Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could not be shown:

0 QTRS
↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)
↳2 QDP
↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
↳4 AND
  ↳5 QDP
    ↳6 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳7 QDP
    ↳8 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳9 QDP
    ↳10 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
    ↳11 TRUE
  ↳12 QDP
    ↳13 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳14 QDP
    ↳15 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳16 QDP
    ↳17 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
    ↳18 TRUE
  ↳19 QDP
    ↳20 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳21 QDP
    ↳22 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳23 QDP
    ↳24 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
    ↳25 TRUE
  ↳26 QDP
    ↳27 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳28 QDP
    ↳29 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳30 QDP
    ↳31 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
    ↳32 TRUE
  ↳33 QDP
    ↳34 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳35 QDP
    ↳36 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳37 QDP
    ↳38 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳39 QDP
    ↳40 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
    ↳41 TRUE
  ↳42 QDP
    ↳43 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳44 QDP
    ↳45 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳46 QDP
    ↳47 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳48 QDP
    ↳49 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳50 QDP
    ↳51 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
    ↳52 TRUE
  ↳53 QDP

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(zeros) → CONS(0, zeros)
ACTIVE(length(cons(N, L))) → S(length(L))
ACTIVE(length(cons(N, L))) → LENGTH(L)
ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) → CONS(active(X1), X2)
ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(and(X1, X2)) → AND(active(X1), X2)
ACTIVE(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(length(X)) → LENGTH(active(X))
ACTIVE(length(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(s(X)) → S(active(X))
ACTIVE(s(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
LENGTH(mark(X)) → LENGTH(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → CONS(proper(X1), proper(X2))
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(and(X1, X2)) → AND(proper(X1), proper(X2))
PROPER(and(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(and(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(length(X)) → LENGTH(proper(X))
PROPER(length(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(s(X)) → S(proper(X))
PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)
CONS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
AND(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
LENGTH(ok(X)) → LENGTH(X)
S(ok(X)) → S(X)
TOP(mark(X)) → TOP(proper(X))
TOP(mark(X)) → PROPER(X)
TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))
TOP(ok(X)) → ACTIVE(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 7 SCCs with 13 less nodes.

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(ok(X)) → S(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


S(mark(X)) → S(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
S(x1)  =  x1
ok(x1)  =  x1
mark(x1)  =  mark(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
trivial


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(ok(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


S(ok(X)) → S(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
S(x1)  =  x1
ok(x1)  =  ok(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
trivial


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(9) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(10) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(11) TRUE

(12) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LENGTH(ok(X)) → LENGTH(X)
LENGTH(mark(X)) → LENGTH(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(13) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


LENGTH(mark(X)) → LENGTH(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
LENGTH(x1)  =  x1
ok(x1)  =  x1
mark(x1)  =  mark(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
trivial


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(14) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LENGTH(ok(X)) → LENGTH(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(15) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


LENGTH(ok(X)) → LENGTH(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
LENGTH(x1)  =  x1
ok(x1)  =  ok(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
trivial


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(16) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(17) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(18) TRUE

(19) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

AND(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(20) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


AND(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
AND(x1, x2)  =  x2
ok(x1)  =  ok(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
trivial


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(21) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(22) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
AND(x1, x2)  =  x1
mark(x1)  =  mark(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
trivial


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(23) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(24) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(25) TRUE

(26) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(27) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


CONS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
CONS(x1, x2)  =  x2
ok(x1)  =  ok(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
trivial


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(28) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(29) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
CONS(x1, x2)  =  x1
mark(x1)  =  mark(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
trivial


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(30) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(31) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(32) TRUE

(33) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(and(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(and(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(length(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(34) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(and(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(and(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
PROPER(x1)  =  x1
cons(x1, x2)  =  cons(x1, x2)
and(x1, x2)  =  and(x1, x2)
length(x1)  =  x1
s(x1)  =  x1

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
trivial


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(35) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PROPER(length(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(36) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
PROPER(x1)  =  x1
length(x1)  =  x1
s(x1)  =  s(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
trivial


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(37) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PROPER(length(X)) → PROPER(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(38) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


PROPER(length(X)) → PROPER(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
PROPER(x1)  =  x1
length(x1)  =  length(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
trivial


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(39) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(40) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(41) TRUE

(42) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(length(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(s(X)) → ACTIVE(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(43) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


ACTIVE(s(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
ACTIVE(x1)  =  x1
and(x1, x2)  =  x1
cons(x1, x2)  =  x1
length(x1)  =  x1
s(x1)  =  s(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
trivial


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(44) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(length(X)) → ACTIVE(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(45) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


ACTIVE(length(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
ACTIVE(x1)  =  x1
and(x1, x2)  =  x1
cons(x1, x2)  =  x1
length(x1)  =  length(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
trivial


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(46) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(47) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
ACTIVE(x1)  =  x1
and(x1, x2)  =  x1
cons(x1, x2)  =  cons(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
trivial


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(48) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(49) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


ACTIVE(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
ACTIVE(x1)  =  x1
and(x1, x2)  =  and(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
trivial

Status:
trivial


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(50) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(51) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(52) TRUE

(53) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))
TOP(mark(X)) → TOP(proper(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.