate(V)))
isList(n__nil) → tt
isList(n____(V1, V2)) → U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(V) → U31(isQid(activate(V)))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNePal(V) → U61(isQid(activate(V)))
isNePal(n____(I, __(P, I))) → U71(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
isPal(V) → U81(isNePal(activate(V)))
isPal(n__nil) → tt
isQid(n__a) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__u) → tt
nil → n__nil
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u
activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(X1, X2)
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(9) TRUE

(10) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U71¹(tt, P) → ISPAL(activate(P))
ISPAL(V) → ISNEPAL(activate(V))
ISNEPAL(n____(I, __(P, I))) → U71¹(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
U11(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V2) → U22(isList(activate(V2)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt) → tt
U41(tt, V2) → U42(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U42(tt) → tt
U51(tt, V2) → U52(isList(activate(V2)))
U52(tt) → tt
U61(tt) → tt
U71(tt, P) → U72(isPal(activate(P)))
U72(tt) → tt
U81(tt) → tt
isList(V) → U11(isNeList(activate(V)))
isList(n__nil) → tt
isList(n____(V1, V2)) → U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(V) → U31(isQid(activate(V)))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNePal(V) → U61(isQid(activate(V)))
isNePal(n____(I, __(P, I))) → U71(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
isPal(V) → U81(isNePal(activate(V)))
isPal(n__nil) → tt
isQid(n__a) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__u) → tt
nil → n__nil
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u
activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(X1, X2)
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(11) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

U71¹(tt, P) → ISPAL(activate(P))
ISNEPAL(n____(I, __(P, I))) → U71¹(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U71¹(x1, x2) = U71¹(x1, x2)
tt = tt
ISPAL(x1) = x1
activate(x1) = x1
ISNEPAL(x1) = x1
n____(x1, x2) = n____(x1, x2)
__(x1, x2) = __(x1, x2)
isQid(x1) = x1
n__o = n__o
n__i = n__i
n__e = n__e
n__a = n__a
u = u
n__u = n__u
o = o
i = i
e = e
a = a
nil = nil
n__nil = n__nil

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[U71^1₂, n_{_{_{_₂}}}, _{_₂}]
[n_{_o}, o] > tt
[n_{_i}, i] > tt
[n_{_e}, e] > tt
[n_{_a}, a] > tt
[u, n_{_u}] > tt
[nil, n_{_nil}]

Status:

i: []
a: []
n_{_u}: []
__₂: [1,2]
e: []
n_{_i}: []
U71^1₂: [1,2]
n_{_e}: []
n_{_nil}: []
o: []
n_{_{_{_₂}}}: [1,2]
n_{_a}: []
n_{_o}: []
tt: []
u: []
nil: []

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__a) → tt
u → n__u
o → n__o
i → n__i
__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
e → n__e
a → n__a
__(nil, X) → X
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
__(X, nil) → X
nil → n__nil
isQid(n__u) → tt
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(X1, X2)

(12) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISPAL(V) → ISNEPAL(activate(V))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
U11(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V2) → U22(isList(activate(V2)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt) → tt
U41(tt, V2) → U42(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U42(tt) → tt
U51(tt, V2) → U52(isList(activate(V2)))
U52(tt) → tt
U61(tt) → tt
U71(tt, P) → U72(isPal(activate(P)))
U72(tt) → tt
U81(tt) → tt
isList(V) → U11(isNeList(activate(V)))
isList(n__nil) → tt
isList(n____(V1, V2)) → U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(V) → U31(isQid(activate(V)))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNePal(V) → U61(isQid(activate(V)))
isNePal(n____(I, __(P, I))) → U71(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
isPal(V) → U81(isNePal(activate(V)))
isPal(n__nil) → tt
isQid(n__a) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__u) → tt
nil → n__nil
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u
activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(X1, X2)
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(13) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node.

(14) TRUE

(15) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U21¹(tt, V2) → ISLIST(activate(V2))
ISLIST(V) → ISNELIST(activate(V))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → U41¹(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U41¹(tt, V2) → ISNELIST(activate(V2))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ISLIST(activate(V1))
ISLIST(n____(V1, V2)) → U21¹(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
ISLIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ISLIST(activate(V1))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → U51¹(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U51¹(tt, V2) → ISLIST(activate(V2))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ISNELIST(activate(V1))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
U11(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V2) → U22(isList(activate(V2)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt) → tt
U41(tt, V2) → U42(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U42(tt) → tt
U51(tt, V2) → U52(isList(activate(V2)))
U52(tt) → tt
U61(tt) → tt
U71(tt, P) → U72(isPal(activate(P)))
U72(tt) → tt
U81(tt) → tt
isList(V) → U11(isNeList(activate(V)))
isList(n__nil) → tt
isList(n____(V1, V2)) → U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(V) → U31(isQid(activate(V)))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNePal(V) → U61(isQid(activate(V)))
isNePal(n____(I, __(P, I))) → U71(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
isPal(V) → U81(isNePal(activate(V)))
isPal(n__nil) → tt
isQid(n__a) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__u) → tt
nil → n__nil
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u
activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(X1, X2)
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(16) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

