(0) Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
terms(N) → cons(recip(sqr(N)))
sqr(0) → 0
sqr(s(X)) → s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X)))
dbl(0) → 0
dbl(s(X)) → s(s(dbl(X)))
add(0, X) → X
add(s(X), Y) → s(add(X, Y))
first(0, X) → nil
first(s(X), cons(Y)) → cons(Y)
half(0) → 0
half(s(0)) → 0
half(s(s(X))) → s(half(X))
half(dbl(X)) → X
Q is empty.
(1) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
Used ordering:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
terms(
x1) =
terms(
x1)
cons(
x1) =
x1
recip(
x1) =
x1
sqr(
x1) =
sqr(
x1)
0 =
0
s(
x1) =
s(
x1)
add(
x1,
x2) =
add(
x1,
x2)
dbl(
x1) =
dbl(
x1)
first(
x1,
x2) =
first(
x1,
x2)
nil =
nil
half(
x1) =
half(
x1)
Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[terms1, sqr1, dbl1] > [0, nil]
[terms1, sqr1, dbl1] > add2 > s1
half1 > [0, nil]
half1 > s1
Status:
add2: multiset
half1: [1]
sqr1: [1]
dbl1: [1]
s1: [1]
0: multiset
first2: [2,1]
terms1: [1]
nil: multiset
With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly:
sqr(0) → 0
sqr(s(X)) → s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X)))
dbl(0) → 0
dbl(s(X)) → s(s(dbl(X)))
add(0, X) → X
add(s(X), Y) → s(add(X, Y))
first(0, X) → nil
first(s(X), cons(Y)) → cons(Y)
half(0) → 0
half(s(0)) → 0
half(s(s(X))) → s(half(X))
half(dbl(X)) → X
(2) Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
terms(N) → cons(recip(sqr(N)))
Q is empty.
(3) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
Used ordering:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:
POL(cons(x1)) = x1
POL(recip(x1)) = x1
POL(sqr(x1)) = x1
POL(terms(x1)) = 1 + x1
With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly:
terms(N) → cons(recip(sqr(N)))
(4) Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
R is empty.
Q is empty.
(5) RisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven.
(6) TRUE
(7) RisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven.
(8) TRUE