U21¹(tt, V2) → ISLIST(activate(V2))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → U41¹(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U41¹(tt, V2) → ISNELIST(activate(V2))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ISLIST(activate(V1))
ISLIST(n____(V1, V2)) → U21¹(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
ISLIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ISLIST(activate(V1))
U51¹(tt, V2) → ISLIST(activate(V2))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ISNELIST(activate(V1))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U21¹(x1, x2) = U21¹(x1, x2)
tt = tt
ISLIST(x1) = x1
activate(x1) = x1
ISNELIST(x1) = x1
n____(x1, x2) = n____(x1, x2)
U41¹(x1, x2) = U41¹(x1, x2)
isList(x1) = isList(x1)
U51¹(x1, x2) = U51¹(x1, x2)
isNeList(x1) = x1
__(x1, x2) = __(x1, x2)
nil = nil
U21(x1, x2) = U21(x1, x2)
U22(x1) = x1
U11(x1) = U11(x1)
U31(x1) = x1
U41(x1, x2) = U41(x1, x2)
U42(x1) = x1
U51(x1, x2) = U51(x2)
U52(x1) = x1
n__nil = n__nil
isQid(x1) = x1
n__o = n__o
n__i = n__i
n__e = n__e
n__a = n__a
u = u
n__u = n__u
o = o
i = i
e = e
a = a

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[n_{_{_{_₂}}}, U51^1₂, _{_₂}] > U41^1₂ > [U21^1₂, isList₁, U11₁, U51₁]
[n_{_{_{_₂}}}, U51^1₂, _{_₂}] > U21₂ > [U21^1₂, isList₁, U11₁, U51₁]
[n_{_{_{_₂}}}, U51^1₂, _{_₂}] > U41₂ > [U21^1₂, isList₁, U11₁, U51₁]
[n_{_e}, e] > [tt, nil, n_{_nil}, n_{_o}, n_{_i}, o, i] > [U21^1₂, isList₁, U11₁, U51₁]
[n_{_a}, a] > [tt, nil, n_{_nil}, n_{_o}, n_{_i}, o, i] > [U21^1₂, isList₁, U11₁, U51₁]
[u, n_{_u}] > [tt, nil, n_{_nil}, n_{_o}, n_{_i}, o, i] > [U21^1₂, isList₁, U11₁, U51₁]

Status:

i: []
U51^1₂: [1,2]
a: []
isList₁: [1]
__₂: [1,2]
n_{_u}: []
e: []
n_{_i}: []
U21^1₂: [1,2]
n_{_e}: []
n_{_nil}: []
n_{_{_{_₂}}}: [1,2]
o: []
U21₂: [2,1]
n_{_a}: []
n_{_o}: []
tt: []
U41^1₂: [1,2]
U41₂: [1,2]
u: []
U11₁: [1]
nil: []
U51₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(nil, X) → X
__(X, nil) → X
U21(tt, V2) → U22(isList(activate(V2)))
U11(tt) → tt
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt) → tt
U41(tt, V2) → U42(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U42(tt) → tt
U51(tt, V2) → U52(isList(activate(V2)))
U52(tt) → tt
isList(V) → U11(isNeList(activate(V)))
isList(n__nil) → tt
isList(n____(V1, V2)) → U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(V) → U31(isQid(activate(V)))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__a) → tt
u → n__u
o → n__o
i → n__i
e → n__e
a → n__a
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
nil → n__nil
isQid(n__u) → tt
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(X1, X2)

(17) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISLIST(V) → ISNELIST(activate(V))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → U51¹(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
U11(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V2) → U22(isList(activate(V2)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt) → tt
U41(tt, V2) → U42(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U42(tt) → tt
U51(tt, V2) → U52(isList(activate(V2)))
U52(tt) → tt
U61(tt) → tt
U71(tt, P) → U72(isPal(activate(P)))
U72(tt) → tt
U81(tt) → tt
isList(V) → U11(isNeList(activate(V)))
isList(n__nil) → tt
isList(n____(V1, V2)) → U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(V) → U31(isQid(activate(V)))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNePal(V) → U61(isQid(activate(V)))
isNePal(n____(I, __(P, I))) → U71(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
isPal(V) → U81(isNePal(activate(V)))
isPal(n__nil) → tt
isQid(n__a) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__u) → tt
nil → n__nil
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u
activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(X1, X2)
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(18) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 2 less nodes.

(0) Obligation:

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(2) Obligation:

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(7) Obligation:

(8) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(9) TRUE

(10) Obligation:

(11) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(12) Obligation:

(13) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(14) TRUE

(15) Obligation:

(16) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(17) Obligation:

(18) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(19) TRUE